Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access April 13, 2022

Effect of the selected parameters in idealizing material failures under tensile loads: Benchmarks for damage analysis on thin-walled structures

  • Aditya Rio Prabowo EMAIL logo , Ridwan Ridwan , Tuswan Tuswan , Jung Min Sohn , Eko Surojo and Fitrian Imaduddin


The development of the global economy has led to a rise in ship traffic. As a result, the risk of accidents, such as collisions between ships and grounding, has also increased. Different failure criteria to capture these accidents have been introduced by researchers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the essential distinction between these failure criteria. The simulations suggest that failure criteria based on the maximum stress result in a slightly higher rupture strain value, greater crack propagation, and higher internal energy than those based on the maximum strain. Furthermore, using a larger mesh size compared with the size of the test specimen appears to greatly affect the validity of the simulation results.


[1] UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2019. Geneva: United Nations Publication; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Calle MA, Verleysen P, Alves M. Benchmark study of failure criteria for ship collision modeling using purpose-designed tensile specimen geometries. Mar Structures. 2017;53:68–85.10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[3] Hooper JJ, Foecke T, Graham L, Weihs TP. The metallurgical analysis of wrought iron from the RMS Titanic. Meas Sci Technol. 2003;14(9):1556–63.10.1088/0957-0233/14/9/307Search in Google Scholar

[4] IMO. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). London: IMO Publications; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Yip TL, Talley WK, Jin D. The effectiveness of double hulls in reducing vessel-accident oil spillage. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011 Nov;62(11):2427–32.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Zhang S, Pedersen PT, Villavicencio R. Probability and Mechanics of Ship Collision and Grounding. UK: Elsevier; 2019.10.1016/B978-0-12-815022-1.00001-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] Minorsky VU. An Analysis of Ship Collisions with Reference to Nuclear Power Plants. J Ship Res. 1959;3(2):1–4.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lehmann E, Peschmann J. Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions. Mar Struct. 2002;15(4–5):429–41.10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00011-4Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ehlers S. The influence of the material relation on the accuracy of collision simulations. Mar Struct. 2010;23(4):462–74.10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[10] Storheim M, Amdahl J, Martens I. On the accuracy of fracture estimation in collision analysis of ship and offshore structures. Mar Struct. 2015;44:254–87.10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[11] Prabowo AR, Bae DM, Sohn JM, Zakki AF, Cao B, Cho JH. Effects of the rebounding of a striking ship on structural crashworthiness during ship-ship collision. Thin-walled Struct. 2017;115:225–39.10.1016/j.tws.2017.02.022Search in Google Scholar

[12] Prabowo AR, Baek SJ, Byeon JH, Bae DM, Cho JH, Sohn JM. Investigation on the Structural Damage of a Double-Hull Ship, Part i -Ship Collision. Procedia Struct Integr. 2017;5:935–42.10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.126Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ringsberg JW, Amdahl J, Chen BQ, Cho SR, Ehlers S, Hu Z, et al. Zhang, S. MARSTRUCT benchmark study on nonlinear FE simulation of an experiment of an indenter impact with a ship side-shell structure. Mar Struct. 2018;59:142–57.10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[14] Marinatos JN, Samuelides MS. Towards a unified methodology for the simulation of rupture in collision and grounding of ships. Mar Struct. 2015;42:1–32.10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.02.006Search in Google Scholar

[15] Calle MA, Alves M. A review-analysis on material failure modeling in ship collision. Ocean Eng. 2015;106:20–38.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.032Search in Google Scholar

[16] Vredeveldt A, Feenstra E. Crashworthy side structures for improved collision damage survivability of coasters and medium sized Ro-Ro cargo ship. Report GRD1-1999-10566, TNO/UNI, Netherlands; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Peschmann J, Kulzep A. Final report for BMBF Life-Cycle Design. Part D2A: Side Collision of Double Skin Ships. Technical University of Hamburg; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ehlers S, Broekhuijsen J, Alsos HS, Biehl F, Tabri K. Simulating the collision response of ship side structures: A failure criteria benchmark study. Int Shipbuild Prog. 2008;55(1–2):127–44.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Prabowo AR, Sohn JM, Bae DM, Setiyawan A. Crashworthiness assessment of thin-walled bottom structures during powered-hard grounding accidents. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE); 2018 Jun 17-22; Madrid, Spain. ASME, 2018. in Google Scholar

[20] Törnqvist R. Design of crashworthy ship structures [dissertation]. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rice JR, Tracey DM. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids. 1969;17(3):201–17.10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7Search in Google Scholar

[22] Cockcroft MG, Latham DJ. Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Met. 1968;96(1):33–9.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wen HM, Jones N. Experimental investigation of the scaling laws for metal plates struck by large masses. Int J Impact Eng. 1993;13(3):485–505.10.1016/0734-743X(93)90120-VSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Amdahl J, Kavlie D. Experimental and numerical simulation of double hull stranding. DNV MIT Workshop on Mechanics of Ship Collision and Grounding; 1992-Sep 16-17; Oslo, Norway. DNV; 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Amdahl J. Side collision. 22nd WEGEmT Graduate School, Technical University of Denmark; 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zhang S. The Mechanics of Ship Collisions [dissertation]. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark; 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ridwan R, Prabowo AR, Muhayat N, Putranto T, Sohn JM. Tensile analysis and assessment of carbon and alloy steels using fe approach as an idealization of material fractures under collision and grounding. Curved Layer Struct. 2020;7(1):188–98.10.1515/cls-2020-0016Search in Google Scholar

[28] Prabowo AR, Bae DM, Sohn JM, Zakki AF, Cao B, Wang Q. Analysis of structural behavior during collision event accounting for bow and side structure interaction. Theor Appl Mech Lett. 2017;7(1):6–12.10.1016/j.taml.2016.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[29] Prabowo AR, Sohn JM, Bae DM, Cho JH. Estimating structure response and progressive failure of a ship hull under side-bow collisions. Teh Vjesn. 2018;25(5):1513–22.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ. The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals. 6th ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Crisfield MA. Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Simo JC. Numerical Analysis and Simulation of Plasticity. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Celentano D. A large strain thermoviscoplastic formulation for the solidification of S.G. cast iron in a green sand mould. Int J Plast. 2001;17(12):1623–58.10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00095-4Search in Google Scholar

[34] ANSYS. ANSYS Explicit Dynamics Analysis Guide. Pennsylvania, USA: ANSYS Inc.; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Callister WD, Rethwisch DG. Materials science and engineering: an introduction. 10th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Marciniak Z, Duncan JL, Hu SJ. Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Oxford: Elsevier ButtenNorth-Heinemann; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Beddoes J, Bibby MJ. Principles of metal manufacturing processes. Oxford: Elsevier ButtenNorth-Heinemann; 1999.10.1016/B978-034073162-8/50012-6Search in Google Scholar

[38] Tekkaya EA, Altan T. Sheet Metal Forming: Fundamentals. Volume I. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Chang KH. e-Design: computer-aided engineering design. Oxford: Academic Press; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[40] AbuBakar A, Dow RS. The impact analysis characteristics of a ship’s bow during collisions. Eng Fail Anal. 2019;100:492–511.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.050Search in Google Scholar

[41] Calle MA, Oshiro RE, Alves M. Ship collision and grounding: scaled experiments and numerical analysis. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;103:195–210.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.021Search in Google Scholar

[42] Ridwan, Putranto T, Laksono FB, Prabowo AR. Fracture and Damage to the Material accounting for Transportation Crash and Accident. Procedia Struct Integr. 2020;27:38–45.10.1016/j.prostr.2020.07.006Search in Google Scholar

[43] Vukelic G, Vizentin G, Murawski L, Recho N. Marine Structural Failures Database. Rijeka, Croatia: University of Rijeka; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Alsos HS, Amdahl J. On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, Part I – Experiments. Int J Impact Eng. 2009;36(6):799– 807.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[45] Wang Z, Hu Z, Liu K, Chen G. Application of a material model based on the Johnson-Cook and Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model in ship collision and grounding simulations. Ocean Eng. 2020;205:106768.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106768Search in Google Scholar

[46] Liu B, Guedes Soares C. Effect of strain rate on dynamic responses of laterally impacted steel plates. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;160:307–17.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.034Search in Google Scholar

[47] Bureau Veritas. NR216 Rules on Materials and Welding for the Classification of Marine Units. 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[48] McDermott JF, Kline RG, Jones EL, Maniar NM, Chiang WP. Tanker Structural Analysis for Minor Collisions. New York: SNAME Transactions; 1974.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Cabezas EE, Celentano DJ. Experimental and numerical analysis of the tensile test using sheet specimens. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2004;40(5–6):555–75.10.1016/S0168-874X(03)00096-9Search in Google Scholar

[50] Wiegard B, Ehlers S. Pragmatic regularization of element-dependent effects in finite element simulations of ductile tensile failure initiation using fine meshes. Mar Struct. 2020;74:102823.10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102823Search in Google Scholar

[51] Zhang M, Sun Q, Liu J, Hu Z, Zhang S. A study of the rupture behavior of a ship side plate laterally punched by a full-shape bulbous bow indenter. Ocean Eng. 2019;182:48–60.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.081Search in Google Scholar

[52] Iannucci L, Del Rosso S, Curtis PT, Pope DJ, Duke PW. Understanding the thickness effect on the tensile strength property of Dyneema®HB26 laminates. Materials (Basel). 2018 Aug;11(8):1431.10.3390/ma11081431Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[53] Odefey M. Simulation of Collisions between RORO Vessels with Improved Double-Hull Designs [dissertation]. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Ehlers S, Varsta P. Strain and stress relation for non-linear finite element simulations. Thin-walled Struct. 2019;47(11):1203–17.10.1016/j.tws.2009.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[55] Ehlers S. Strain and stress relation until fracture for finite element simulations of a thin circular plate. Thin-walled Struct. 2010;48(1):1–8.10.1016/j.tws.2009.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[56] Needleman A, Tvergaard V. Mesh effects in the analysis of dynamic ductile crack growth. Eng Fract Mech. 1994;47(1):75–91.10.1016/0013-7944(94)90239-9Search in Google Scholar

[57] Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall. 1984;2(1):157–69.10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-XSearch in Google Scholar

[58] Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW. The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids. 1992;40(6):1377–97.10.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3Search in Google Scholar

[59] Rice JR. A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks. J Appl Mech. 1968;35(2):379–86.10.1115/1.3601206Search in Google Scholar

[60] Tvergaard V. On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract. 1982;18(4):237–52.10.1007/BF00015686Search in Google Scholar

[61] Tvergaard V, Needleman A, Lo KK. Flow localization in the plane strain tensile test. J Mech Phys Solids. 1981;29(2):115–42.10.1016/0022-5096(81)90019-3Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-28
Accepted: 2022-02-10
Published Online: 2022-04-13

© 2022 Aditya Rio Prabowo et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 5.2.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow