Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 5, 2018

Florent Perek: Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Constructional Approaches to Language 17

Elitzur Dattner
From the journal Cognitive Linguistics

References

Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language. 82(4). 711–733.Search in Google Scholar

Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions, Special Volume 1. 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In Hubert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, Renِé Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 49–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldwater, Micah B., Mark T. Tomlinson, Catharina H. Echols & Bradley C. Love. 2011. Structural priming as structure-mapping: Children use analogies from previous utterances to guide sentence production. Cognitive Science 35. 156–170.Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2012. Alternation-based generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a sorting task experiment. Cognitive Linguistics 23(3). 601–635.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan T. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.Search in Google Scholar

Vasilyeva, Marina & Heidi Waterfall. 2011. Beyond syntactic priming: Evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures. Journal of Child Language 39(2). 1–26.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-1-26
Accepted: 2018-1-26
Published Online: 2018-5-5
Published in Print: 2018-5-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston