Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 18, 2014

Inter-Communicative Decentralized Multi-Scale Control (ICD-MSC) Scheme: A New Approach to Overcome MIMO Process Interactions

Jobrun Nandong and Zhuquan Zang


Decentralized PID control has been extensively used in process industry due to its functional simplicity. But designing an effective decentralized PID control system is very challenging because of process interactions and dead times, which often impose limitations on control performance. In practice, to alleviate the detrimental effect of process interactions on control performance, decoupling controllers are often incorporated into a decentralized control scheme. In many cases, these conventional decoupling controllers are not physically realizable or too complex for practical implementation. In this paper, we propose an alternative scheme to overcome the performance limitation imposed by process interactions. This new control scheme is extended from the SISO multi-scale control scheme previously developed for nonminimum-phase processes. The salient feature of the new control scheme lies in its communicative structure enabling collaborative communication among all the sub-controllers in the system. This communicative structure serves the purpose of reducing the detrimental effect of process interactions leading to improved control performance and performance robustness. Extensive numerical study shows that the new control scheme is able to outperform some existing decentralized control schemes augmented with traditional decoupling controllers.


This work is partially supported by Curtin Sarawak Research Cluster Fund under the auspices of Intelligent Systems, Design and Control (ISDC) Research Area at Curtin University, Malaysia.


1. LeeJ, ChoW, EdgarTF. Multiloop PI controller tuning for interacting multivariable processes. Comput Chem Eng1998;22:171123.10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00230-0Search in Google Scholar

2. HuangHP, JengJC, ChiangCH, PanW. A direct method for multi-loop PI/PID controller design. J Process Control2003;13:76986.10.1016/S0959-1524(03)00009-XSearch in Google Scholar

3. LuybenWL. Simple method for tuning SISO controllers in multivariable systems. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev1986;25:65460.10.1021/i200034a010Search in Google Scholar

4. ZieglerJG, NicholsNB. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME1942;64:75968.Search in Google Scholar

5. LeeJ, EdgarTF. Multiloop PI/PID control system improvement via adjusting the dominant pole or the peak amplitude ratio. Chem Eng Sci2006;61:165866.10.1016/j.ces.2005.08.044Search in Google Scholar

6. MayneDQ. The design of linear multivariable systems. Automatica1973;9:2017.10.1016/0005-1098(73)90074-5Search in Google Scholar

7. HovdM, SkogestadS. Sequential design of decentralized controllers. Automatica1994;30:16017.10.1016/0005-1098(94)90099-XSearch in Google Scholar

8. ShiuSJ, HwangSH. Sequential design method for multivariable decoupling and multiloop PID controllers. Ind Eng Chem Res1998;37:10719.10.1021/ie970352nSearch in Google Scholar

9. LohA, HungC, QuekC, VasnaniV. Auto-tuning of multi-loop proportional-integral controllers using relay feedback. Ind Eng Chem Res1993;32:11027.10.1021/ie00018a017Search in Google Scholar

10. GrosdidierP, MorariM. Interaction measures for systems under decentralized control. Automatica1986;22:30920.10.1016/0005-1098(86)90029-4Search in Google Scholar

11. VuT, LeeM. Independent design of multi-loop PI/PID controllers for interacting multivariable processes. J Process Control2010;20:92233.10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.06.012Search in Google Scholar

12. JungJ, ChoiJ, LeeJ. One-parameter method for a multiloop control system design. Ind Eng Chem Res1999;38:15808.10.1021/ie980314jSearch in Google Scholar

13. ChenD, SeborgD. Design of decentralized PI control systems based on Nyquist stability analysis. J Process Control2003;13:2739.10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00021-5Search in Google Scholar

14. LeeM, LeeK, KimC, LeeJ. Analytical design of multi-loop PID controllers for desired closed-loop responses. AIChE J2004;50:16315.10.1002/aic.10166Search in Google Scholar

15. AstromK, HagglundT. PID controllers: theory, design, and tuning, 2nd ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrument Society of America, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

16. YuC. Autotuning of PID controllers: relay feedback approach. New York: Springer, 1999.10.1007/978-1-4471-3636-1Search in Google Scholar

17. ShinskeyFG. Process control systems: application, design and adjustment, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

18. GagnonE, PomerleauA, DesbiensA. Simplified, ideal or inverted decoupling. ISA Trans1998;37:26576.10.1016/S0019-0578(98)00023-8Search in Google Scholar

19. WallerK. Decoupling in distillation. AIChE J1974;20:5924.10.1002/aic.690200321Search in Google Scholar

20. GarridoJ, VazquezF, MorillaF. Centralized multivariable control by simplified decoupling. J Process Control2012;22:104462.10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.04.008Search in Google Scholar

21. RajapandiyanC, ChidambaramM. Controller design for MIMO processes based on simple decoupled equivalent transfer functions and simplified decouplers. Ind Eng Chem Res2012;51:12398410.10.1021/ie301448cSearch in Google Scholar

22. GarridoJ, VazquezF, MorillaF. An extended approach of inverted decoupling. J Process Control2011;21:5568.10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.10.004Search in Google Scholar

23. ChenP, ZhangW. Improvement on an inverted decoupling technique for a class of stable linear multivariable processes. ISA Trans2007;46:199210.10.1016/j.isatra.2006.09.002Search in Google Scholar

24. NandongJ, ZangZ. Novel multiscale control scheme for nonminimum-phase processes. Ind Eng Chem Res2013;52:824859.10.1021/ie302839vSearch in Google Scholar

25. NandongJ, ZangZ. High-performance multi-scale control scheme for stable, integrating and unstable time-delay processes. J Process Control2013;23:133343.10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.08.007Search in Google Scholar

26. ChienIL, HuangHP, YangJC. A simple multi-loop tuning method for PID controllers with no proportional kick. Ind Eng Chem Res1999;38:145668.10.1021/ie980595vSearch in Google Scholar

27. NandongJ, SamyudiaY, TadeMO. Dynamic simulation and optimization of two-stage extractive alcoholic fermentation process: design impact on controllability. Chem Prod Process Model2006;1:19342659.10.2202/1934-2659.1019Search in Google Scholar

28. CostaAC, AtalaDI, MaugeriF, MacielR. Factorial design and simulation for the optimization and determination of control structures for an extractive alcoholic fermentation. Process Biochem2001;37:12537.10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00188-1Search in Google Scholar

29. SharmaS, RangaiahGP. Modeling and optimization of a fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives. Ind Eng Chem Res2012;51:554251.10.1021/ie202205hSearch in Google Scholar

30. NandongJ, SamyudiaY, TadeMO. Novel PCA-based technique for identification of dominant variables for partial control. Chem Prod Process Model2010;5:19342659.10.2202/1934-2659.1442Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-9-18
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter