Abstract
In this article, hydrogen adsorption from gas mixture involve nitrogen and hydrogen by palladium hollow fiber membrane investigated and two dimensional model proposed for hydrogen adsorption in this model. This model has been evaluated based on equations (momentum and mass transfer) in all three parts (shell, membrane and tube) for existing gaseous compounds with using finite element method. The results of simulation validated by experimental data of hydrogen adsorption by palladium hollow fiber membrane. Modeling predictions shows good agreement with experimental data at different operating conditions such as different gas flows, temperature, pressure and etc. the result of simulation shows hydrogen separation efficiency increases with increasing temperature and pressure and decreases with increasing inlet rate. Also with using this model better performance of hollow fiber membranes can be obtained. In fact, hollow fiber membrane can be designed at different conditions and for different rates that it can save cost of various tests.
References
1. Dunn S. Hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002;27:235–64.10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00131-8Search in Google Scholar
2. Qi R, Henson MA. Membrane system design for multicomponent gas mixtures via mixed-integer nonlinear programming. Comput Chem Eng 2000;24:2719–37.10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00625-6Search in Google Scholar
3. Krovvidi KR, Kovvali AS, Vemury S, Khan AA. Approximate solutions for gas permeators separating binary mixtures. J Membr Sci 1992;66:103–18.10.1016/0376-7388(92)87001-ESearch in Google Scholar
4. Gabelman A, Hwang S-T. Hollow fiber membrane contactors. J Membr Sci 1999;159:61–106.10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00040-XSearch in Google Scholar
5. Pan C. Gas separation by permeators with high‐flux asymmetric membranes. AIChE J 1983;29:545–52.10.1002/aic.690290405Search in Google Scholar
6. Chern RT, Koros WJ, Fedkiw PS. Simulation of a hollow-fiber gas separator: the effects of process and design variables. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 1985;24:1015–22.10.1021/i200031a020Search in Google Scholar
7. Thundyil MJ, Koros WJ. Mathematical modeling of gas separation permeators – for radial crossflow, countercurrent, and cocurrent hollow fiber membrane modules. J Membr Sci 1997;125:275–91.10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00218-9Search in Google Scholar
8. Feng X, Ivory J, Rajan VS. Air separation by integrally asymmetric hollow‐fiber membranes. AIChE J 1999;45:2142–52.10.1002/aic.690451013Search in Google Scholar
9 Wang R, Liu S, Lin T. Chung T, Chem Eng Sci 2002;57:967–76.10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00435-3Search in Google Scholar
10. Pan C. Gas separation by high‐flux, asymmetric hollow‐fiber membrane. AIChE J 1986;32:2020–7.10.1002/aic.690321212Search in Google Scholar
11. Li K, Acharya DR, Hughes R. Mathematical modelling of multicomponent membrane permeators. J Membr Sci 1990;52:205–19.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80486-XSearch in Google Scholar
12. Kovvali AS, Vemury S, Admassu W. Modeling of multicomponent countercurrent gas permeators. Ind Engineering Chem Res 1994;33:896–903.10.1021/ie00028a016Search in Google Scholar
13. Coker DT, Freeman BD, Fleming GK. Modeling multicomponent gas separation using hollow‐fiber membrane contactors. AIChE J 1998;44:1289–302.10.1002/aic.690440607Search in Google Scholar
14. Marriott J, Sørensen E, Bogle I. Com Chem Eng. 2001;25:693–700.Search in Google Scholar
15. Katoh T, Tokumura M, Yoshikawa H, Kawase Y. Dynamic simulation of multicomponent gas separation by hollow-fiber membrane module: Nonideal mixing flows in permeate and residue sides using the tanks-in-series model. Sep and Purif Technol 2011;76:362–72.10.1016/j.seppur.2010.11.006Search in Google Scholar
16. Wang W, Thomas S, Zhang X, Pan X, Yang W, Xiong G. Sep Purif Technol 2006;52:177–85.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
