Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 27, 2019

Sensitizing the concept of mediatization for the study of social movements

  • Mojca Pajnik EMAIL logo , Marko Ribać and Peter Sekloča
From the journal Communications

Abstract

We suggest the “sensitizing concept of mediatization” as an analytical tool to analyze public communication of social movements in times of social, economic and political crisis, and we apply the tool to explore the case of the Slovenian uprisings of 2012–13. First, theoretically, we couple Tilly’s understanding of social movements’ practices with Hjarvard’s distinction between “direct” and “indirect” forms of mediatization. Second, in the empirical part, we categorize and classify movement organizations, activist initiatives and political groups into two distinct groups and observe how they respond to the media logic of newsworthiness and the political logic of office-seeking during the contentious actions of mass mobilization. We observe asymmetrical responses to processes of mediatization, which vary according to organizational structure, practices and movements’ vision of social transformation. The article shows how different protest groups respond to the three media logic techniques: a) personalization of political actors, b) decontextualization and simplification of transformative potential that are inherent to protest cycles, and how the two mobilized groups interact with the journalistic focus on c) spectacle and images of violence. We argue that the more the specific movement/group expresses criticism over the interplay of the media and the political logic, marked by the three discursive modes mentioned, the less it adopts the dominant media logic and the more it seeks for alternative and innovative media action.

References

Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media logic, social control and fear. Communication Theory, 23, 223–238. doi:10.1111/comt.1201710.1111/comt.12017Search in Google Scholar

Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc088Search in Google Scholar

Asp, K. (1990). Medialization, media logic, and mediarchy. Nordicom Review, 11(2), 47–50.Search in Google Scholar

Atton, C. (Ed.) (2015). The Routledge companion to alternative and community media. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315717241Search in Google Scholar

Blumler, J. G. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.10.2307/2088165Search in Google Scholar

Blumler, J. G. (2014). Mediatization and democracy. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics (pp. 31–41). London: Palgrave Macmillian.10.1057/9781137275844_2Search in Google Scholar

della Porta, D. (2009). Consensus in movements. In D. della Porta (Ed.), Democracy in social movements (pp. 73–99). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230240865_4Search in Google Scholar

della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity: Bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

della Porta, D., & Diani M. (2006). Social movements. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Diani, M. (1992). The Concept of Social Movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.xSearch in Google Scholar

Elmelund-Præstekær, C., Hopmann, D. N., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2011). Does mediatization change MP–media interaction and MP attitudes toward the media? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Danish MPs. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(3), 382–403. doi:10.1177/194016121140073510.1177/1940161211400735Search in Google Scholar

Fenton, N., & Downey, J. (2003). Counter public spheres and global modernity. Javnost The Public, 10(1), 15–32.10.1080/13183222.2003.11008819Search in Google Scholar

Guardiancich, I. (2016). Slovenia: The end of a success story? When a partial reform equilibrium turns bad. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(2), 205–231.10.1080/09668136.2015.1126805Search in Google Scholar

Hepp, A. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediatization of everything’. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 615–629. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026732311350114810.1177/0267323113501148Search in Google Scholar

Hjarvard, S. (2004). From bricks to bytes: The mediatization of a global toy industry. In I. Bondebjerg & P. Golding (Eds.), European culture and the media (pp. 43–63). Bristol: Intellect Books.10.2307/j.ctv36xw5qn.6Search in Google Scholar

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.10.1515/nor-2017-0181Search in Google Scholar

Hjarvard, S. (2014). Mediatization and cultural and social change: An institutional perspective. In P. J. Schulz & P. Cobley (Eds.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 199–225). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110272215.199Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definite and sensitizing conceptualization of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203–222. doi:10.1111/comt.1201410.1111/comt.12014Search in Google Scholar

Kirn, G. (2014). Slovenia’s social uprising in the European crisis: Maribor as periphery from 1988 to 2012. Stasis, 2(1), 106–129.Search in Google Scholar

Kirn, G. (2019). Maribor’s social uprising in the European crisis: From anti-politics of people to politicisation of periphery’s surplus population? In F. Bieber & D. Brentin (Eds.), Social movements in the Balkans: Rebellion and protest from Maribor to Taksim (pp. 30–47). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kržan, M. (2014). Crisis in Slovenia: Roots, effects, prospects. Metu Studies in Development, 41(3), 323–348.Search in Google Scholar

Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the logics: A conceptual framework for the mediatization of politics. Communication Theory, 23(3), 239–258. doi:10.1111/comt.1201310.1111/comt.12013Search in Google Scholar

Leon-Guerrero, A. (2005). Social problems. Community, policy, and social action. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Macdonald, M. (1998). Personalisation in current affairs journalism. Javnost The Public, 5(3), 109–126.10.1080/13183222.1998.11008686Search in Google Scholar

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2004). The logic of appropriateness, ARENA Working Papers no. 04/09. Oslo: ARENA, Centre for European Studies. Retrieved February 12, 2013 from http://sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers2004/wp04_9.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Marcinkowski, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Reflections on the state of the concept. Javnost The Public, 21(2), 5–22.10.1080/13183222.2014.11009142Search in Google Scholar

Martin, G. (2015). Understanding social movements. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203837092Search in Google Scholar

Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediatization processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), 252–271. doi:10.1111/comt.1203810.1111/comt.12038Search in Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, G. (1987). Media logic and party logic in campaign coverage: The Italian general election of 1983. European Journal of Communication, 2(1), 81–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026732318700200100510.1177/0267323187002001005Search in Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). ‘Mediatization’ of politics: A challenge for democracy. Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261. doi:10.1080/10584609919861310.1080/105846099198613Search in Google Scholar

Preston, P. (Ed.) (2014). In the eye of the storm. Javnost – The Public, XXI(4).Search in Google Scholar

Sadiki, L. (Ed.) (2015). Routledge handbook of the Arab Spring: Rethinking democratization. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315763026Search in Google Scholar

Sitrin, M., & Azzellini, D. (2014). They can’t represent us!: Reinventing democracy from Greece to Occupy. London, New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. doi:10.1177/194016120831909710.1177/1940161208319097Search in Google Scholar

Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2009). Shaping politics: Mediatization and media interventionism. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: Concepts, changes, consequences (pp. 205–223). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2009). Social movements, 1768–2008. Boulder, London: Paradigm Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Vobič, I., Slaček Brlek, A. S., Mance, B., & Amon Prodnik, J. (2014). Changing faces of Slovenia. Political, socio-economic and news media aspects of the crisis. Javnost The Public, 21(4), 77–98.10.1080/13183222.2014.11077104Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-09-27
Published in Print: 2020-11-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.11.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2019-2064/html
Scroll to top button