Mechanical and chemical bond for composite action of precast beams

References

[1] Maya LF, Zanuy C, Albajar L, Lopez C, Portabella J. Experimental assessment of connections for precast concrete frames using ultra high- performance fibre reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;48:173–86.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[2] Park R. A perspective on the seismic design of precast concrete structures in New Zealand. PCI J. 1995;40(3):40–60.10.15554/pcij.05011995.40.60Search in Google Scholar

[3] Sadrnejad SA, Labibzadeh M. Dynamic solution code for structural analysis upon joint element. J Comput Sci. 2006;2(5):401–9.10.3844/jcssp.2006.401.409Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ghayeb HH, Razak HA, Sulong NR. Performance of dowel beam-to-column connections for precast concrete systems under seismic loads: A review. Constr Build Mater. 2020;237:117582.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117582Search in Google Scholar

[5] Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Cimmino M, Capozzi V, Manfredi G. FEM analysis of the strength of RC beam-to-column dowel connections under monotonic actions. Constr Build Mater. 2014;69:271–84.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.036Search in Google Scholar

[6] Mokhtar R, Ibrahim Z, Jumaat MZ, Hamid ZA, Rahim AH. Behaviour of semi-rigid precast beam-to-column connection determined using static and reversible load tests. Measurement. 2020;164:108007.10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108007Search in Google Scholar

[7] Newman J, Choo BS, editors. Advanced concrete technology. 1st ed. London, UK: Elsevier Ltd; 1986.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Park R, Paulay T. Reinforced concrete structures. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1975. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172834.10.1002/9780470172834Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ozturan T, Ozden S, Ertas O. Ductile connections in precast concrete moment resisting frames. PCI J. 2006;9:11.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mohd Radzi NA, Hamid R. A Mutalib A, Kaish ABM. A Review of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Subjected to Severe Fire Conditions. Adv Civ Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8831120.10.1155/2020/8831120Search in Google Scholar

[11] Menkulasi F, Roberts-Wollmann CL. Behavior of horizontal shear connections for full-depth precast concrete bridge decks on pre-stressed I-girders. PCI J. 2005;50(3):60–73.10.15554/pcij.05012005.60.73Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dalehenley M. Shear connections for the development of a full-depth precast concrete deck system [dissertation]. College Station: Texas A&M University; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Scholz DP, Wallenfelsz JA, Lijeron C, Roberts-Wollmann CL. Recommendations for the connection between full-depth precast bridge deck panel systems and precast I-beams. Report No. VTRC 07-CR17. Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Xue W, Ding M, Wang H, Luo Z. Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors. J Bridge Eng. 2008;13(6):623–34.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(623)Search in Google Scholar

[15] Xue W, Yang X. Seismic tests of precast concrete, moment-resisting frames and connections. PCI J. 2010;55(3):102–21.10.15554/pcij.06012010.102.121Search in Google Scholar

[16] Alcocer SM, Carranza R, Perez-Navarrete D, Martinez R. Seismic tests of beam-to-column connections in a precast concrete frame. PCI J. 2002;47(3):70–89.10.15554/pcij.05012002.70.89Search in Google Scholar

[17] Choi HK, Choi YC, Choi CS. Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections. Eng Struct. 2013;56:1820–35.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.021Search in Google Scholar

[18] Vidjeapriya R, Jaya KP. Experimental study on two simple mechanical precast beam-column connections under reverse cyclic loading. J Perform Constr Facil. 2013;27(4):402–14.10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000324Search in Google Scholar

[19] Vidjeapriya R, Jaya KP. Behaviour of precast beam-column mechanical connections under cyclic loading. Asian J Civil Eng (Building Housing). 2012;13:233–45.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Al-Salloum YA, Alrubaidi MA, Elsanadedy HM, Almusallam TH, Iqbal RA. Strengthening of precast RC beam-column connections for progressive collapse mitigation using bolted steel plates. Eng Struct. 2018;161:146–60.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.009Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wu X, Kang TH, Lin Y, Hwang HJ. Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams with precast High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composite permanent form. Compos Struct. 2018;200:829–38.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[22] Afefy HM, Kassem NM, Taher SE. Capacity Magnification by Imposing Composite Action of Precast Concrete Flanged Girders. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2018;22(7):2390–405.10.1007/s12205-017-1563-0Search in Google Scholar

[23] AL-Rubaye MM. Yousef RF, Muteb HH. Experimental Evaluation of Bond Strength Performance between Normal Concrete Substrate and Different Overlay Materials. J Eng Sci Technol. 2020;15(6):4367–82.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Peng K, Yan B. Experimental study of the flexural behaviour of ultra-high-performance concrete beam with wet joint. Mag Concr Res. 2022;74(2):70–80.10.1680/jmacr.20.00078Search in Google Scholar

[25] Qi JN, Ma ZJ, Wang JQ, Liu TX. Post-cracking shear strength and deformability of HSS-UHPFRC beams. Struct Concr. 2016;17(6):1033–46.10.1002/suco.201500191Search in Google Scholar

[26] Al-Osta MA, Isa MN, Baluch MH, Rahman MK. Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2017;134:279–96.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.094Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mosallam AS, Feo L, Elsadek A, Pul SE, Penna R. Structural evaluation of axial and rotational flexibility and strength of web–flange junctions of open-web pultruded composites. Compos, Part B Eng. 2014;66:311–27.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.018Search in Google Scholar

[28] Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E. Oller S, Onate E. A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int J Solids Struct. 1999;25(3):299–326.10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4Search in Google Scholar

[29] Lee J, Fenves GL. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. J Eng Mech. 1998;124(8):892–900.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)Search in Google Scholar

[30] Bahij S, Adekunle SK, Al-Osta M, Ahmad S, Al-Dulaijan SU, Rahman MK. Numerical investigation of the shear behavior of reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete beams. Struct Concr. 2018;19(1):305–17.10.1002/suco.201700062Search in Google Scholar

[31] Bahraq AA, Al-Osta MA, Ahmad S, Al-Zahrani MM, Al-Dulaijan SO, Rahman MK. Experimental and numerical investigation of shear behavior of RC beams strengthened by ultra-high-performance concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater. 2019;13(1):1–19.10.1186/s40069-018-0330-zSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Birtel VA, Mark P. Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure. 19th Annual Worldwide ABAQUS Users’ Conference; 2006 May 23-25; Cambridge (MA), USA. 2006;14:95–108.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Demir A, Ozturk H, Dok G. 3D numerical modeling of RC deep beam behavior by nonlinear finite element analysis. Disaster Sci Eng. 2016;2(1):13–8.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Metwally IM. Nonlinear analysis of concrete deep beam reinforced with gfrp bars using finite element method. Malaysian J Civ Eng. 2014;26(2).Search in Google Scholar

[35] ASTM A C150/C150M-17. Standard specification for Portland cement. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[36] ASTM C33-07. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. National laboratories. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[37] ASTM C494. Standard Specifications for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2013.Search in Google Scholar