Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 25, 2020

Simulation of an Acid Gas Removal Unit Using a DGA and MDEA Blend Instead of a Single Amine

Umer Zahid ORCID logo


Most of the industrial acid gas removal (AGR) units employ chemical absorption process for the removal of acid gases from the natural gas. In this study, two gas processing plants operational in Saudi Arabia have been selected where two different amines n1amely, diglycolamine (DGA) and monoethanol amine (MDEA) are used to achieve the sweet gas purity with less than 4 ppm of H2S. This study performed a feasibility simulation of AGR unit by utilizing the amine blend (DGA+MDEA) for both plants instead of a single amine. The study used a commercial process simulator to analyze the impact of process variables such as amine circulation rate, amine strength, lean amine temperature, regenerator inlet temperature, and absorber and regenerator pressure on the process performance. The results reveal that when the MDEA (0–15 wt. %) is added to DGA, marginal energy savings can be achieved. However, significant operational energy savings can be made when the DGA (0–15 wt. %) is blended with MDEA being the main amine.


The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM).



For equilibrium reactions, Aspen HYSYS provides a built-in expression for calculating equilibrium constants:


Table 6:

Parameters of the equilibrium constant of reactions used in the simulation.

H2O + DGAH+ ⇌ DGA + H3O+1.6957−8431.650−0.005037
H2O + MDEAH+ ⇌ MDEA + H3O+−9.4165−4234.9800
2 H2O ⇌ H3O+ + OH132.8990−13445.90−22.47730
H2O + HCO3 ⇌ H3O+ + CO3−2216.0490−12431.70−35.48190
H2O + H2S ⇌ H3O+ + HS214.5820−12995.40−33.54710
H2O + HS ⇌ H3O+ + S−2−9.7420−8585.4700



2-amino-2 methyl-1-propanol






Enhanced oil recovery


Electrolyte nonrandom two liquids


High heating value


Khursaniyah Gas Plant




Methyl diethanolamine


Monoethanol amine


2-piperidiene ethanol


Peng Robinson


Statistical Associating Fluid Theory with variable range


Shedgum Gas Plant


[1] Lim W, Choi K, Moon I. Current status and perspectives of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plant design. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:3065–88.10.1021/ie302877gSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Parrish W. Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing. Mechanical Engineering. Florida, USA: CRC Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Pellegrini G, Strube R, Manfrida G. Comparative study of chemical absorbents in postcombustion CO2 capture. Energy. 2010;35:851–7.10.1016/ in Google Scholar

[4] Erfani A, Boroojerdi S, Dehghani A. Simulation of an operational amine based CO2 removal plant as an example of CO2 capture at coal-fired power plants. Pet Coal. 2015;57:85–92.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kazemi A, Malayeri M, Gharibi Kharaji A, Shariati A. Feasibility study, simulation and economical evaluation of natural gas sweetening processes - Part 1: a case study on a low capacity plant in iran. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2014;20:16–22.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sharif Dashti S, Shariati A, Khosravi Nikou MR. Sensitivity analysis for selection of an optimum amine gas sweetening process with minimum cost requirement. Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng. 2015;10:709–15.10.1002/apj.1907Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sarker NK. Theoretical effect of concentration, circulation rate, stages, pressure and temperature of single amine and amine mixture solvents on gas sweetening performance. Egypt J Pet. 2016;25:343–54.10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[8] Zahid U, Al Rowaili FN, Ayodeji MK, Ahmed U. Simulation and parametric analysis of CO2 capture from natural gas using diglycolamine. Int J Greenh Gas Control. 2017;57:42–51.10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.12.016Search in Google Scholar

[9] Rochelle GT. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science (80-). 2009;325:1652–4.10.1126/science.1176731Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ghanbarabadi H, Khoshandam B. Simulation and comparison of Sulfinol solvent performance with Amine solvents in removing sulfur compounds and acid gases from natural sour gas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2015;22:415–20.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.12.024Search in Google Scholar

[11] Nejat T, Movasati A, Wood DA, Ghanbarabadi H. Simulated exergy and energy performance comparison of physical–chemical and chemical solvents in a sour gas treatment plant. Chem Eng Res Des. 2018;133:40–54.10.1016/j.cherd.2018.02.040Search in Google Scholar

[12] Borhani TN, Afkhamipour M, Azarpour A, Akbari V, Emadi SH, Manan ZA. Modeling study on CO2 and H2S simultaneous removal using MDEA solution. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;34:344–55.10.1016/j.jiec.2015.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[13] Moioli S, Pellegrini LA, Picutti B, Vergani P. Improved rate-based modeling of H2S and CO2 removal by methyldiethanolamine scrubbing. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:2056–65.10.1021/ie301967tSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Moioli S, Pellegrini LA. Improved rate-based modeling of the process of CO2 capture with PZ solution. Chem Eng Res Des. 2015;93:611–20.10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.022Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jassim MS. Sensitivity analyses and optimization of a gas sweetening plant for hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide capture using methyldiethanolamine solutions. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2016;36:175–83.10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mofarahi M, Khojasteh Y, Khaledi H, Farahnak A. Design of CO2 absorption plant for recovery of CO2 from flue gases of gas turbine. Energy. 2008;33:1311–19.10.1016/ in Google Scholar

[17] Fouad WA, Berrouk AS. Using mixed tertiary amines for gas sweetening energy requirement reduction. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2013;11:12–17.10.1016/j.jngse.2012.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[18] Al-Qahtani MH, Garland P. Khursaniyah gas plant experience with foaming during startup of Karan non-associated gas. In: Int Pet Technol Conf. 2013;1–6.10.2523/IPTC-17175-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Naji SZ, Abd AA. Sensitivity analysis of using diethanolamine instead of methyldiethanolamine solution for GASCO’S Habshan acid gases removal plant. Front Energy. 2019;13:317–24.10.1007/s11708-019-0622-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] van Loo S, van Elk EP, Versteeg GF. The removal of carbon dioxide with activated solutions of methyl-diethanol-amine. J Pet Sci Eng. 2007;55:135–45.10.1016/j.petrol.2006.04.017Search in Google Scholar

[21] GPSA. Engineering data book. Oklahoma, USA: Gas Processors Suppliers Association, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Rumyantseva I, Marketing P, Technology A. Acid gas cleaning using amine solvents: validation with experimental and plant data. Aspen Technol Inc. 2015;2–10.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ghanbarabadi H, Khoshandam B, Wood DA. Simulation of CO 2 removal from ethane with Sulfinol-M+AMP solvent instead of DEA solvent in the South Pars phases 9 and 10 gas processing facility. Petroleum. 2019;5:90–101.10.1016/j.petlm.2018.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kohl AL, Nielsen R. Gas purification. Houston, Texas, USA: Gulf Professional Publishing, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Salkuyeh Y, Mofarahi M. Reduction of CO2 capture plant energy requirement by selecting a suitable solvent and analyzing the operating parameters. Int J Energy Res. 2012;37:973–81.10.1002/er.2899Search in Google Scholar

[26] Banat F, Younas O, Didarul I. Energy and exergical dissection of a natural gas sweetening plant using methyldiethanol amine (MDEA) solution. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2014;16:1–7.10.1016/j.jngse.2013.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[27] Gutierrez JP, Ale Ruiz EL, Erdmann E. Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2017;38:187–94.10.1016/j.jngse.2016.12.036Search in Google Scholar

[28] Abdulrahman RK, Sebastine IM. Natural gas sweetening process simulation and optimization: a case study of Khurmala field in Iraqi Kurdistan region. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2013;14:116–20.10.1016/j.jngse.2013.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[29] Slagle JC. Highly sour amine sweetening process study for conditions common in the middle east. In: The Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 2013:10.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Aliabad Z, Mirzaei S. Removal of CO2 and H2S using aqueous alkanolamine solusions. World Acad Sci. 2009;3:50–9.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Addington L, Ness C. An evaluation of general “ Rules of Thumb ” in amine sweetening unit design and operation. In: Annu Conv Gas Process Assoc, 2010:0–17.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-19
Revised: 2019-12-10
Accepted: 2019-12-13
Published Online: 2020-01-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston