Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 19, 2019

The democratic quality of political depictions in fictional TV entertainment. A comparative content analysis of the political drama Borgen and the journalistic magazine Berlin direkt

Cordula Nitsch, Olaf Jandura and Peter Bienhaus
From the journal Communications

Abstract

The quality of political reporting in the news media is a focal point of communication research. Politics, however, is not only conveyed via traditional sources of information, but via fictional sources. In particular, political dramas (e. g., The West Wing, Borgen) enjoy great popularity and are often acknowledged for their realistic depiction of politics. Still, little is known about the democratic quality of such fictional depictions. This paper aims to fill the gap by contrasting the depiction of politics in the fictional TV series Borgen with political reporting in a traditional TV magazine (Berlin direkt). The comparative content analysis is based on ten issues that are covered in both formats and focuses on the quality criteria of relevance, pluralism, and democratic discourse norms. Findings show no significant differences between Borgen and Berlin direkt for any of the three criteria, clearly indicating that fictional TV series can offer the same content quality as political reporting.

References

Althaus, S. D. (2012). What’s good and bad in political communication research? Normative standards for evaluating media and citizen performance. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 97–112). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE.10.4135/9781446201015.n9Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, S. (2003). The West Wing as a pedagogical tool: Using drama to examine American politics and media perceptions of our political system. In P. C. Rollins & J. E. O’Connor (Eds.), The West Wing: The American presidency as television drama (pp. 175–186). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, P. R., & Cao, X. (2008). Late-night comedy television shows as news sources: What the polls say. In J. S. Morris and J. C. Baumgartner (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age (pp. 263–279). London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, T., & Haas P. J. (2005). Projecting politics. Political messages in American films. Armonk, London: M. E. Sharpe.Search in Google Scholar

Corner, J., & Richardson, K. (2007). Political culture and television fiction: The Amazing Mrs Pritchard. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(4), 387–403.10.1177/1367549408094979Search in Google Scholar

Damgaard, E. (2003). Denmark: The life and death of government coalitions. In W. C. Müller and K. Strøm (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 231–263). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eilders, C., & Nitsch, C. (2015). Politics in fictional entertainment: An empirical classification of movies and TV series. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1563–1587.Search in Google Scholar

Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324.10.1023/A:1016284431021Search in Google Scholar

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream. Television’s contributions to political orientations. Journal of Communication, 32(2), 100–127.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb00500.xSearch in Google Scholar

Glasser, T. L. (2009). The principals and practice of democracy. In C. Christians, T. L. Glasser, D. McQuail, K. Nordenstreng, & R. A. White (Eds), Normative theories of the media (pp. 91–113). Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790867.003Search in Google Scholar

Hamburger, E. I. (2000). Politics and intimacy: The agrarian reform in a Brazilian telenovela. Television & New Media, 1(2), 159–178.10.1177/152747640000100203Search in Google Scholar

Hochscherf, T., & Philipsen, H. (2013). Speaking for and to the nation? Borgen and the cultural viability of public service broadcasting in Denmark and Germany. Journal of Popular Television, 1(2), 243–250.10.1386/jptv.1.2.243_1Search in Google Scholar

Holbert, R. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 436–453.10.1177/0002764205279419Search in Google Scholar

Holbert, R. L., Pillion, O., Tschida, D. A., Armfield, G. G., Kinder, K., Cherry, K. L., & Daulton, A. R. (2003). The West Wing as endorsement of the U.S. presidency: Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 427–443.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02600.xSearch in Google Scholar

Holbert, R. L., Tschida, D. A., Dixon, M., Cherry, K., Steuber, K., & Airne, D. (2005). The West Wing and depictions of the American presidency: Expanding the domains of framing in political communication. Communication Quarterly, 53(4), 505–522.10.1080/01463370500102228Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the „not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. The American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–858.10.4324/9780203505984-7Search in Google Scholar

Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, democracy. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jandura, O., & Friedrich, K. (2014). Quality of political media coverage. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Handbook of communication science: Political communication (pp. 351–373). Berlin: De Gryter Mouton.10.1515/9783110238174.351Search in Google Scholar

Kappert, I. (2013). Immer schön unberechenbar bleiben [Stay always unpredictable]. Taz. Die Tageszeitung. Retrieved October 18, 2019 from http://taz.de/Essay-neue-TV-Serien/!125342/.Search in Google Scholar

Kepplinger, H. M. (1995). Medienzugang, Medienmonopol, Medienkonzentration. Lässt sich mit rechtlichen Mitteln Meinungs- und Programmvielfalt sichern? Stellungnahme aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht [Media access, media monopoly, media concentration. Can legal measures secure pluralism of opinions and programs? An academic perspective]. In Bitburger Gespräche. Jahrbuch 1995/II (pp. 45–82). München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2013). Politische Kommunikation zwischen Information und Unterhaltung: eine Analysematrix [Political communication between information and entertainment: a matrix of analysis]. In N. Gonser (Ed.), Die multimediale Zukunft des Qualitätsjournalismus – Wer gewinnt durch Public Value? (pp. 35–51). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-01644-9_3Search in Google Scholar

Lau, M., & Pham, K. (2014). Wahre Machtspiele. Wie Politik Fernsehserien beleben kann und wie Fernsehserien in die Politik hineinregieren. Ein Gespräch mit dem Grünen Jürgen Trittin und dem Borgen-Produzenten Ingolf Gabold [Real power games. How politics can enliven television series and how television series can govern politics. A conversation with the Green Jürgen Trittin and Borgen producer Ingolf Gabold]. DIE ZEIT, 30.10.2014. Retrieved October 18, 2019 from https://www.zeit.de/2014/45/borgen-tv-serie-juergen-trittin-ingolf-gabold.Search in Google Scholar

Lichter, S. R., Lichter, L. S., & Amundson, D. (2000). Government goes down the tube: Images of government in TV entertainment, 1955–1998. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(2), 96–103.10.1177/1081180X00005002007Search in Google Scholar

Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate (pp. 9–35). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Marschall, S. (2013). Parlamentarische Kommunikation in der repräsentativen Demokratie der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer „kommunikativen Reparlamentarisierung“ [Parliamentary communication in the representative democracy of Germany. On the possibilities of a “communicative reparliamentarization”]. In E. Czerwick (Ed.), Politische Kommunikation in der repräsentativen Demokratie der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Festschrift für Ulrich Sarcinelli (pp. 195–206). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Search in Google Scholar

McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.10.1086/267990Search in Google Scholar

McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Mutz, D. C., & Nir, L. (2010). Not necessarily the news: Does fictional television influence real-world policy preferences? Mass Communication and Society, 13, 196–217.10.1080/15205430902813856Search in Google Scholar

Nitsch, C., & Eilders, C. (2015). Fictional politics on TV: Comparing the representations of political reality in the U.S. series ‘The West Wing’ and the German series ‘Kanzleramt’. Global Media Journal. German Edition, 5(1), 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Pfau, M., Moy, P., & Szabo, E. A. (2001). Influence of prime-time television programming on perceptions of the federal government. Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 437–453.10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_7Search in Google Scholar

Pompper, D. (2003). ‘The West Wing’: White House narratives that journalism cannot tell. In P. C. Rollins & J. E. O’Connor (Eds.), The West Wing: The American presidency as television drama (pp. 17–31). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death. Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Redvall, E. N. (2013). “Dogmas” for television drama: The ideas of “one vision”, “double storytelling”, “crossover” and “producer’s choice” in drama series from the Danish public service broadcaster DR. Journal of Popular Television, 1(2), 227–234.10.1386/jptv.1.2.227_1Search in Google Scholar

Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., & Legnante, G. (2011). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 221–239.10.1177/1464884911427803Search in Google Scholar

Riegert, K. (2007). The ideology of ‘The West Wing’: The television show that wants to be real. In K. Riegert (Ed.), Politicotainment. Television’s take on the real (pp. 213–236). New York: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Rosengren, K. E., Carlsson, M., & Tågerud, Y. (1996). Quality in programming: Views from the north. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 3–48). Luton: John Libby Media.Search in Google Scholar

Saalfeld, T. (2003). Germany: Stable Parties, chancellor democracy, and the art of informal settlement. In W. C. Müller & K. Strøm (eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 32–85). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schönbach, K. (1977). Trennung von Nachricht und Meinung. Empirische Untersuchung eines journalistischen Qualitätskriteriums [Separating news and opinion. Empirical analysis of a journalistic quality criterion]. Freiburg, München: Karl Alber.Search in Google Scholar

Schwer, K., & Brosius, H.-B. (2008). Sphären des (Un-) Politischen. Ein Modell zur Analyse von Politikdarstellung und -rezeption [Spheres of the (un-)political. A model for the analysis of the depiction and reception of politics]. In H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, R. Blum & O. Jarren (Eds.), Seismographische Funktion von Öffentlichkeit im Wandel (pp. 191–209). Wiesbaden: VS.10.1007/978-3-531-91126-7_10Search in Google Scholar

Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6, 331–345.10.1080/14616700500131950Search in Google Scholar

Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170.10.1086/267786Search in Google Scholar

van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., …, & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment. A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27.10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551Search in Google Scholar

van Zoonen, L., & Wring, D. (2012). Trends in political television fiction in the UK: Themes, characters and narratives, 1965–2009. Media, Culture and Society, 34(3), 263–279.10.1177/0163443711433663Search in Google Scholar

Wessler, H., & Rinke, E. M. (2014). Deliberative performance of television news in three types of democracy: Insights from the U.S., Germany, and Russia. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 827–851.10.31235/osf.io/3awgfSearch in Google Scholar

Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511846366Search in Google Scholar

Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20, 109–130.10.1080/10584600390211136Search in Google Scholar

Zubayr, C., & Gerhard, H. (2015). Tendenzen im Zuschauerverhalten. Fernsehgewohnheiten und Fernsehreichweiten im Jahr 2014 [Tendencies in audience behavior. TV habits and reach in 2014]. Media Perspektiven, 3, 110–125.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-19
Published in Print: 2021-03-08

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston