Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 1, 2020

Note on Dolbeault cohomology and Hodge structures up to bimeromorphisms

  • Daniele Angella EMAIL logo , Tatsuo Suwa , Nicoletta Tardini and Adriano Tomassini
From the journal Complex Manifolds

Abstract

We construct a simply-connected compact complex non-Kähler manifold satisfying the ∂ ̅∂ -Lemma, and endowed with a balanced metric. To this aim, we were initially aimed at investigating the stability of the property of satisfying the ∂ ̅∂-Lemma under modifications of compact complex manifolds and orbifolds. This question has been recently addressed and answered in [34, 39, 40, 50] with different techniques. Here, we provide a different approach using Čech cohomology theory to study the Dolbeault cohomology of the blowup ̃XZ of a compact complex manifold X along a submanifold Z admitting a holomorphically contractible neighbourhood.

MSC 2010: 32Q99; 32C35; 32S45

References

[1] M. Abate, F. Bracci, T. Suwa, F. Tovena, Localization of Atiyah classes, Rev. Mat. Iberoam.29 (2013), 547–578.10.4171/RMI/730Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. Abramovich, K. Karu, K. Matsuki, J. Włodarczyk, Torification and factorization of birational maps, J. Amer. Math. Soc.15 (2002), no. 3, 531–572.Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Alessandrini, G. Bassanelli, The class of compact balanced manifolds is invariant under modifications, Complex analysis and geometry (Trento, 1993), 1–17, Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., 173, Dekker, New York, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. Angella, H. Kasuya, Bott-Chern cohomology of solvmanifolds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom.52 (2017), no. 4, 363–411.Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. Angella, H. Kasuya, Cohomologies of deformations of solvmanifolds and closedness of some properties, North-West. Eur. J. Math.3 (2017), 75–105.Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. Angella, N. Tardini, Quantitative and qualitative cohomological properties for non-Kähler manifolds. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.145 (2017) no. 1, 273–285.Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. Angella, A. Tomassini, On the ∂ ̅∂-Lemma and Bott-Chern cohomology, Invent. Math.192 (2013), no. 1, 71–81.Search in Google Scholar

[8] W. L. Baily, On the quotient of an analytic manifold by a group of analytic homeomorphisms, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.40 (1954), no. 9, 804–808.Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. L. Baily, The decomposition theorem for V-manifolds, Amer. J. Math.78 (1956), no. 4, 862–888.Search in Google Scholar

[10] G. Bazzoni, M. Fernández, V. Muñoz, A 6-dimensional simply connected complex and symplectic manifold with no Kähler metric, J. Symplectic Geom.16 (2018), no. 4, 1001–1020.Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Blanchard, Sur les variétés analytiques complexes, Ann. Sci. l’É.N.S.73 (1956), no 2, 157–202.10.24033/asens.1045Search in Google Scholar

[12] N. Buchdahl, On compact Kähler surfaces, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)49 (1999), no. 1, vii, xi, 287–302.Search in Google Scholar

[13] F. Campana, The class 𝒞is not stable by small deformations, Math. Ann.290 (1991), no. 1, 19–30.Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Ceballos, A. Otal, L. Ugarte, R. Villacampa, Invariant complex structures on 6-nilmanifolds: classification, Frölicher spectral sequence and special Hermitian metrics, J. Geom. Anal.26 (2016), no. 1, 252–286.Search in Google Scholar

[15] L.A. Cordero, M. Fernández, A. Gray and L. Ugarte, Compact nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex structures: Dolbeault cohomology, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.352 (2000), no. 12, 5405–5433.Search in Google Scholar

[16] P. Deligne, Ph. A. Griffiths, J. Morgan, D. P. Sullivan, Real homotopy theory of Kähler manifolds, Invent. Math.29 (1975), no. 3, 245–274.Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Fernández, V. Muñoz, An 8-dimensional nonformal, simply connected, symplectic manifold, Ann. of Math. (2)167 (2008), no. 3, 1045–1054.Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. Friedman, On threefolds with trivial canonical bundle, Complex geometry and Lie theory (Sundance, UT, 1989), 103–134, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 53, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1991.10.1090/pspum/053/1141199Search in Google Scholar

[19] R. Friedman, The ∂ ̅∂-lemma for general Clemens manifolds, Pure Appl. Math. Q.15 (2019), no. 4, 1001–1028.Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Frölicher, Relations between the cohomology groups of Dolbeault and topological invariants, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.41 (1955), 641–644.10.1073/pnas.41.9.641Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] W. Fulton, Intersection theory, Second edition, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3, Folge, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, 2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ph. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Reprint of the 1978 original, Wiley Classics Library, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[23] K. Hasegawa, Minimal models of nilmanifolds, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.106 (1989), no. 1, 65–71.Search in Google Scholar

[24] H. Hironaka, An example of a non-Kählerian complex-analytic deformation of Kählerian complex structures, Ann. Math. (2)75 (1962), no. 1, 190–208.Search in Google Scholar

[25] N. Honda, T. Izawa, T. Suwa, Sato hyperfunctions via relative Dolbeault cohomology, arXiv:1807.01831 [math.CV], 2018Search in Google Scholar

[26] H. Kasuya, Hodge symmetry and decomposition on non-Kähler solvmanifolds, J. Geom. Phys.76 (2014), 61–65.10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. Lamari, Courants kählériens et surfaces compactes, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)49 (1999), no. 1, vii, x, 263–285.Search in Google Scholar

[28] C. LeBrun, Y.S. Poon, Twistors, Kähler manifolds, and bimeromorphic geometry. II, J. Am. Math. Soc.5 (1992), no. 2, 317–325.Search in Google Scholar

[29] I. Nakamura, Complex parallelisable manifolds and their small deformations, J. Differential Geometry10 (1975), 85–112.10.4310/jdg/1214432677Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. Nomizu, On the cohomology of compact homogeneous spaces of nilpotent Lie groups, Ann. of Math. (2)59 (1954), no. 3, 531–538.Search in Google Scholar

[31] D. Popovici, Stability of strongly Gauduchon manifolds under modifications, J. Geom. Anal.23 (2013), no. 2, 653–659.Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. Popovici, Aeppli cohomology classes associated with Gauduchon metrics on compact complex manifolds, Bull. Soc. Math. France143 (2015), no. 4, 763–800.Search in Google Scholar

[33] D. Popovici, Volume and self-intersection of differences of two nef classes, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5)17 (2017), no. 4, 1255–1299.Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Rao, S. Yang, X. Yang, Dolbeault cohomologies of blowing up complex manifolds, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)130 (2019), 68–92.10.1016/j.matpur.2019.01.016Search in Google Scholar

[35] Y. Sakane, On compact complex parallelisable solvmanifolds, Osaka J. Math.13 (1976), no. 1, 187–212.Search in Google Scholar

[36] I. Satake, On a generalization of the notion of manifold, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.42 (1956), no. 6, 359–363.Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. Schweitzer, Autour de la cohomologie de Bott-Chern, Prépublication de l’Institut Fourier no. 703 (2007), arXiv:0709.3528.Search in Google Scholar

[38] J. Stelzig, Double Complexes and Mixed Hodge Structures as Vector Bundles, PhD thesis, WWU, Münster, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[39] J. Stelzig, The Double Complex of a Blow-up, to appear in Internat. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz139, arXiv:1808.02882.10.1093/imrn/rnz139Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Stelzig, On the Structure of Double Complexes, arXiv:1812.00865.Search in Google Scholar

[41] T. Suwa, Indices of vector fields and residues of singular holomorphic foliations, Actualités Mathématiques, Hermann, Paris, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[42] T. Suwa, Residue theoretical approach to intersection theory, Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc.459 (2008), 207–261.10.1090/conm/459/08972Search in Google Scholar

[43] T. Suwa, Čech-Dolbeault cohomology and the ̅∂-Thom class, Singularities—Niigata—Toyama 2007, 321–340, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., 56, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[44] T. Suwa, Relative Dolbeault cohomology, arXiv:1903.04710.Search in Google Scholar

[45] N. Tardini, Relative Čech-Dolbeault homology and applications, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 199 (2020), no. 3, 985–995.Search in Google Scholar

[46] V. Tosatti, B. Weinkove, Hermitian metrics, (n − 1, n − 1) forms and Monge-Ampère equations, J. Reine Angew. Math.755 (2019), 67–10110.1515/crelle-2017-0017Search in Google Scholar

[47] C. Voisin, Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry. I, Translated from the French by Leila Schneps, Reprint of the 2002 English edition, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 76, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[48] V. Vuletescu, Exemples de faisceaux cohérents sans résolution localement libre en dimension 3, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris350 (2012), no. 7-8, 411–412.Search in Google Scholar

[49] J. Włodarczyk, Toroidal varieties and the weak factorization theorem, Invent. Math.154 (2003), no. 2, 223–331.Search in Google Scholar

[50] S. Yang, X. Yang, Bott-Chern blow-up formula and bimeromorphic invariance of the ∂ ̅∂-Lemma for threefolds, arXiv:1712.08901.Search in Google Scholar

[51] R. O. Wells, Comparison of de Rham and Dolbeault cohomology for proper surjective mappings, Pacific J. Math.53 (1974), 281–300.10.2140/pjm.1974.53.281Search in Google Scholar

[52] C.-C. Wu, On the geometry of superstrings with torsion, Thesis (Ph.D.)Harvard University, Proquest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-16
Accepted: 2020-08-17
Published Online: 2020-09-01

© 2020 Daniele Angella et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 27.3.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/coma-2020-0103/html
Scroll Up Arrow