Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 20, 2019

Enhanced PID Controller for Non-Minimum Phase Second Order Plus Time Delay System

Purushottam Patil and C. Sankar Rao ORCID logo

Abstract

A tuning method is developed for the stabilization of the non-minimum phase second order plus time delay systems. It is well known that the presence of positive zeros pose fundamental limitations on the achievable control performance. In the present method, the coefficients of corresponding powers of s, s2 and s3 in the numerator are equated to α, β and γ times those of the denominator of the closed-loop system. The method gives three simple linear equations to get the PID parameter. The optimal tuning parameters α, β and γ are estimated by minimizing the Integral Time weighted Absolute Error (ITAE) for servo problem using fminsearch MATLAB solver aimed at providing lower maximum sensitivity function and keeping in check with the stability. The performance under model uncertainty is also analysed considering perturbation in one model parameter at a time using Kharitonov’s theorem. The closed loop performance of the proposed method is compared with the methods reported in the literature. It is observed that the proposed method successfully stabilizes and improves the performance of the uncertain system under consideration. The simulation results of three case studies show that the proposed method provides enhanced performance for the set-point tracking and disturbance rejection with improved time domain specifications.

Appendix

A Kharitonov’s Theorem [28]

This theorem gives interval for the coefficient of the characteristic equation for which the system is stable by determining the stability of vortex polynomial obtained for the boundary range of the coefficients.

The closed loop characteristic equation is given by

(35)G(s)=1+GGc=0

The characteristic equation obtained by applying Taylor’s series expansion for time delay approximation for the interval system is stated as follows

(36)G(s)=a0+a1s+a2s2+a3s3+......+ansn

Where, ai ϵ [ail, aiu],

For i = 1,2, … n., ail is the lower limit and aiu is the upper limit,

The characteristic polynomial is said to be stable only if all four khairtonov polynomial are stable. Their stability is found by applying Routh hurwitz criterion to each equation. The khairtonov’s polynomials are gives as

(37)G1(s)=a0l+a1ls+a2us2+a3us3+......
(38)G2(s)=a0l+a1us+a2us2+a3ls3+......
(39)G3(s)=a0u+a1ls+a2ls2+a3us3+......
(40)G4(s)=a0u+a1us+a2ls2+a3ls3+......

The coefficient polynomial (36) is stable if and only if all the four vertex polynomials (37–38) are stable. Initial values of kp, a1 and a2 are fixed and perturbation in time delay L is substituted with limits (LΔL)<L<(L+ΔL) in coefficients and Kharitonov’s polynomials are obtained. These polynomial’s stability is checked with Routh–Hurwitz method. In similar procedure, stability regions for kp, a1 and a2 are obtained by varying objective parameter and keeping other parameters constant.

Nomenclature

Greek alphabets:
α

Coefficient for s3

β

Coefficient for s2

γ

Coefficient for s

τ

Process time constant

τI

Integral time constant

τD

Derivative time constant

µ

Growth rate for Monod kinetics

Abbreviations:
PID

Proportional, Integral, Derivative controller

NMP

Non-Minimum Phase

FOPTD

First Order plus Time Delay

SOPTD

Second Order plus Time Delay

USOPTD

Unstable second order plus time delay

IMC

Internal Model Control

SA

Stability Analysis

IAE

Integral of Absolute Error

ITAE

Integral of Time weighted Absolute Error

ISE

Integral of Squared Error

TV

Total Variation in manipulated variable

G

Process transfer function

GC

Controller transfer function

MS

Maximum Sensitivity function

SOPTDZ

Second Order Plus Time Delay with Zeros

References

[1] Sree RP, Chidambaram M. Control of unstable systems. New Delhi: Narosa publishing house; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Li W, Eskinat E, Luyben WL. An improved auto tune identification method. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1991;30:1530–41.10.1021/ie00055a019Search in Google Scholar

[3] Vivek S, Chidambaram M. An improved relay auto tuning of PID controllers for critically damped SOPTD systems. Chem Eng Commun. 2012;199:1437–62.10.1080/00986445.2012.668863Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kenny U, George VS. Predictive PID control of non-minimum phase systems. In: Chang C. Hang, Kok Kiong Tan, Qing-Guo Wang, editor. Advances in PID Control. Springer, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rene DO, Massimiliano V, Antonio V, Normey-Rico JE, Torrico BC. Implementation and test of a new auto tuning method for PID controllers of TITO processes. Control Eng Pract. 2017;58:171–85.10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.10.010Search in Google Scholar

[6] Diaz AM, Rodriguez-Angeles A. A PI2D feedback control type for second order systems. In: Chang C. Hang, Kok Kiong Tan, Qing-Guo Wang, editor. Advances in PID control. Springer, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Torrico BC, Cavalcante MU, Braga AP, Normey-Rico JE, Albuquerque AA. Simple tuning rules for dead-time compensation of stable, integrative, and unstable first-order dead-time processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:11646–54.10.1021/ie401395xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Torrico BC, Correia WB, Fabricio GN. Simplified dead-time compensator for multiple delay SISO systems. ISA T. 2016;60:254–61.10.1016/j.isatra.2015.10.018Search in Google Scholar

[9] Torrico BC, de Almeida FMP, Lima TA, Forte MD, Rejane CS, Fabricio GN. Tuning of a dead-time compensator focusing on industrial processes. ISA T. 2018;83:189–98.10.1016/j.isatra.2018.09.003Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sree RP, Srinivas MN, Chidambaram M. A simple method of tuning PID controllers for stable and unstable FOPTD systems. Comput Chem Eng. 2004;28:2201–18.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.04.004Search in Google Scholar

[11] Santosh Kumar DB, PadmaSree R. Tuning of IMC based PID controllers for integrating systems with time delay. ISA T. 2016;63:242–55.10.1016/j.isatra.2016.03.020Search in Google Scholar

[12] Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA. Process dynamics and control. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Skogestad S. Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J Process Contr. 2003;13:291–309.10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00062-8Search in Google Scholar

[14] Simi S, Chidambaram M. A simple method of tuning series cascade controllers for unstable systems. J Control Theory Appl. 2013;11:661–7.10.1007/s11768-013-2254-0Search in Google Scholar

[15] Sree RP, Chidambaram M. A simple method of tuning PID controllers for integrator/dead-time processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2003;27:211–15.10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00178-3Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sree RP, Chidambaram M. Simple method of tuning PI controllers for stable inverse response systems. J Indian I Sc. 2003;83:73–85.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Krishna D. Tuning of PID controllers for isothermal continuous stirred tank reactor. Elixir Chem Eng. 2012;44:7218–22.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sai VA, Sree RP. Tuning of PID controllers for first order stable/unstable time delay systems with a zero. Int J Comput Tech Appl. 2015;8:985–94.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kaya I. Two-degree-of-freedom IMC structure and controller design for integrating processes based on gain and phase-margin specifications. Control Theory and Appl. 2004;151:481–7.10.1049/ip-cta:20040658Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zhang W, Gu W, Liu T. Analytical design of two degree of freedom control scheme for open-loop unstable processes with time delay. J Process Contr. 2005;15:559–72.10.1016/j.jprocont.2004.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[21] Normey-Rico JE, Camacho EF. Simple robust dead-time compensator for first-order plus dead-time unstable processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47:4784–90.10.1021/ie0713487Search in Google Scholar

[22] Uma S, Rao AS. Enhanced modified Smith predictor for second-order non-minimum phase unstable processes. Int J Syst Sci. 2016;47:966–81.10.1080/00207721.2014.911385Search in Google Scholar

[23] Begum KG, Rao AS, Radhakrishnan TK. Enhanced IMC based PID controller design for non-minimum phase (NMP) integrating processes with time delays. ISA T. 2017;68:223–34.10.1016/j.isatra.2017.03.005Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hauksdottir A, Sigurosson S. The matching coefficients PID controller. American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2011.10.1109/ACC.2011.5990764Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kuhlmann A, Bogle ID. Controllability evaluation for non-minimum phase- processes with multiplicity. AIChE J. 2001;47:2627–32.10.1002/aic.690471126Search in Google Scholar

[26] Graichen K, Hagenmeyer V, Zeitz M. Van de vusse CSTR as a benchmark problem for nonlinear feed forward control design techniques. 6th IFAC symposium on Non-linear Control System, Stuttgart, Germany, 200410.1016/S1474-6670(17)31377-0Search in Google Scholar

[27] Krishna D, Suryanarayana K, Aparna D, Sree RP. Tuning of PID controllers for continuous stirred tank reactors. IIChE. 2012;54:157–79.10.1080/00194506.2012.766005Search in Google Scholar

[28] Varun N, Chidambaram M. Robust controller design for first order plus time delay systems using Kharitonov Theorem. Third International Conference on Advances in Control and Optimization of Dynamical Systems, Kanpur, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rao AS, Chidambaram M. Control of unstable processes with two RHP poles, a zero and time delay. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng. 2006;1:63–9.10.1002/apj.8Search in Google Scholar

[30] Rao AS, Chidambaram M. Enhanced two-degrees-of-freedom control strategy for second-order unstable processes with time delay. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45:3604–14.10.1021/ie051046+Search in Google Scholar

[31] Uma S, Chidambaram M, Rao AS. Set point weighted modified Smith predictor with PID filter controllers for non-minimum-phase (NMP) integrating processes. Chem Eng Res Des. 2010;88:592–601.10.1016/j.cherd.2009.09.008Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-10-26
Revised: 2019-02-12
Accepted: 2019-03-04
Published Online: 2019-03-20

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston