Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 12, 2019

Gender role portrayals in television advertisements: Do channel characteristics matter?

Kathrin Karsay EMAIL logo , Jörg Matthes and Valerie Fröhlich
From the journal Communications

Abstract

In the present study we investigated the role of channel characteristics with regard to gender role portrayals in television advertisements. Drawing on cultivation theory and social cognitive theory, we investigated six key variables in this line of research. We sampled a total of N = 1022 advertisements from four Austrian television channels: a public service channel, a commercial channel, and one commercial special interest channel for men and for women, respectively. Our results replicate well-known stereotypic gender role portrayals prevalent in television advertisements. The public service channel and the private channel did not differentiate from each other with regards to gender stereotyping. We found that a channel with a female target group aired advertisements containing the same or even amplified stereotypes compared to a male channel. The potential negative effects of stereotypic gender role portrayals in television advertisements are discussed.

References

AMD-G (2010). Federal act on audio-visual media services. Retrieved April 3, 2018 from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Erv/ERV_2001_1_84/ERV_2001_1_84.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Teletest (2016). Marktanteile Sender monatlich [Channelsʼ monthly market share]. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://www.agtt.at/show_content.php?sid=22.Search in Google Scholar

Aronovsky, A., & Furnham, A. (2008). Gender portrayals in food commercials at different times of the day: A content analytic study. Communications, 33, 169–190.10.1515/COMMUN.2008.010Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (vol. 3, pp. 94–124). New York: Routledge.10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03Search in Google Scholar

Berg, C. E., & Lund, A. B. (2012). Financing public service broadcasting: A comparative perspective. Journal of Media Business Studies, 9, 7–22.10.1080/16522354.2012.11073533Search in Google Scholar

Berka, W., & Tretter, H. (2013). Public service media under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved April 3, 2018 from http://www3.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/ebu/files/Publications/Art 10 Study_final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676Search in Google Scholar

Chu, K., Lee, D.-H., & Kim, J. Y. (2016). The effect of non-stereotypical gender role advertising on consumer evaluation. International Journal of Advertising, 35, 106–134.10.1080/02650487.2015.1110942Search in Google Scholar

Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298.10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5Search in Google Scholar

EBU (2012). Empowering society: Declaration of the core values of public service media. Retrieved April 3, 2018 from http://www3.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/ebu/files/Publications/EBU-Empowering-Society_EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

European Advertising Standard Alliance (2016). Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://www.easa-alliance.org.Search in Google Scholar

European Group of Television Advertising (2016). Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://www.egta.com.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2005). Unfair commercial practices directive. 2005/29 (11 May 2005). Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32005L0029&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2010a). Audiovisual media services directive. 2010/13/EU (10 March 2010). Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010L0013&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2010b). Public service broadcasting in the digital era: The future of the dual system. 2010/2028(INI) (25 November 2010). Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2010-0286+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat (2016). Gender pay gap statistics. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics.Search in Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Babitzkow, M., & Uguccioni, S. (2000). Gender stereotyping in television advertisements: A study of French and Danish television. Genetic Social and Psychology Monographs, 126, 79–104.Search in Google Scholar

Furnham, A., & Imadzu, E. (2002). Gender portrayal in British and Japanese TV advertisements. Communications, 27, 319–348.10.1515/comm.27.3.319Search in Google Scholar

Furnham, A., & Saar, A. (2005). Gender-role stereotyping in adult and children’s television advertisements: A two-study comparison between Great Britain and Poland. Communications, 30, 73–90.10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.73Search in Google Scholar

Furnham, A., & Spencer-Bowdage, S. (2002). Sex role stereotyping in television advertisements: A content analysis of advertisements from South Africa and Great Britain. Communications, 27, 457–483.10.1515/comm.2002.003Search in Google Scholar

Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2014). Objectifying media: Their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 398–413.10.1177/0361684313515185Search in Google Scholar

Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society, 1, 175–194.10.4324/9781315679402-3Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.10.1080/19312450709336664Search in Google Scholar

Herrett-Skjellum, J., & Alien, M. (1996). Television programming and sex stereotyping: A meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 157–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.1080/23808985.1996.11678930Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1, 81–99.10.1007/BF01733682Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Horizont (2016). Marktanteile 2015: ORF stabil. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://www.horizont.at/home/news/detail/marktanteile-2015-orf-stabil.html.Search in Google Scholar

Humbert, A. L., Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, V., Oetke, N. S., & Paats, M. (2015). Gender Equality Index 2015. Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012. European Institute for Gender Equality. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/mh0415169enn.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Ibroscheva, E. (2007). Caught between east and west? Portrayals of gender in Bulgarian television advertisements. Sex Roles, 57, 409–418.10.1007/s11199-007-9261-xSearch in Google Scholar

Iosifidis, P. (2011). Growing pains? The transition to digital television in Europe. European Journal of Communication, 26, 3–17.10.1177/0267323110394562Search in Google Scholar

Knoll, S., Eisend, M., & Steinhagen, J. (2011). Gender roles in advertising: Measuring and comparing gender stereotyping on public and private TV channels in Germany. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 867–888.10.2501/IJA-30-5-867-888Search in Google Scholar

Krüger, U. M. (2016). Profile deutscher Fernsehprogramme – Tendenzen der Angebotsentwicklung [Profiles of German TV programs – Tendencies of the program history]. Media Perspektiven, 3, 166–185.Search in Google Scholar

Matthes, J., Prieler, M., & Adam, K. (2016). Gender-role portrayals in television advertising across the globe. Sex Roles, 75, 314–327.10.1007/s11199-016-0617-ySearch in Google Scholar

Mediaresearch ORF (2016). Technischer Empfang / Haushaltsausstattung. Retrieved November 25, 2015 form http://medienforschung.orf.at/.Search in Google Scholar

Mediaresearch ORF (2018). Fernsehnutzung in Österreich. Retrieved April 3, 2018 from http://medienforschung.orf.at/.Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. Communication Yearbook, 20, 1–45.10.1080/23808985.1997.11678937Search in Google Scholar

Nassif, A., & Gunter, B. (2008). Gender representation in television advertisements in Britain and Saudi Arabia. Sex Roles, 58, 752–760.10.1007/s11199-008-9394-6Search in Google Scholar

Neto, F., & Pinto, I. (1998). Gender stereotypes in Portuguese television advertisements. Sex Roles, 39, 153–164.10.1023/A:1018890118950Search in Google Scholar

Oppliger, P. A. (2007). Effects of gender stereotyping on socialization. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 199–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

ORF-G (2010). Federal Act on the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Erv/ERV_1984_379/ERV_1984_379.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Paek, H.-J., Nelson, M. R., & Vilela, A. M. (2011). Examination of gender-role portrayals in television advertising across seven countries. Sex Roles, 64, 192–207.10.1007/s11199-010-9850-ySearch in Google Scholar

Parlament (2016). Frauenanteil im Nationalrat. Retrieved November 25, 2016 from https://www.parlament.gv.at/SERV/STAT/PERSSTAT/FRAUENANTEIL/frauenanteil_NR.shtml.Search in Google Scholar

Prieler, M. (2016). Gender stereotypes in Spanish- and English-language television advertisements in the United States. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 275–300.10.1080/15205436.2015.1111386Search in Google Scholar

Putrevu, S. (2008). Consumer responses toward sexual and nonsexual appeals: The influence of involvement, need for cognition (NFC), and gender. Journal of Advertising, 37, 57–70.10.2753/JOA0091-3367370205Search in Google Scholar

Rollero, C. (2013). Men and women facing objectification: The effects of media models on well-being, self-esteem and ambivalent sexism. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 373–382.10.1174/021347413807719166Search in Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493–517.10.1006/jesp.1995.1022Search in Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, J. M., & Rosselli, F. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Sex Roles, 58, 579–589.10.1007/s11199-007-9359-1Search in Google Scholar

Trekels, J., Karsay, K., Eggermont, S., & Vandenbosch, L. (2018). How social and mass media relate to youth’s self-sexualization: Taking a cross-national perspective on rewarded appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1440–1455.10.1007/s10964-018-0844-3Search in Google Scholar

Verhellen, Y., Dens, N., & de Pelsmacker, P. (2014). A longitudinal content analysis of gender role portrayal in Belgian television advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22, 170–188.10.1080/13527266.2013.871321Search in Google Scholar

Walton, G., & Potvin, L. (2009). Boobs, boxing, and bombs: Problematizing the entertainment of Spike TV. Spaces for Difference. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 2–14.Search in Google Scholar

Woelke, J. (2012). Fernsehen in Österreich. Programmspartenstrukturen und Themenschwerpunkte des fernsehpublizistischen Angebots von ORF eins, ORF 2, ATV, Puls 4 und Servus T im Frühjahr 2011 [TV in Austria. Program structures and thematic focus of the programs of ORF one, ORF 2, ATV, Puls 5 and Servus T in spring 2011]. In C. Steininger & J. Woelke (Eds.), Fernsehen in Österreich 2011/2012 (pp. 13–46). Konstanz: UVK.Search in Google Scholar

Zotos, Y. C., & Tsichla, E. (2014). Female stereotypes in print advertising: A retrospective analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 446–454.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.064Search in Google Scholar

Zubayr, C., & Gerhard, H. (2016). Tendenzen im Zuschauerverhalten [Tendencies in the audience behavior]. Media Perspektiven, 3, 142–155.Search in Google Scholar

Appendix

Variables and coding applied.

Variable

Codes

Short description

Gender of primary character

1 = Man

2 = Women

All conditions must apply to assess the primary character: 1) the primary character appears for at least three seconds (with a speaking part or in an important take); 2) the primary character must be clearly visible in order to identify age and gender; 3) the primary character must (appear to) be older than 18 years and must not be a child; 4) only humans can be primary characters; 5) there is only one primary character per advertisement.

Voiceover

0 = None

1 = Male

2 = Female

3 = Both

A voiceover is defined as an audio message from a narrator that is not seen in the advertisement.

Product category

Body products and cleaning

1 = yes / 0 = no

Technological products and cars

1 = yes / 0 = no

Product category refers to the advertised product, not the advertised brand or company.

Body products and cleaning: Body care / toiletries / cosmetics / beauty products; cleaning products; kitchenware.

Technological products and cars: Home entertainment; mobile phones / providers; computer / information / communications; automotive / vehicles / transportation / accessories.

Dominant setting

1 = Workplace

2 = Home setting

3 = Other indoor setting (not home)

4 = Outdoors

5 = In motion/transport (car, bus, etc.)

6 = Virtual space

7 = Other

The dominant setting is defined as the location where the character is shown. If several locations appear in the advertisement, the most prominent location will be coded. The location will be based on the character’s perspective: a waiter in a restaurant = workplace; guest sitting in the restaurant (= other indoor setting).

Age

1 = 18–34 years

2 = 35–49 years

3 = 50 years or older

Based on following criteria, the age of the primary character is estimated: 1) age of the character is publicly known (e. g., primary character is a celebrity); 2) the content of the advertisement points toward the age of the character; 3) the character’s physical appearance indicates the age (e. g., grey/sparse hair, wrinkles).

Clothing

1 = Fully dressed

2 = Partially dressed

3 = Mostly undressed

4 = Naked

If the primary character is shown with different clothes, the clothing with the highest degree of nudity will be coded.

Fully dressed: clothing that covers shoulders, thighs, and knees.

Suggestively dressed: clothing that reveals knees, upper thighs, shoulders, or cleavage.

Mostly undressed: underwear, swimwear.

Naked: undressed, naked; also includes suggested nudity (e. g., only wearing a towel, covered in bed sheets).

Note: The full codebook including all coding criteria may be obtained from the authors.

Published Online: 2019-04-12
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2019-2055/html
Scroll Up Arrow