Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 4, 2020

The impact of communication models of public relations and organization–public relationships on company credibility and financial performance

Marko Vlahović, Milan Nikolić, Marko Ivaniš, Ivan Tasić and Edit Terek
From the journal Communications

Abstract

The paper presents the results of the study of the impact and effects of communication models of public relations and organization–public relationships on company credibility and financial performance in companies in Serbia. The data were obtained by interviewing 415 respondents (PR managers, PR practitioners and marketing experts) working in 93 companies in Serbia. The dimensions of the organization–public relationships have stronger positive influences and effects on company credibility and financial performance than the dimensions of communication models of public relations. The influence of the dimensions of trust, commitment, satisfaction and communal relationship is particularly emphasized. Of the four communication models, the strongest positive impact on company credibility and financial performance is achieved by the two-way symmetrical dimension, and then the two-way asymmetrical dimension. The dimensions of communication models of public relations and organization–public relationships have the greatest influence and predictive effect on the dimension of trustworthiness, followed by the dimension of expertise, and finally the dimension of financial performance. Therefore, a greater impact exists on company credibility than on financial performance.

References

Berger, B. K., & Reber, B. H. (2006). Gaining influence in public relations: The role of resistance in practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Black, S. (1993). The essential of public relations. London: Kogan Page Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Bruning, S. D., & Ledingham, J. A. (1999). Relationships between organizations and publics: Development of a multi-dimensional organization-public relationship scale. Public Relations Review, 25(2), 157–170.Search in Google Scholar

Cha, H., Song, Y., & Kim, J. R. (2010). Effects of issue ownership and issue obtrusiveness on corporate reputation at two Korean corporations. Public Relations Review, 36(3), 289–291.Search in Google Scholar

Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43.Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E. (1990). Theory and practice of interactive media relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 35(3), 18–23.Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1989). Toward a theory of the public relations behavior of organizations. Public Relations Research Annual, 1, 27–66.Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1992). Models of public relations and communication. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 285–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., Sriramesh, K., Huang, Y. H., & Lyra, A. (1995). Models of public relations in an international setting. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7(3), 163–186.Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E., & Huang, Y.-H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Guillory, J. E., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). How does web site interactivity affect our perceptions of an organization? Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(1), 44–61.Search in Google Scholar

Guiniven, J. E. (2002). Dealing with activism in Canada: An ideal cultural fit for the two-way symmetrical public relations model. Public Relations Review, 28(4), 393–402.Search in Google Scholar

Hon, L. C. (1998). Demonstrating effectiveness in public relations: Goals, objectives, and evaluation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(2), 103–135.Search in Google Scholar

Hon, L. C., & Brunner, B. (2002). Measuring public relationships among students and administrators at the University of Florida. Journal of Communication Management, 6(3), 227–238.Search in Google Scholar

Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainsville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y.-H. (2001a). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization–public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(1), 61–90.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y.-H. (2001b). Values of public relations: Effects on organization–public relationships mediating conflict resolution. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(4), 265–301.Search in Google Scholar

Hung, C.-j. F., & Chen, Y.-R. R. (2009). Types and dimensions of organization–public relationships in greater China. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 181–186.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, H. (2012). A model of work–life conflict and quality of employee–organization relationships (EORs): Transformational leadership, procedural justice, and family-supportive workplace initiatives. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 231–245.Search in Google Scholar

Jo, S., Hon, L. C., & Brunner, B. R. (2004). Organisation-public relationships: Measurement validation in a university setting. Journal of Communication Management, 9(1), 14–27.Search in Google Scholar

Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Kent, M. L., Taylor, M., & Turcilo, L. (2006). Public relations by newly privatized businesses in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 10–17.Search in Google Scholar

Kiambi, D. M., & Nadler, M. K. (2012). Public relations in Kenya: An exploration of models and cultural influences. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 505–507.Search in Google Scholar

Kiousis, S., Popescu, C., & Mitrook, M. (2007). Understanding influence on corporate reputation: An examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, public opinion, and financial performance from an agenda-building and agenda-setting perspective. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 147–165.Search in Google Scholar

Koch, T. (2016). Journalism or public relations? A quantitative survey of custom publishing editors in Germany. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 345–352.Search in Google Scholar

Kovačič, M. P., & Erjavec, K. (2010). Production process of unlabeled advertorials in the Slovenian press. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 35(4), 375–395.Search in Google Scholar

Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S., & Yoon, Y. (2010). Return on investment (ROI) of international public relations: A country-level analysis. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 15–20.Search in Google Scholar

Marney, J. (1998). The compelling corporate image: How and why good corporate advertising does more than just build goodwill. Marketing, 103, 29.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 25(3), 235–247.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolić, M., Đorđević, D., & Ćoćkalo, D. (2007). Research on certain aspects of PR function in Serbian companies. Journal for East European Management Studies, 12(2), 152–173.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolić, M., Savić, M., Ćoćkalo, D., Spasojević-Brkić, V., & Ivin, D. (2011). The impact of Serbian public relations on economic indices, Public Relations Review, 37(3), 332–335.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolić, M., Terek, E., Vukonjanski, J., & Đurin, S. (2012). The state of the PR profession in Serbian companies: A comparative study in 2006 and 2012. 19th international public relations symposium BledCom, Lake Bled, Slovenia. July 6–7, 92–96.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolić, M., Terek, E., Vukonjanski, J., & Ivin, D. (2012). The impact of internal communication on strategic and economic effects in Serbian companies. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 288–293.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolić, M., Vukonjanski, J., Nedeljković, M., Hadžić, O., & Terek, E. (2013). The impact of internal communication on job satisfaction dimensions and the moderating role of LMX. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 563–565.Search in Google Scholar

Pierach, J. (2002). PR must evolve to gain a seat at the table. Brandweek, 43, 41–42.Search in Google Scholar

Plowman, K. D. (2005). Conflict, strategic management, and public relations. Public Relations Review, 31(1), 131–138.Search in Google Scholar

Plowman, K. D. (2013). Creating a model to measure relationships: U.S. Army strategic communication. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 549–557.Search in Google Scholar

Podnar, K., Lah, M., & Golob, U. (2009). Economic perspectives on public relations. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 340–345.Search in Google Scholar

Sriramesh, K. (1992). Societal culture and public relations: Ethnographic evidence from India. Public Relations Review, 18(2), 201–211.Search in Google Scholar

Swart, C. (2012). Building organisation–public relationships: Towards an understanding of the challenges facing public relations. Communicatio – South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 38(3), 329–348.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, M. (2004). Exploring public relations in Croatia through relational communication and media richness theories. Public Relations Review, 30(2), 145–160.Search in Google Scholar

Tkalac Verčič, A., Lalić, D., & Vujičić, D. (2017). Journalists and public relations practitioners: Comparing two countries. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 527–536.Search in Google Scholar

Triantafillidou, A., & Yannas, P. (2014). How public relations agencies in Greece respond to digital trends. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 815–817.Search in Google Scholar

Vasquez, G. M., & Taylor, M. (2000). What cultural values influence American public relations practitioners? Public Relations Review, 25(4), 433–449.Search in Google Scholar

Verčič, D., & Tkalac Verčič, A. (2012). Public relations and lobbying: New legislation in Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 14–21.Search in Google Scholar

Verčič, D., Tkalac Verčič, A., & Laco, K. (2006). Coorientation theory in international relations: The case of Slovenia and Croatia. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, B., & Spinks, N. (1999). Media relations: Powerful tools for achieving service quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 9(4), 246–256.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D. L., & Cameron, G. T. (2010). Public relations (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, M.-Y., & Baah-Boakye, K. (2009). Public relations in Ghana: Work-related cultural values and public relations models. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 83–85.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-04
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston