Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 20, 2015

Gromov–Witten theory and cycle-valued modular forms

Todor Milanov EMAIL logo , Yongbin Ruan and Yefeng Shen

Abstract

In this paper, we review Teleman’s work on lifting Givental’s quantization of +(2)GL(H) action for semisimple formal Gromov–Witten potential into cohomological field theory level. We apply this to obtain a global cohomological field theory for simple elliptic singularities. The extension of those cohomological field theories over large complex structure limit are mirror to cohomological field theories from elliptic orbifold projective lines of weight (3,3,3), (2,4,4), (2,3,6). Via mirror symmetry, we prove generating functions of Gromov–Witten cycles for those orbifolds are cycle-valued (quasi)-modular forms.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 26800003

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS 1103368

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS 1159265

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS 1405245

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS 1159156

Funding statement: The work of the first author is supported by Grant-In-Aid and by the World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan. The first author is partially supported by JSPS Grant-In-Aid 26800003. The second author is partially supported by NSF grant DMS 1103368, DMS 1159265, DMS 1405245. The third author is partially supported by NSF grant DMS 1159156.

Acknowledgements

The second and third authors would like to thank Hiroshi Iritani for interesting discussions on the convergence of Gromov–Witten theory. The third author would like to thank Emily Clader, Nathan Priddis and Mark Shoemaker for helpful discussions on Givental’s theory. Finally, three of us would like to thank Kavli IPMU for hospitality where the part of this work is carried out. We thank Arthur Greenspoon for editorial assistance.

References

[1] M. Aganagic, V. Bouchard and A. Klemm, Topological strings and (almost) modular forms, Comm. Math. Phys. 277 (2008), no. 3, 771–819. 10.1007/s00220-007-0383-3Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. I. Arnol’d, S. M. Gusein-Zade and A. N. Varchenko, Singularities of differentiable maps. Vol. II: Monodromy and asymptotics of integrals, Monogr. Math. 83, Birkhäuser, Boston 1988. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3940-6Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Berglund and T. Hübsch, A generalized construction of mirror manifolds, Nuclear Phys. B 393 (1993), no. 1–2, 377–391. 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90250-SSearch in Google Scholar

[4] M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Kodaira–Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes, Comm. Math. Phys. 165 (1994), 311–428. 10.1007/BF02099774Search in Google Scholar

[5] W. Chen and Y. Ruan, Orbifold Gromov–Witten theory, Orbifolds in mathematics and physics (Madison 2001), Contemp. Math. 310, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2002), 25–85. 10.1090/conm/310/05398Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Chiodo and Y. Ruan, A global mirror symmetry framework for the Landau–Ginzburg/Calabi–Yau correspondence, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61 (2011), no. 7, 2803–2864. 10.5802/aif.2795Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. Coates and H. Iritani, On the convergence of Gromov–Witten potentials and Givental’s formula, preprint (2012), http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4193v1. 10.1307/mmj/1441116660Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Coates and H. Iritani, in preparation. Search in Google Scholar

[9] B. Dubrovin, Geometry of 2D topological field theories, Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terme 1993), Lecture Notes in Math. 1620, Springer, Berlin (1996), 120–348. 10.1007/BFb0094793Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. B. Givental, Gromov–Witten invariants and quantization of quadratic Hamiltonians, Mosc. Math. J. 1 (2001), no. 4, 551–568, 645. 10.17323/1609-4514-2001-1-4-551-568Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. B. Givental, Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2001 (2001), no. 23, 1265–1286. 10.1155/S1073792801000605Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Hertling, Frobenius manifolds and moduli spaces for singularities, Cambridge Tracts in Math. 151, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002. 10.1017/CBO9780511543104Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. X. Huang, A. Klemm and S. Quackenbush, Topological string theory on compact Calabi–Yau: Modularity and boundary conditions, Homological mirror symmetry, Lecture Notes in Phys. 757, Springer, Berlin (2009), 45–102. 10.1007/978-3-540-68030-7_3Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Kontsevich and Y. I. Manin, Gromov–Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), no. 3, 525–562. 10.1007/BF02101490Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Krawitz, FJRW rings and Landau–Ginzburg mirror symmetry, preprint (2009), http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.0796. Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Krawitz and Y. Shen, Landau–Ginzburg/Calabi–Yau correspondence of all genera for elliptic orbifold 1, preprint (2011), http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.6270. Search in Google Scholar

[17] E. Looijenga, On the semi-universal deformation of a simple-elliptic hypersurface singularity. I: Unimodularity, Topology 16 (1977), no. 3, 257–262. 10.1016/0040-9383(77)90006-4Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. I. Manin, Frobenius manifolds, quantum cohomology, and moduli spaces, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 47, American Mathematical Society, Providence 1999. 10.1090/coll/047Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. Maulik, R. Pandharipande and R. P. Thomas, Curves on K3 surfaces and modular forms. With an appendix by A. Pixton, J. Topol. 3 (2010), no. 4, 937–996. 10.1112/jtopol/jtq030Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Milanov and Y. Ruan, Gromov–Witten theory of elliptic orbifold 1 and quasi-modular forms, preprint (2011), http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2321. Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Milanov and Y. Shen, Global mirror symmetry for invertible simple elliptic singularities, preprint (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6862v2. 10.5802/aif.3012Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, Virasoro constraints for target curves, Invent. Math. 163 (2006), no. 1, 47–108. 10.1007/s00222-005-0455-ySearch in Google Scholar

[23] K. Saito, Einfach-elliptische Singularitäten, Invent. Math. 23 (1974), 289–325. 10.1007/BF01389749Search in Google Scholar

[24] K. Saito, On periods of primitive integrals. I, Preprint 212, Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto 1982. Search in Google Scholar

[25] K. Saito and A. Takahashi, From primitive forms to Frobenius manifolds, From Hodge theory to integrability and TQFT tt*-geometry (Augsburg 2007), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 78, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008), 31–48. 10.1090/pspum/078/2483747Search in Google Scholar

[26] C. Teleman, The structure of 2D semisimple field theories, Invent. Math. 188 (2012), no. 3, 525–588. 10.1007/s00222-011-0352-5Search in Google Scholar

[27] W. Zhang, Modularity of generating functions of special cycles on Shimura varieties, PhD thesis, Columbia University, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-2-2
Published Online: 2015-6-20
Published in Print: 2018-2-1

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.1.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2015-0019/html
Scroll Up Arrow