Abstract
Lexical diversity, the amount of lexical variation shown by a particular concept, varies between concepts. For the concept drunk, for instance, nearly 3000 English expressions exist, including blitzed, intoxicated, and hammered. For the concept sober, however, a significantly smaller number of lexical items is available, like sober or abstinent. While earlier variation studies have revealed that meaning-related concept characteristics correlate with the amount of lexical variation, these studies were limited in scope, being restricted to one semantic field and to one dialect area, that of the Limburgish dialects of Dutch. In this paper, we investigate whether the impact of concept characteristics, viz. vagueness, lack of salience and proneness to affect, is manifest in a similar way in other dialects and other semantic fields. In particular, by extending the scope of the earlier studies to other carefully selected semantic fields, we investigate the generalizability of the impact of concept characteristics to the lexicon as a whole. The quantitative approach that we employ to measure concept characteristics and lexical diversity methodologically advances the study of linguistic variation. Theoretically, this paper contributes to the further development of Cognitive Sociolinguistics by showcasing how meaning can be a source of lexical diversity.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to three anonymous reviewers and to the Editor-in-Chief and the Outgoing Editor-in-Chief for their useful suggestions to an earlier version of this paper. This study was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, grant no. G042114N).
References
Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 1988. Euphemism, dysphemism, and cross-varietal synonymy. La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511617881Search in Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1978. Ethnobiological classification. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 9–26. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent, Dennis E. Breedlove & Peter H. Raven. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75(1). 214–242.10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140Search in Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Paweł Mandera, Samantha McCormick & Emmanuel Keuleers. 2018. Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 1–13.10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9Search in Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Michaël Stevens, Simon De Deyne, Wouter Voorspoels & Gert Storms. 2014. Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica 150. 80–84.10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010Search in Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, Jos Swanenberg, Wilbert Heeringa & Folkert De Vriend. 2016. The relationship between first language acquisition and dialect variation: Linking resources from distinct disciplines in a CLARIN-NL project. Lingua 178. 32–45.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.007Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2009. Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSearch in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Dagmar Divjak. 2015. Introduction. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 39), 1–9. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Daems, Jocelyne, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2015. Wat dragen we vandaag: Een hemd met blazer of een shirt met jasje? Convergentie en divergentie binnen Nederlandse kledingtermen [What to wear today: A shirt with a blazer or a shirt with a jacket? Convergence and divergence in Dutch clothing terminology]. Taal En Tongval: Variation in the Low Countries 67(2). 307–342.10.5117/TET2015.2.DAEMSearch in Google Scholar
Franco, Karlien & Dirk Geeraerts. Forthcoming. Botany meets lexicology: The relationship between experiential salience and lexical diversity. In Janice Fon (ed.), Dimensions of diffusion and diversity (Cognitive Linguistics Research 63), 113–146. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993. Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4(3). 223–272.10.1515/cogl.1993.4.3.223Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2005. Lectal variation and empirical data in Cognitive Linguistics. In Sandra Peña Cervel & Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Cognitive linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interactions (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32), 163–189. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2015. Sense individuation. In Nick Riemer (ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics, 233–247. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2017. Entrenchment as onomasiological salience. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (Language and the Human Lifespan 3), 153–174. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1037/15969-008Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema. 1994. The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context (Cognitive Linguistics Research 5). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110873061Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Speelman. 1999. Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat: Een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen [Convergence and divergence in the Dutch lexicon: A study on clothing and soccer terminology]. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.). 2010. Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 45). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110226461Search in Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Dirk Speelman. 2010. Heterodox concept features and onomasiological heterogeneity in dialects. In Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.), Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 45), 23–39. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110226461Search in Google Scholar
Gorman, Aloysia M. 1961. Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(1). 23–29.10.1037/h0040561Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. Polysemy. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 39), 472–490. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts. 2011. A statistical method for the identification and aggregation of regional linguistic variation. Language Variation and Change 23(2). 193–221.10.1017/S095439451100007XSearch in Google Scholar
Hallgren, Kevin A. 2012. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 8(1). 23–34.10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023Search in Google Scholar
Harder, Peter. 2003. The status of linguistic facts: Rethinking the relation between cognition, social institution and utterance from a functional point of view. Mind & Language 18(1). 52–76.10.1111/1468-0017.00214Search in Google Scholar
Hargis, Charles H. & Edward E. Gickling. 1978. The function of imagery in word recognition development. The Reading Teacher 31(8). 870–874.Search in Google Scholar
Heylen, Kris & Tom Ruette. 2013. Degrees of semantic control in measuring aggregated lexical distances. In Lars Borin & Anju Saxena (eds.), Approaches to measuring linguistic differences (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 265), 353–374. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110305258.353Search in Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow. 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, vii – xxviii. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Keuleers, Emmanuel, Michaël Stevens, Paweł Mandera & Marc Brysbaert. 2015. Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68(8). 1–62.10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560Search in Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte & René Dirven (eds.). 2008. Cognitive Sociolinguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 39). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110199154Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 340–371. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.195Search in Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 2007. Polysemy, prototypes and radial categories. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 139–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lillo, Antonio. 2009. Drunk: The definitive drinker’s dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography 23(2). 242–245.10.1093/ijl/ecp035Search in Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Niclas Burenhult. 2014. Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition 130(2). 266–270.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004Search in Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2002. Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change. Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1). 3–15.10.1111/1467-9481.00174Search in Google Scholar
Moors, Agnes, Jan De Houwer, Dirk Hermans, Sabina Wanmaker, Kevin Van Schie, Anne-Laura Van Harmelen, Maarten De Schryver, Jeffrey De Winne & Marc Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods 45(1). 169–177.10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8Search in Google Scholar
Paivio, Allan. 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach (Oxford Psychology Series 9). New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pickl, Simon. 2013. Lexical meaning and spatial distribution. Evidence from geostatistical dialectometry. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28(1). 63–81.10.1093/llc/fqs050Search in Google Scholar
Pütz, Martin, Justyna A. Robinson & Monika Reif (eds.). 2014. Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use (Benjamins Current Topics 59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.59Search in Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. Why Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557.10.1515/cog-2016-0048Search in Google Scholar
Sinha, Chris & Kristine Jensen de López. 2001. Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2). 17–41.10.1515/cogl.2001.008Search in Google Scholar
Soares Da Silva, Augusto. 2010. Measuring and parameterizing lexical convergence and divergence between European and Brazilian Portuguese. In Dirk Geeraerts, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.), Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 45), 41–83. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110226461.41Search in Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk & Dirk Geeraerts. 2007. De structuur van lexicale onzekerheid [The structure of lexical insecurity]. Taal & Tongval 20. 47–61.Search in Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk & Dirk Geeraerts. 2008. The role of concept characteristics in lexical dialectometry. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2(1–2). 221–242.10.3366/E1753854809000408Search in Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Geeraerts. 2003. Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities 37(3). 317–337.10.1023/A:1025019216574Search in Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1955. Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 21(2). 121–137.10.1086/464321Search in Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos. 2000. Lexicale variatie cognitief-semantisch benaderd: Over het benoemen van vogels in Zuid-Nederlandse dialecten [Lexical variation from a cognitive-semantic perspective: On naming birds in the Southern Dutch dialects]. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos. 2004. Kolbloemen, bloedpaters en manebladen versus zoetelief en luitentuit. Bronnen van lexicale variatie in de Brabantse flora en fauna [‘kolbloemen’, ‘bloedpaters’ and ‘manebladen’ versus ‘zoetelief’ and ‘luitentuit’. Sources of lexical variation in the Brabantic flora and fauna]. Taal & Tongval 56. 19–47.Search in Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos. 2010. Als het beestje maar een naam heeft [As long as the animal has a name]. In Johan Rooryck, Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck, Guido Vanden Wyngaerd, Johan De Caluwe & Jacques Van Keymeulen (eds.), Voor Magda: Artikelen voor Magda Devos bij haar afscheid van de Universiteit Gent, 561–568. Gent: Academia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Szelid, Veronika & Dirk Geeraerts. 2008. Usage-based dialectology. Emotion concepts in the Southern Csango dialect. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6(1). 23–49.10.1075/arcl.6.03szeSearch in Google Scholar
Tadmor, Uri. 2009. Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages, 55–75. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110218442.55Search in Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Social structure, language contact and language change. In Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone & Paul Kerswill (eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics, 236–248. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781446200957.n18Search in Google Scholar
WBD. 1967–2005. Woordenboek van de Brabantse dialecten [dictionary of the Brabantic dialects]. Assen: Van Gorcum / Amsterdam: Gopher.Search in Google Scholar
Weijnen, Antonius A. 1966. Nederlandse Dialectkunde [Dutch dialectology] (Studia Theodisca 10). Assen: Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn, Clive Upton & Ann Thompson. 2014. Analyzing the BBC voices data: Contemporary English dialect areas and their characteristic lexical variants. Literary and Linguistic Computing 29(1). 107–117.10.1093/llc/fqt009Search in Google Scholar
WLD. 1983–2008. Woordenboek van de Limburgse dialecten [dictionary of the Limburgish dialects]. Assen: Van Gorcum / Amsterdam: Gopher.Search in Google Scholar
Zenner, Eline, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts. 2012. Cognitive Sociolinguistics meets loanword research: Measuring variation in the success of anglicisms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 749–792.10.1515/9783110335255.251Search in Google Scholar
Zuur, Alain F, Elena N. Ieno, Neil J. Walker, Anatoly A. Saveliev & Graham M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Statistics for Biology and Health). New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston