Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 24, 2014

“Subject” and “Self” in Biosemiotics

On Conditions of a Legitimate Application of “Subject” in Biosemiotics and Prerequisites of a Biosemiotic Approach to the Self

  • Katsiaryna Suryna EMAIL logo
From the journal Chinese Semiotic Studies


This study explicates conditions of application of the terms ‘subject’ and ‘subjectivity’ in both contemporary biosemiotic discourse and the theory of umwelt by Uexkull. The article contrasts biosemiotics with the posthumanist attempt to bridge an ontological gap between human and animal by way of transforming the concept of subject. The limitations on the introduction of ‘subject’ and ‘subjectivity’ in biosemiotics are specified with reference to the biosemiotic project of Jesper Hoffmeyer. The imposition of metaphysical connotations of ‘subject’ are avoided here due to the self being regarded as a result of semiotic processes and the accent on the first-person perspective of experiential life in the notion of subjectivity. The theory of umwelt is examined in view of preconditions of a biosemiotic approach to self.

Published Online: 2014-9-24
Published in Print: 2014-10-1

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.3.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow