Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 18, 2020

The concept of integrated communication under close scrutiny: A study on the effects of congruity-based tactics

Alena Kirchenbauer
From the journal Communications

Abstract

This study examines how consumers react to a Facebook post that is completely, moderately or not at all in conflict with a brand-typical TV clip. It thus analyzes the need for congruity between the offline and online advertising activities of a brand and draws on the literature of integrated communication, schema incongruity theory and advertising effectiveness. Results of an online experiment with 131 participants and a 2 (content: congruent vs. incongruent) by 2 (stylistic devices: congruent vs. incongruent) between-subjects design provide first insights into the modeling of (in)congruity based on integrated communication. Thus, the article presents a first attempt to conceptualize (in)congruity in advertising through a combination of content and stylistic devices. In addition to this research agenda, the manuscript offers implications for advertising practice.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Michael Schenk and Julia Niemann-Lenz for their helpful advice regarding this study.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1992). Managing the most important assets: Brand equity. Planning Review, 20(5), 56–58.Search in Google Scholar

Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 203–231.Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, M. M., Brocato, E. D., & Vijayalakshmi, A. (2017). The role of medium content and ad format congruity in influencing advertising outcomes. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(4), 371–384.Search in Google Scholar

Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F., & Schwarz, N. (1994). Need for cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: A scale for measuring dedication to, and pleasure in, brainteasers]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154.Search in Google Scholar

Brosius, H.-B., Haas, A., & Koschel, F. (2012). Methoden der empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Eine Einführung [Methods of empirical communication research. An introduction]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Search in Google Scholar

Bruhn, M. (1995). Integrierte Unternehmenskommunikation. Ansatzpunkte für eine strategische und operative Umsetzung integrierter Kommunikationsarbeit [Integrated corporate communication. Approach to a strategic and operative implementation of integrated communication]. Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschel.Search in Google Scholar

Bruhn, M. (2014). Integrierte Unternehmens- und Marketingkommunikation. Handbuch für ein integriertes Kommunikationsmanagement [Integrated corporate and marketing communication. Handbook for an integrated communication management]. München: Vahlen.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., Törn, F., & Öhman, N. (2008). Could placing ads wrong be right? Advertising effects of thematic incongruence. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 57–67.Search in Google Scholar

Delgado-Ballester, E., Navarro, A., & Sicilia, M. (2012). Revitalising brands through communication messages: The role of brand familiarity. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/2), 31–51.Search in Google Scholar

Esch, F.-R. (2011). Wirkung integrierter Kommunikation. Ein verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Ansatz für die Werbung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Search in Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-based applications and extensions in advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 87–99.Search in Google Scholar

Halkias, G., & Kokkinaki, F. (2013). Increasing advertising effectiveness through incongruity-based tactics: The moderating role of consumer involvement. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(3), 182–197.Search in Google Scholar

Halkias, G., & Kokkinaki, F. (2014). The degree of ad-brand incongruity and the distinction between schema-driven and stimulus-driven attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 397–409.Search in Google Scholar

Halkias, G., & Kokkinaki, F. (2017). Schema strength, processing opportunity, and the rewarding nature of incongruity resolution in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 415–438 [Effectiveness of integrated communication. A behavioural science approach to advertising]Search in Google Scholar

Han, S., Choi, J., Kim, H., Davis, J. A., & Lee, K.-Y. (2013). The effectiveness of image congruence and the moderating effects of sponsor motive and cheering event fit in sponsorship. International Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 301–317.Search in Google Scholar

Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475–492.Search in Google Scholar

Huhmann, B. A., & Albinsson, P. A. (2012). Does rhetoric impact advertising effectiveness with liking controlled? European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1476–1500.Search in Google Scholar

Kapferer, J.-N., & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumers’ involvement profile: New empirical results. In E. C. Hirschman & M. B. Holbrook (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, volume 12 (vol. 12, pp. 290–295). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Search in Google Scholar

Kliatchko, J. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct. A revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 133–160.Search in Google Scholar

Leigh, J. H. (1994). The use of figures of speech in print ad headlines. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 17–33.Search in Google Scholar

MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130–143.Search in Google Scholar

Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clarke & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition. The 17th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Mayrhofer, M., Matthes, J., Einwiller, S., & Naderer, B. (2020). User generated content presenting brands on social media increases young adults’ purchase intention. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 166–186.Search in Google Scholar

Navarro-Bailón, M.-Á. (2012). Strategic consistent messages in crosstool campaigns: Effects on brand image and brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(3), 189–202.Search in Google Scholar

Rossiter, J. R., & Bergkvist, L. (2009). The importance of choosing one good item for single-item measures of attitude towards the ad and attitude towards the brand and its generalization to all measures. Transfer Werbeforschung & Praxis, 55(2), 8–18.Search in Google Scholar

Schach, A. (2015). Advertorial, Blogbeitrag, Content-Strategie & Co. Neue Texte der Unternehmenskommunikation [Advertorial, blog texts, content strategy etc. New kinds of texts in corporate communications]. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, L. M., & Vargas, P. (2007). Writing with pictures: Toward a unifying theory of consumer response to images. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 341–356.Search in Google Scholar

Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31–46.Search in Google Scholar

Thorson, E., Chi, A., & Leavitt, C. (1992). Attention, memory, attitude, and conation. A test of the advertising hierarchy. In J. F. Sherry & B. Sternthal (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (vol. 19, pp. 366–379). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Search in Google Scholar

Törn, F. (2012). Revisiting the match-up hypothesis: Effects of brand-incongruent celebrity endorsements. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 33(1), 20–36.Search in Google Scholar

Torp, S. M., & Andersen, L. P. (2018). Marketing rhetoric and the rhetoric of marketing. Manipulation or mutuality? In O. Ihlen & R. L. Heath (Eds.), The handbook of organizational rhetoric and communication (pp. 67–80). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Yoon, H. J. (2012). Understanding schema incongruity as a process in advertising: Review and future recommendations. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(5), 360–376.Search in Google Scholar

Appendix

Table A1: Stimuli of the main studyNote. Stimulus materials will be provided upon request.

Table A1:

Stimuli of the main study

Note. Stimulus materials will be provided upon request.

Published Online: 2020-04-18
Published in Print: 2020-09-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston