Abstract
What makes the denial of a necessary truth impossible or unintelligible? Barry Stroud argues that there is an answer to this question which avoids Platonism, yet does not force us to adopt Conventionalism about logical necessity. In Part 1, I give a brief characterization of Platonism and Conventionalism and sketch some of the difficulties that arise when trying to explain logical necessity along either of those lines. In Part 2, I will summarize the main points of what Stroud has to say on the matter and raise what I believe to be serious difficulties for his account.
Bibliography
Dummett, Michael (1959): “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics”. In: Philosophical Review 68, pp. 324–348.10.1007/978-1-349-15269-8_16Search in Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry (1965): “Wittgenstein on Logical Necessity”. In: Philosophical Review 74, pp. 504–518. Reprinted in: Barry Stroud (2000): Meaning, Understanding, and Practice. Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.2307/2183126Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1956): Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Edited by Georg Henrik von Wright/Rush Rhees/G. E. M. Anscombe. Transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956; 2nd edition, 1967; 3rd edition, 1978.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2009): Philosophical Investigations. Revised 4th edition. Edited by P. M. S. Hacker/Joachim Schulte. Transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
