Abstract
This paper draws on data from learner and native-speaker corpora as well as psycholinguistic data to gain insights into second language speaker knowledge of English verb-argument constructions (VACs). For each of 34 VACs, L1 German and L1 Spanish advanced English learners’ and English native speakers’ dominant verb–VAC associations are examined based on data retrieved from the International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE), the Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI), their respective Native Speaker (NS) reference corpora, and data collected in verbal fluency tasks in which participants complete VAC frames, such as, ‘she _______ with the…’ with verbs that come to mind. We compare findings from the different data sets and consider the strengths and limitations of each in relation to questions in usage-based second language acquisition and Construction Grammar.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the following friends and colleagues for their help with distributing VAC surveys to students in Germany, Spain, and the United States: Carmen Aguilera Carnerero, Rafael Alejo Gonzalez, Ulrike Altendorf, Laura Aull, Ruth Breeze, Scott Crossley, Belén Diez-Bedmar, Fiorella Dotti, Izis Elorza, Encarna Hidalgo, Lars Hinrichs, Matt Jadlocki, Sarah Kegley, Daniela Kolbe-Hanna, Rolf Kreyer, Joseph Lee, María José López-Couso, Isabel Miñés, Juan Carlos Palmer, Caroline Payant, Carmen Perez-Llantada, Pascual Perez Paredes, Ben Pinkasovic, Audrey Roberson, Miguel Ruiz Garrido, Carmen Sancho Guinda, Andrea Sand, Marco Schilk, Rainer Schulze, Ayush Shrestha, Mary Smith, and Stefanie Wulff. The lead author acknowledges the support of the project ‘Measuring speakers’ knowledge of English verb-argument constructions: Psycholinguistic evidence from first and second language settings’ through the Georgia State University C. F. Arrington Research Initiation Grant Program.
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2014a. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/. Search in Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2014b. TagAnt (Version 1.1.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/. Search in Google Scholar
Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1). 1–27. Search in Google Scholar
Bird, Steven, Ewan Klein & Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly Media Inc. Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele Goldberg. 2011. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language 87(1). 55–83. Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Amanda & Marianne Gullberg. 2008. Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(2). 225–251. Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Amanda & Marianne Gullberg. 2010. Changes in encoding of path of motion after acquisition of a second language. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2). 263–286. Search in Google Scholar
Cadierno, Teresa. 2008. Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 239–275). London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Cadierno, Teresa. 2013. Thinking for speaking in second language acquisition. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Accessed 13 October 2017 at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1213/full. Search in Google Scholar
De Cock, Sylvie. 2004. Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literature 2. 225–246. Search in Google Scholar
Devitt, Ann, Ute Römer & Nick C. Ellis. 2017. Network analysis of knowledge of verb-argument constructions in L1 and L2 speakers. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Annual Conference, Portland, OR. Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell & Ute Römer. 2013. Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Currents in Language Learning 1. 25–51. Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell & Ute Römer. 2014a. The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1). 55–98. Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell & Ute Römer. 2014b. Second language processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(4). 405–431. Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Ute Römer & Matthew B. O’Donnell. 2016. Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Rita Simpson-Vlach. 2009. Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5. 61–78. Search in Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning. 1996. Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins. Search in Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina, Tony McEnery & Elaine Boyd. 2017. Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics 38(5). 613–637. Search in Google Scholar
Gass, Susan & Larry Selinker. Eds. 1983. Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Search in Google Scholar
Geertzen, Jeroen, Theodora Alexopoulou & Anna Korhonen. 2013. Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). Paper presented at the 31st Second Language Research Forum. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. 18–21 October. Search in Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2007. To err is not all: What corpus and elicitation can reveal about the use of collocations by learners. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55(3). 273–291. Search in Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Sylvie De Cock & Sylviane Granger (eds.). 2010. LINDSEI: Louvain international database of spoken English interlanguage. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Search in Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 1–26. Search in Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 1996. From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Karin Aijmer, Bengt Altenberg & Mats Johansson (eds.), Languages in contrast. Papers from a symposium on text-based cross-linguistic studies, 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier & Magali Paquot (eds.). 2009. ICLE: International corpus of learner English. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Data in construction grammar. In Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe & Doris Schönefeld. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4). 635–676. Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe & Doris Schönefeld. 2010. Converging evidence II: More on the association of verbs and constructions. In Sally Rice & John Newman (eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research, 59–73. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff. 2005. Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3(1). 182–200. Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff. 2009. Psycholinguistic and corpus-linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7. 163–186. Search in Google Scholar
Gruenewald, Paul J. & Gregory R. Lockhead. 1980. The free recall of category examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6(3). 225–240. Search in Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott. 2011. Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(Special Issue). 1–8. Search in Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott. 2013. Crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0291/full (Accessed 13 October 2017). Search in Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko. 2008. Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Kail, Robert & Marilyn A. Nippold. 1984. Unconstrained retrieval from semantic memory. Child Development 55(3). 944–995. Search in Google Scholar
Littré, Damien. 2015. Combining experimental data and corpus data: Intermediate French-speaking learners and the English present. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(1). 89–126. Search in Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2014. The (ir)reversibility of English binomials: Corpus, constraints, developments. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar
Odlin, Terence. 2013. Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0292/full (Accessed 13 October 2017). Search in Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Search in Google Scholar
Rebuschat, Patrick, Detmar Meurers & Tony McEnery. (eds.). 2017. Language learning research at the intersection of experimental, computational, and corpus-based approaches. [Special issue]. Language Learning 67(S1). Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, Peter & Nick C. Ellis. (eds.). 2008. Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Römer, Ute, Matthew B. O’Donnell & Nick C. Ellis. 2014a. Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. The Modern Language Journal 98(4). 952–975. Search in Google Scholar
Römer, Ute, Matthew B. O’Donnell & Nick C. Ellis. 2015. Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions: Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge. In Maggie Charles, Nicholas Groom & Suganthi John (eds.), Corpora, Grammar, Text and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston, 43–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar
Römer, Ute, Audrey Roberson, Matthew B. O’Donnell & Nick C. Ellis. 2014b. Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions. ICAME Journal 38(1). 59–79. Search in Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie. 2008. Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. London & New York: Continuum. Search in Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie. 2009. Converging evidence from corpus and experimental data to capture idiomaticity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 131–159. Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston