Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 2, 2020

ASU Simulation in Separating Air Components by Refrigeration Distillation (Oxygen and Nitrogen) Using ASPEN HYSYS (Case Study: SIAD Company)

Afshar Alihosseini ORCID logo

Abstract

Currently, air separation units (ASUs) have become very important in various industries, particularly oil and petrochemical industries which provide feed and utility services (oxygen, nitrogen, etc.). In this study, a new industrial ASU was evaluated by collecting operational and process information needed by the simulator by means of HYSYS software (ASPEN-ONE). The results obtained from this simulator were analyzed by ASU data and its error rate was calculated. In this research, the simulation of ASU performance was done in the presence of an expansion turbine in order to provide pressure inside the air distillation tower. Likewise, the cooling capacity of the cooling compartment and the data were analysed. The results indicated that expansion turbine is costly effective. Notably, it not only reduces the energy needed to compress air and supply power of the equipment, but also provides more cooling power and reduces air temperature. Moreover, turbines also increase the concentration of lighter gas products, namely nitrogen.

Highlights

  1. In this study, a new industrial ASU was evaluated by collecting operational and process information needed by the simulator by using HYSYS software (ASPEN-ONE) and the results obtained from this simulator were analyzed by ASU data and its error rate was calculated.

  2. Simulation of ASU performance was done in the presence of an expansion turbine in order to provide pressure inside the air distillation tower that this is a novelty to previous studies.

  3. Detailed instrument as: heat exchanger, cooling tower, expansion turbine, distillation tower, networks for each configuration of the process are designed

  4. Expansion turbine increases nitrogen concentration and decreases oxygen and argon concentration and simulation results in the presence of turbine are very close to experimental and actual results.

  5. The cooling power provided by the expansion turbine for the unit is 1980 kW, which is why the air temperature is lowered.

References

[1] Zhu LY, Chen ZQ, Chen X, Shao ZJ, Qian JX. Simulation and optimization of cryogenic air separation units using a homotopy-based backtracking method. Sep Purif Technol. 2009;67:262–70.10.1016/j.seppur.2009.03.032Search in Google Scholar

[2] Flavio M, Francesco R, Giulia C, Grottoli MG, Marcello A. Intensifying air separation units. Chin J Chem Eng. 2013;35:1249–1254B.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Haijun XU, Wendong LI, Xiuxi Q, Yu A. A novel process for natural gas liquids recovery from oil field associated gas with liquefied natural gas cryogenic energy utilization. Chin J Chem Eng. 2011;19:452, 461.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Amin R, Islam A, Islam R, Islam S. Simulation of N2 gas separation process from air. IOSR J Appl Chem. 2014;6:9–13.10.9790/5736-0650913Search in Google Scholar

[5] Smith AR, Klosek J. A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process Technol. 2001;70:115–34.10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00131-XSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Mahapatra P, Bequette BW. Design and control of an elevated-pressure air separations unit for IGCC power plants in a process simulator environment. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;52:3178–91.10.1021/ie301034eSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Agrawal R. Synthesis of distillation column configurations for a multicomponent separation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1996;35:1059–71.10.1021/ie950323hSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Zhang Q, Wu Z, Cao Z, Jiang Q, Zhou H. Simulation and heat exchanger network designs for a novel single-column cryogenic air separation process. Chin J Chem Eng. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.08.014.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Srinophakun T, Laowithayangkul S, Ishida M. Simulation of power cycle with energy utilization diagram. Energy Convers Manage. 2001;42:1437–56.10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00142-4Search in Google Scholar

[10] Khalel ZA, Rabah AA, Barakat TA. Thermodynamic analysis of ethanol dry reforming: effect of combined parameters. ISRN Thermodyn. 2013;1–4. DOI: 10.1155/2013/253437.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hosseini AA, Hosseini SH. Utilizing solar energy instead of fossil fuels as domestic energy (case study: Dehloran city. Energy Explor Exploit. 2012;30:389–401.10.1260/0144-5987.30.3.389Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bae HK, Kim SY, Lee B. Simulation of CO2 removal in a split-flow gas sweetening process. J Chem Eng. 2011;28:643.10.1007/s11814-010-0446-6Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zhang X, Zhu J, Wu Z, Xiong W, Zhang X, Qiu L. Photochemical process modeling and analysis of ozone generation. Chin J Chem Eng. 2014;22:930–6.10.1016/j.cjche.2014.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[14] Cao Y, Swartz CL, Baldea M. Design for dynamic performance: application to an air separation unit (I). In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2011:2683–8.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Naser SM, Behzad H. Calculation of the Joule–Thomson inversion curves from cubic equations of state. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2000;175:273–84.10.1016/S0378-3812(00)00443-XSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Chacin A, Vasquez JM, Muller EA. Molecular simulation of the Joule-Thomson inversion curve of carbon dioxide. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1999;165:147–55.10.1016/S0378-3812(99)00264-2Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ardali EK, Heybatian E. Cryogenic CO2 capture using cold energy from LNG: innovative synergies between LNG terminals & nearby industries. In: proceedings 24th world gas conference (IAPG), 2009:5–9.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Zhang Y, Chen J, He J, Wu C. Comparison on the optimum performances of the irreversible Brayton refrigeration cycles with regeneration and non-regeneration. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27:401–7.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.07.012Search in Google Scholar

[19] Jaubert JN, Privat R. Relationship between the binary interaction parameters (kij) of the Peng–Robinson and those of the Soave–Redlich–Kwong equations of state: Application to the definition of the PR2SRK model. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2010;295:26–37.10.1016/j.fluid.2010.03.037Search in Google Scholar

[20] Shahin S, Pirouzfar V, Alihosseini A. Performance analysis and development of a refrigeration cycle through various environmentally friendly refrigerants. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;136:1817–30.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Fateen KS–E, Khalil MM, Elnabawy AO. Semi–empirical correlation for binary interaction parameters of the Peng–Robinson equation of state with the van derWaals mixing rules for the prediction of high–pressure vapor–liquid equilibrium. J Adv Res. 2013;4:137–45.10.1016/j.jare.2012.03.004Search in Google Scholar

[22] Schoen M. The Joule–Thomson effect in confined fluids. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl. 1999;270:353–79.10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00189-2Search in Google Scholar

[23] Lopis R, Cabello R, Torrella E. A dynamic model of a shell-and-tube condenser operating in a vapour compression refrigeration plant. Int J Therm Sci. 2008;42:926–34.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.06.021Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-06-06
Revised: 2019-10-03
Accepted: 2019-10-08
Published Online: 2020-04-02

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston