Let my speakers talk: metalinguistic activity can indicate semantic change

References

Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Assouline, Dalit. 2017. Contact and ideology in a multilingual community: Yiddish and Hebrew among the ultra-orthodox. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501505300Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 2018. Universals in puns and humorous wordplay. In Esme Winter-Froemel & Verena Thaler (eds.), Cultures and traditions of wordplay and wordplay research, 89–110. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110586374-005Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, Guy, Tom Wikle, Jan Tillery & Lori Sand. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3(3). 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500000569.Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 2013. Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4). 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01bar.Search in Google Scholar

Baumel, Simeon D. 2006. Sacred speakers: Language and culture among the ultra-orthodox in Israel. New-York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, Gareth & William Croft. 2016. Modeling language change across the lifespan: Individual trajectories in community change. Language Variation and Change 28(2). 129–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394516000077.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Israela & Mira Ariel. under review. Scaffolding the sentential Ultimate construction into a word.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Israela & Rachel Giora. 2018. The defaultness hypothesis: A quantitative corpus-based study of non/default sarcasm and literalness production. Journal of Pragmatics 138. 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

Beltrama, Andrea & M. Ryan Bochnak. 2015. Intensification without degrees cross-linguistically. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(3). 843–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9294-8.Search in Google Scholar

Blank, Andreas. 2001. Pathways of lexicalization. In Wolfgang Raible, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König & Wulf Oesterreicher (eds.), Language universals and language typology, 1596–1608. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Blank, Grant & Bianca C. Reisdorf. 2012. The participatory web: A user perspective on Web 2.0. Information, Communication & Society 15(4). 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.665935.Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Search in Google Scholar

Caffi, Claudia. 1994. Metapragmatics. In Ronald E. Asher & James M. Y. Simpson (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2461–2466. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cahaner, Lee & Gilad Malach. 2021. Statistical report on ultra-orthodox society in Israel. The Israel Democracy Institue. Available at: https://en.idi.org.il/haredi/2021/?chapter=38439.Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1970 [1939]. Foundations of logic and mathematics, 13th edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Henian, Patricia Cohen & Sophie Chen. 2010. How big is a big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of Odds Ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 39(4). 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383.Search in Google Scholar

Chiarcos, Christian, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski (eds.). 2011. Salience: Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110241020Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Tirza. 2008. kavey lašon yixudi’im le-sofrot datiot ve-xarediot be-hašva’a le-sofrot xiloniot ba-siporet ha-isre’elit bat zmanenu. [Unique linguistic features of religiously observant women authors compared to secular women authors in contemporary Israeli literature]. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University dissertation [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Culioli, Antoine. 1990. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation, Tome I. Opérations et représentations. Paris: Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar

Culioli, Antoine. 1995. Cognition and representation in linguistic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.112Search in Google Scholar

Culperer, Jonathan & Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English language. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Delabastita, Dirk. 2001. Aspects of interlingual ambiguity: Polyglot punning. In Paul Bogaards, Johan Rooryck & Paul J. Smith (eds.), Quitte ou double sens, 45–64. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004485693_006Search in Google Scholar

Detges, Ulrich. 2010. Computed or entrenched? The French imparfait de politesse. In Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susanne Handl (eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns, 195–224. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216035.195Search in Google Scholar

Doyle, Arthur Conan. 1887. A study in Scarlet. London & New York: Ward Lock & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Duffy, Susan A., Robin K. Morris & Keith Rayner. 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27(4). 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(88)90066-6.Search in Google Scholar

Fader, Ayala. 2009. Mitzvah girls: Bringing up the next generation of Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830992Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Roswitha. 1998. Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen: G. Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Fridman, Israela, Nava Shaul-Mena, Nir Fogel, Dmitri Romanov, Mark Feldman, Ruth Sehayek, Gustavo Schifris & Haim Portnoy. 2011. šitot medida va-amidat godla šel ha-uxlusia ha-xaredit be-Israel. [Measurement and estimates of the population of ultra-orthodox Jews in Israel]. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, Menachem. 1991. ha-xevra ha-xaredit ― mekorot, megamot ve-tahalixim. [The Haredi (ultra-orthodox) society ― Sources, trends and processes]. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8(3). 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183.Search in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Ann Kronrod, Idit Elnatan, Noa Shuval & Adi Zur. 2004. Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol 19(2). 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1902_2.Search in Google Scholar

Givoni, Shir. 2020. Marking multiple meanings. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Givoni, Shir, Rachel Giora & Dafna Bergerbest. 2013. How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings. Journal of Pragmatics 48(1). 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.011.Search in Google Scholar

Glinert, Lewis & Yosseph Shilhav. 1991. Holy land, holy language: A study of an ultraorthodox Jewish ideology. Language in Society 20(1). 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500016079.Search in Google Scholar

Gombert, Jean Émile. 1992. Metalinguistic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 2013. The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.019.Search in Google Scholar

Henkin, Roni. 2020. Sociolinguistics of Modern Hebrew. In Ruth A. Berman (ed.), Usage-based studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, morpho-lexicon, and syntax, 51–96. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.210.05henSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. I. Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Hübler, Axel & Wolfram Bublitz. 2007. Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.165.02hubSearch in Google Scholar

Isaacs, Miriam. 1999a. Contentious partners: Yiddish and Hebrew in Haredi Israel. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1999(138). 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1999.138.101.Search in Google Scholar

Isaacs, Miriam. 1999b. Haredi, haymish and frim: Yiddish vitality and language choice in a transnational, multilingual community. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1999(138). 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1999.138.9.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jaszczolt, Kasia M. & Keith Allan (eds.). 2011. Salience and defaults in utterance processing. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110270679Search in Google Scholar

Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński. 2004. Metalanguage: Why now? In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives, 3–8. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110907377.3Search in Google Scholar

Kabatek, Johannes. 2015. Wordplay and discourse traditions. In Angelika Zirker & Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.), Wordplay and metalinguistic/metadiscursive reflection: Authors, contexts, techniques, and meta-reflection. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110406719-010Search in Google Scholar

Karni, Tsofia. 2004. ha-memad ha-dati ke-me’avxen lešoni [The dimension of religiosity as a linguistic feature]. derex Efrata – bit’on bet ha-midraš le-morim ve-le-gananot Efrata [Derech Efrata – Teachers College Yearbook 11. 129–147 [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Albert N. & Todd R. Ferretti. 2003. Reading proverbs in context: The role of explicit markers. Discourse Processes 36(1). 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3601_2.Search in Google Scholar

Kerremans, Daphné. 2015. A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Bern: Peter Lang.10.1515/east-2016-0007Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. WORD 19(3). 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Cambridge: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McNabb, Yaron. 2012. Cross-categorial modification of properties in Hebrew and English. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 22. 365–382. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.2632.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Heather L. 2022. The Politics of language choice in Haredi communities in Israel. Journal of Jewish Languages 10(2). 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134638-bja10026.Search in Google Scholar

Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke. 2001. Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00132-0.Search in Google Scholar

Norén, Kerstin & Per Linell. 2007. Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: An empirical substantiation. Pragmatics 17(3). 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor.Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Tim & John Battelle. 2009. Web squared: Web 2.0 five years on. Available at: http://dgroups.org/file2.axd/45127812-6239-4448-8bb6-508dc1b1e204/web2009_websquared-whitepaper.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Oryan, Shlomit. 1997. lašon cnuʕa - nefeš cnuʕa: defusej tikšoret miluli’im be-kerev banot ve-našim xarediot [Modest language ― modest soul: Verbal communication among ultra-orthodox Jewish girls and women]. balšanut ʕivrit (Hebrew Linguistics: A Journal for Hebrew Descriptive, Computational and Applied Linguistics) 41-42. 7–19 [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Perry-Hazan, Lotem. 2013. ha-xinux ha-xaredi be-Israel: ben mišpat, tarbut u-folitika. [The ultra-orthodox education in Israel: Law, cultura and politics]. Srigim-LiOn: Nevo Publishing House [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter & Freek Van de Velde. 2018. The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language 94. 867–901. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0056.Search in Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: The Macmillan Company.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, Everett M. 2003 [1962]. Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1980. Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry 50(3-4). 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00021.x.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2007. Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 117–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2008. New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia 126(1). 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2008.002.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 3(1). 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2015-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016 [2011]. English morphology and word-formation: An introduction, 3rd edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Seidenberg, Mark S., Michael K. Tanenhaus, James M. Leiman & Marie Bienkowski. 1982. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14(4). 489–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90017-2.Search in Google Scholar

Sela, Pnina. 2004. ha-reka ha-sociolingvisti bi-lšona šel ha-publicistika ba-ʕitonut ha-xaredit. [Sociolinguistic factors in ultra-orthodox newspapers]. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University dissertation. [in Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Svanlund, Jan. 2018. Metalinguistic comments and signals: What can they tell us about the conventionalization of neologies? Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18005.sva.Search in Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, Michal & Netta Abugov. 2010. The legacy of the linguistic fence: Linguistic patterns among ultra-orthodox Jewish girls. Heritage Language Journal 7(1). 74–90. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.7.1.4.Search in Google Scholar

Tarski, Alfred. 1944. The semantic conception of truth: And the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4(3). 341–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, Verena. 2016. Varieties of wordplay. In Sebastian Knospe, Alexander Onysko & Maik Goth (eds.), Crossing languages to play with words, 47–62. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110465600-003Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jef. 2004. Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives, 53–74. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110907377.53Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. 1966. On the semantic structure of language. In Joseph H.‏ Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 142–216. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. 1979 [1953]. Languages in contact, 9th edn. Paris: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802177Search in Google Scholar

Williams, John N. 1992. Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for interrelated meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 21(3). 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01068072.Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, Susanne. 2015. Exploring ambiguity and the ambiguity model from a transdisciplinary perspective. In Susanne Winkler (ed.), Ambiguity: Language and communication, 1–26. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110403589-002Search in Google Scholar

Winter-Froemel, Esme. 2016. Approaching wordplay. In Sebastian Knospe, Alexander Onysko & Maik Goth (eds.), Crossing languages to play with words: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 11–46. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110465600-002Search in Google Scholar

Winter-Froemel, Esme & Angelika Zirker. 2015. Ambiguity in speaker-hearer-interaction: A parameter-based model of analysis. In Susanne Winkler (ed.), Ambiguity: Language and communication, 283–340. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Yaguello, Marina. 1998. Language through the looking glass: Exploring language and linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zenner, Eline, Gitte Kristiansen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2016. Individual differences and in situ identity marking: Colloquial Belgian Dutch in the reality TV show “Expeditie Robinson”. In Manuela Romano & Maria Dolores Porto (eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in social and cognitive interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives, 39–77. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.262.03zenSearch in Google Scholar

Zirker, Angelika & Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.). 2015. Wordplay and metalinguistic/metadiscursive reflection: Authors, contexts, techniques, and meta-reflection. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110406719Search in Google Scholar