Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 10, 2022

Protesters at the news gates: An experimental study of journalists’ news judgment of protest events

  • Camilo Cristancho and Ruud Wouters
From the journal Communications

Abstract

Media attention is a key political resource for protesters. This implies that journalists are a crucial audience to which protesters seek to appeal. We study to what extent features of protest, of journalists, and of news organizations affect journalists’ news judgment. We exposed 78 Spanish journalists to vignettes of asylum seeker protests. Four features were systematically manipulated: protesters’ worthiness, unity, numbers, and commitment (WUNC). The experiments scrutinize the extent to which journalists consider a protest newsworthy (presence) and the likelihood that a protest is featured on a newspaper’s front page (prominence). Our results show that in terms of media presence, high turnout is key. Highly unified protesters, in contrast, are considered less newsworthy. Regarding prominence, strongly committed demonstrators more easily make it to the frontpage. Individual characteristics of journalists have no direct effect on news judgment. Journalists’ editorial status and ideological (outlet) placement only moderate the effect of some of the protest features, although in terms of front-page placement a more potent adversary versus ally effect is distinguished.

References

Allern, S. (2017). Journalistic and commercial news values. Nordicom Review, 23(1–2), 137–152.10.1515/nor-2017-0327Search in Google Scholar

Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., & Su, Y. (2010). The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 287–307.10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029Search in Google Scholar

Amenta, E., Elliott, T. A., Shortt, N., Tierney, A. C., Türkoğlu, D., & Vann Jr, B. (2017). From bias to coverage: What explains how news organizations treat social movements. Sociology Compass, 11(3), e12460.10.1111/soc4.12460Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866.10.1177/0003122410386689Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, K. T., & Gaby, S. (2015). Local protest and federal policy: The impact of the civil rights movement on the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Sociological Forum (Vol. 30, pp. 509–527).10.1111/socf.12175Search in Google Scholar

Barranco, J., & Wisler, D. (1999). Validity and systematicity of newspaper data in event analysis. European Sociological Review, 15(3), 301–322.10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018265Search in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R., & Chaqués Bonafont, L. (2015). All news is bad news: Newspaper coverage of political parties in Spain. Political Communication, 32(2), 268–291.10.1080/10584609.2014.919974Search in Google Scholar

Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(1), 38–57.10.1086/268900Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139198752Search in Google Scholar

Boukes, M., Jones, N. P., & Vliegenthart, R. (2020). Newsworthiness and story prominence: How the presence of news factors relates to upfront position and length of news stories. Journalism. doi:146488491989931310.1177/1464884919899313Search in Google Scholar

Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2020). A general pattern in the construction of economic newsworthiness? Analyzing news factors in popular, quality, regional, and financial newspapers. Journalism, 21(2), 279–300.10.1177/1464884917725989Search in Google Scholar

Boydstun, A. E. (2013). Making the news: Politics, the media, and agenda setting: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226065601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, M. P., McCluskey, M. R., Devanathan, N., Stein, S. E., & McLeod, D. (2004). The influence of level of deviance and protest type on coverage of social protest in Wisconsin from 1960 to 1999. Mass Communication & Society, 7(1), 43–60.10.1207/s15327825mcs0701_4Search in Google Scholar

Breed, W. (1955). Newspaper ‘opinion leaders’ and processes of standardization. Journalism Quarterly, 32(3), 277–328.10.1177/107769905503200302Search in Google Scholar

Cottle, S. (2007). Ethnography and news production: New(s) developments in the field. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 1–16.10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00002.xSearch in Google Scholar

Donsbach, W. (2004). Psychology of news decisions. Factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism, 5(2), 131–157.10.1177/146488490452002Search in Google Scholar

Downton Jr, J., & Wehr, P. (1998). Persistent pacifism: How activist commitment is developed and sustained. Journal of Peace Research, 35(5), 531–550.10.1177/0022343398035005001Search in Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (2011). Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921452Search in Google Scholar

Eilders, C. (2006). News factors and news decisions. Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany. Communications, 31(1), 5–24.10.1515/COMMUN.2006.002Search in Google Scholar

Fassiotto, M., & Soule, S. A. (2017). Loud and clear: The effect of protest signals on congressional attention. Mobilization, 22(1), 17–38.10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-17Search in Google Scholar

Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2017). Extreme protest tactics reduce popular support for social movements. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.10.2139/ssrn.2911177Search in Google Scholar

Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613685Search in Google Scholar

Fico, F., & Freedman, E. (2001). Setting the news story agenda: Candidates and commentators in news coverage of a governor’s race. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 437–449.10.1177/107769900107800303Search in Google Scholar

Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990–1011.10.1177/1461444816676646Search in Google Scholar

Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90.10.1177/002234336500200104Search in Google Scholar

Gamson, W. (2004). Bystanders, public opinion and the media. In D. Snow, S. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movement studies (pp. 242–262). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470999103.ch11Search in Google Scholar

Gamson, W., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.10.1177/0002716293528001009Search in Google Scholar

Garcés-Mascareñas, B., & Pasetti, F. (2019). ¿ A más solicitudes de asilo igual recepción? El sistema estatal de acogida en España desde 2015. Anuario CIDOB de la Inmigración, 114–126.10.24241/AnuarioCIDOBInmi.2019.114Search in Google Scholar

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge university press.10.1017/CBO9780511790867Search in Google Scholar

Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280.10.1080/14616700118449Search in Google Scholar

Harcup, T., & O’neill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism studies, 18(12), 1470–1488.10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193Search in Google Scholar

Helfer, L., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). What makes party messages fit for reporting? An experimental study of journalistic news selection. Political Communication, 33(1), 59–77.10.1080/10584609.2014.969464Search in Google Scholar

Hocke, P. (1998). Determining the selection bias in local and national newspaper reports on protest events. In D. Rucht, R. Koopmans & F. Neidhardt (Eds.), Acts of Dissent. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

IWMF (2011). Global report on the status of women in the news media. Washington: International Women’s Media Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Jost, P., & Koehler, C. (2018). Who shapes the news? Analyzing journalists’ and organizational interests as competing influences on biased coverage. Journalism, 22(2), 484–500. doi:1464884918788270.10.1177/1464884918788270Search in Google Scholar

Joye, S., Heinrich, A., & Wöhlert, R. (2016). 50 years of Galtung and Ruge: Reflections on their model of news values and its relevance for the study of journalism and communication today. CM. Communication and Media, 11(36), 5–28.10.5937/comman11-9514Search in Google Scholar

Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H.-B., & Staab, J. F. (1991). Instrumental actualization: A theory of mediated conflicts. European Journal of Communication, 6(3), 263–290.10.1177/0267323191006003002Search in Google Scholar

Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3–4), 367–391.10.1023/B:RYSO.0000038603.34963.deSearch in Google Scholar

Laschever, E. (2017). Are they not worthy? How partisan political blogs legitimize the Tea Party Movement and Occupy Wall Street. Paper presented at the Sociological Forum.10.1111/socf.12334Search in Google Scholar

Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. The American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1144–1158.10.2307/1953909Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J., McPhail, C., & Smith, J. (1996). Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 478–499.10.2307/2096360Search in Google Scholar

McLeod, D., & Hertog, J. (1998). Social control, social change and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups. In D. Demers & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change: A macrosocial perspective (pp. 305–330). Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, P., & Maney, G. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505.10.1086/316964Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, T. E., & Donsbach, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13(4), 455–468.10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131Search in Google Scholar

Puglisi, R., & Snyder Jr, J. M. (2015). Empirical studies of media bias. In Handbook of media economics (Vol. 1, pp. 647–667). North-Holland.10.1016/B978-0-444-63685-0.00015-2Search in Google Scholar

Rafail, P., & McCarthy, J. D. (2018). Making the Tea Party Republican: Media bias and framing in newspapers and cable news. Social Currents, 5(5), 421–437. doi:2329496518759129.10.1177/2329496518759129Search in Google Scholar

Rafail, P., Walker, E. T., & McCarthy, J. D. (2015). Protests on the front page media salience, institutional dynamics, and coverage of collective action in the New York Times, 1960–1995. Communication Research, 46(1), 33–61. doi:009365021560823910.1177/0093650215608239Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message. Theories of influence on mass media content. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.10.4324/9780203930434Search in Google Scholar

Shultziner, D., & Shoshan, A. (2018). A journalists’ protest? Personal identification and journalistic activism in the Israel social justice protest movement. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 44–69.10.1177/1940161217736889Search in Google Scholar

Shultziner, D., & Stukalin, Y. (2019). Distorting the news? The mechanisms of partisan media bias and its effects on news production. Political Behavior, 1–22. online before print.10.1007/s11109-019-09551-ySearch in Google Scholar

Skovsgaard, M. (2014). A tabloid mind? Professional values and organizational pressures as explanations of tabloid journalism. Media, Culture and Society, 36(2), 200–218.10.1177/0163443713515740Search in Google Scholar

Smidt, C. D. (2012). Not all the news is the same. Protests, presidents, and the mass public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 72–94.10.1093/poq/nfr019Search in Google Scholar

Staab, J. F. (1990). The role of news factors in news selection: A theoretical reconsideration. European Journal of Communication, 5(4), 423–443.10.1177/0267323190005004003Search in Google Scholar

Strömbäck, J., Karlsson, M., & Hopmann, D. N. (2012). Determinants of news content: Comparing journalists’ perceptions of the normative and actual impact of different event properties when deciding what’s news. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 718–728.10.1080/1461670X.2012.664321Search in Google Scholar

Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 253–270). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768–2004. London: Paradigm Publishers.10.4324/9781315632063Search in Google Scholar

Tilly, C. (2006). WUNC. In J. T. Schnapp & M. Tiews (Eds.), Crowds. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tresh, A. (2009). Politicians in the media: Determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in Swiss newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 67–90.10.1177/1940161208323266Search in Google Scholar

Valentim, V., & Baumgarten, B. (2019). Media coverage beyond visibility: the case of the portuguese anti-austerity protests. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24(1), 39–58.10.17813/1086-671X-24-1-39Search in Google Scholar

Van Dalen, A. (2012). The algorithms behind the headlines: How machine-written news redefines the core skills of human journalists. Journalism practice, 6(5–6), 648–658.10.1080/17512786.2012.667268Search in Google Scholar

Van der Brug, W., D’Amato, G., Berkhout, J., & Ruedin, D. (2015). A framework for studying the politicisation of immigration (pp. 17–34). Routledge.10.4324/9781315723303-8Search in Google Scholar

Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Jennings, W., Hutter, S., Grossman, E., Guigni, M., …, Gava, R. (2016). The media as a dual mediator of the political agenda setting effect of protest: A longitudinal study in six west-European countries. Social Forces, 1–54. doi:10.1093/sf/sow07510.1093/sf/sow075Search in Google Scholar

Vos, D. (2013). The vertical glass ceiling: Explaining female politicians’ underrepresentation in television news. De Gruyter.10.1515/commun-2013-0023Search in Google Scholar

Vos, D. (2016). How ordinary MPs can make it into the news: A factorial survey experiment with political journalists to explain the newsworthiness of MPs. Mass Communication and Society, 19(6), 738–757.10.1080/15205436.2016.1185128Search in Google Scholar

Vos, T., & Heinderyckx, F. (Eds.). (2015). Gatekeeping in transition. Routledge.10.4324/9781315849652Search in Google Scholar

Weaver, D., & Scacco, J. (2012). Revisiting the protest paradigm: The Tea Party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 61–84.10.1177/1940161212462872Search in Google Scholar

Weaver, D. A., & Scacco, J. M. (2013). Revisiting the protest paradigm: The Tea Party as filtered through prime-time cable news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 61–84.10.1177/1940161212462872Search in Google Scholar

White, D. M. (1950). The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism quarterly, 27(4), 383–390.10.4324/9781315189772-8Search in Google Scholar

Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Promoting peace through the news media: Some initial lessons from the Oslo peace process. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2(4), 52–70.10.1177/1081180X97002004005Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R. (2013). From the street to the screen: Characteristics of protest events as determinants of television news coverage. Mobilization, 18(1), 83–104.10.17813/maiq.18.1.y6067731j4844067Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R. (2019). The persuasive power of protest. How protest wins public support. Social Forces, 98(1), 403–426.10.1093/sf/soy110Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R., & Van Camp, K. (2017). Less than expected? How media cover demonstration turnout. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(4), 450–470.10.1177/1940161217720773Search in Google Scholar

Wouters, R., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Demonstrating power: How protest persuades political representatives. American Sociological Review, 82(2), 361–383.10.1177/0003122417690325Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-10
Published in Print: 2022-06-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2020-0023/html
Scroll to top button