Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access June 6, 2022

Penalty partial reduced selective integration: a new method to solve locking phenomena in thin shell steel and concrete structures

  • Roberto Nascimbene EMAIL logo

Abstract

The shell structures are commonly used in many civil and industrial and long-span logistic applications. In this research we simply start by applying a degenerated finite element continuum approach. Then we propose a new alternative formulation by splitting the shear energy into two main components, the first one exactly integrated, whereas the second reduced integrated in a proper way. In this numerical and analytical research we present this advanced new approach (herein named penalty partial reduced selective integration) by adding weight coefficients to the splitting energy terms. As a consequence of this formulation, the unwanted locking events are definitively eliminated. A wide range of real and analytical examples, from scientific literature and practical engineering shell design situations, are analyzed and deeply investigated to better understand the level of accuracy and effectiveness of the formulation proposed. Furthermore, comparisons withwell defined and established shell finite elements are made just to yield insight into the predictive capability of the penalty partial reduced selective integration, herein proposed and studied. Hence many examples are used to test this new formulation in order to analyze the numerical behavior of the approximate solution in dependence of the splitting parameters. A simple kind of methodological rules for choosing these numerical non-dimensional parameters are also given.

References

[1] Rotter JM, Mackenzie G, Lee M. Spherical Dome Buckling With Edge Ring Support. Structures. 2016;8:264–274.10.1016/j.istruc.2016.05.008Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sadowski AJ, Rotter M, Nielsen J. A theory for pressures in cylindrical silos under concentric mixed flow. Chem Eng Sci. 2020;223:115748.10.1016/j.ces.2020.115748Search in Google Scholar

[3] EN 1993-1-6:2007/A1:2017 – Eurocode 3 – Design of steel structures – Part 1-6: Strength and Stability of Shell Structures.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hu P, Xia Y, Tang L. A four-node Reissner-Mindlin shell with assumed displacement quasi-conforming method. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2011;73:103–6.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cai YC, Tian LG, Atluri SN. A simple locking–free discrete shear triangular plate element. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2011;77:221–238.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Choi CK, Lee TY. Eflcient remedy for membrane locking of 4-node flat shell elements by non-conforming modes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2003;192(16-18):1961–1971.10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00203-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gal E, Levy R, Geometrically nonlinear analysis of shell structures using a flat triangular shell finite element. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2006;13(3):331–388.10.1007/BF02736397Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ahmad S, Irons BM, Zienkiewicz OC. Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1970;2(3):419–451.10.1002/nme.1620020310Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gallagher RH. Finite element analysis: Fundamentals. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Div; 1975.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Flajs R, Cen S, Saje M. On convergence of nonconforming convex quadrilateral finite elements AGQ6. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199(25-28):1816–1827.10.1016/j.cma.2010.02.006Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lomboy GR, Suthasupradit S, Kim KD, Onate E. Nonlinear formulations of a four-node quasi-conforming shell element. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2009;16(2):189–250.10.1007/s11831-009-9030-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] Simo JC, Rifai MS. A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes, Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1990;29(8):1595–1638.10.1002/nme.1620290802Search in Google Scholar

[13] Alves de Sousa RJ, Natal Jorge RM, Fontes Valente RA, Cesar de Sa JM. A new volumetric and shear locking–free 3D enhanced strain element. Eng Comput. 2003;20(7):896–925.10.1108/02644400310502036Search in Google Scholar

[14] Cardoso RP, Yoon JW, Mahardika M, Choudhry S, Alves de Sousa RJ, Fontes Valente RA. Enhanced assumed strain (EAS) and assumed natural strain (ANS) methods for one-point quadrature solid-shell elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2008;75(2):156–187.10.1002/nme.2250Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kulikov GM, Plotnikova SV. A family of ANS four-node exact geometry shell elements in general convected curvilinear coordinates. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2010;83(10):1367–1406.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cardoso RP, Yoon JW, Fontes Valente RA. A new approach to reduce membrane and transverse shear locking for one-point quadrature shell elements: linear formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2006;66(2):214–249.10.1002/nme.1548Search in Google Scholar

[17] Alves de Sousa RJ, Cardoso RP, Fontes Valente RA, Yoon JW, Gracio JJ, Jorge RM. A new one-point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid-shell element with multiple integration points along thickness: part I-geometrically linear applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2005;62(7):952–977.10.1002/nme.1226Search in Google Scholar

[18] Cesar de Sa JM, Jorge MN, Fontes Valente RA, Areias PM. Development of shear locking–free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2002;53(7):1721–1750.10.1002/nme.360Search in Google Scholar

[19] Abed-Meraim F, Comberscure A. An improved assumed strain solid-shell element formulation with physical stabilization for geometric non–linear applications and elastic-plastic stability analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2009;80(13):1640–1686.10.1002/nme.2676Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kasper EP, Taylor RL. A mixed–enhanced strain method Part I: geometrically linear problems. Comput Struc. 2000;75(3):237–250.10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00134-0Search in Google Scholar

[21] Reese S. A large deformation solid-shell concept based on reduced integration with hourglass stabilization. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2007;69(8):1671–1716.10.1002/nme.1827Search in Google Scholar

[22] Schwarze M, Reese S. A reduced integration solid-shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept – Geometrically linear problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2009;80(10):1322–1355.10.1002/nme.2653Search in Google Scholar

[23] Brezzi F, Bathe KJ, Fortin M. Mixed-interpolated elements for Reissner-Mindlin plates. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1990;28(8):1787–1801.10.1002/nme.1620280806Search in Google Scholar

[24] Nascimbene R, Venini P. A new locking-free equilibrium mixed element for plane elasticity with continuous displacement interpolation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2001;191(17-18):1843–1860.10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00356-5Search in Google Scholar

[25] Arnold DN, Brezzi F,Marini LD. A family of discontinuous Galerkin finite elements for the Reissner-Mindlin plate. J Sci Comput. 2005;22(1-3):25–45.10.1007/s10915-004-4134-8Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Too JM. Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1971;3(2):275–290.10.1002/nme.1620030211Search in Google Scholar

[27] Chinosi C, Lovadina C. Mixed finite elements for Reissner-Mindlin plate model. In: Papadrakakis M, Topping BH, editors. Advances in Finite Element Techniques. CST; 1994. p. 33–38.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nascimbene R. An arbitrary cross section, locking free shearflexible curved beam finite element. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech. 2013;14(2):90–103.10.1080/15502287.2012.698706Search in Google Scholar

[29] Nascimbene R, Towards Non–Standard Numerical Modeling of Thin-Shell Structures: Geometrically Linear Formulation. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech. 2014;15(2):126–141.10.1080/15502287.2013.874058Search in Google Scholar

[30] MacNeal RH, Harder RL. A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy. Fin Elem Anal Des. 1985;1(1):3–20.10.1016/0168-874X(85)90003-4Search in Google Scholar

[31] Krysl P, Belytschko T. Analysis of thin shells by the element–free Galerkin method. Int J Solids Struct. 1996;33(20-22):3057–3080.10.1016/0020-7683(95)00265-0Search in Google Scholar

[32] Noguchi H, Kawashima T, Miyamura T. Element free analyses of shell and spatial structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2000;47(6):1215–1240.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000228)47:6<1215::AID-NME834>3.0.CO;2-MSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Clough RW, and Tocher JL. Finite element stiffness matrices for analysis of plates in bending, Proceedings of the Conference on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics; 1965 Oct 26-28; Wright- Patterson Air Force Base; Dayton (OH), USA. 1965. p. 515–545.Search in Google Scholar

[34] MacNeal RH. Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed strain distributions. Nucl Eng Des. 1982;70(1):3–12.10.1016/0029-5493(82)90262-XSearch in Google Scholar

[35] Hughes TJ, Tezduyar TE. Finite elements based upon Mindlin plate theory with particular reference to the four-node bilinear isoparametric element. J Appl Mech. 1981;48(3):587–596.10.1115/1.3157679Search in Google Scholar

[36] Sze KY, Yao LQ. A hybrid stress ANS solid-shell element and its generalization for smart structure modelling. Part I – solid-shell element formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2000;48(4):545–564.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000610)48:4<545::AID-NME889>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar

[37] Kim KD, Liu GZ, Han SC. A resultant 8-node solid-shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis. Comput Mech. 2005;35:315–331.10.1007/s00466-004-0606-9Search in Google Scholar

[38] Simo JC, Fox DD, Rifai MS. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part II, The linear theory; Computational aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1989;73(1):53–92.10.1016/0045-7825(89)90098-4Search in Google Scholar

[39] Legay A, Combescure A. Elastoplastic stability analysis of shells using the physically stabilized finite element SHB8PS. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2003;57(9):1299–1322.10.1002/nme.728Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-09
Accepted: 2022-05-12
Published Online: 2022-06-06

© 2022 Roberto Nascimbene, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 9.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cls-2022-0027/html
Scroll Up Arrow