Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 9, 2016

Semioticians reflecting on the interdisciplinary character of semiotics

Gloria Withalm
From the journal Chinese Semiotic Studies

References

Anderson, M., Deely, J., Krampen, M., Ransdell, J., Sebeok, T., & Uexküll, J. von. (1984). A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm. Semiotica, 52(1–2): 7–47.Search in Google Scholar

Belon, P. (2001). Voyage au Levant, A. Merle (Ed.). Paris: Chandeigne.Search in Google Scholar

Bernoussi, M. (2014). Viator in tabula, sémiotique de l’interculturel culinaire dans le récit de voyage. Fès: Postmodernité.Search in Google Scholar

Bouissac, P. (Ed.). 1998. Encyclopedia of semiotics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Charmes, G. (1887). Une ambassade au Maroc. Paris: Calmann Levy.Search in Google Scholar

Chevrillon, A. (1906 [1999]). Crépuscule d’Islam, préface de J.F Durand. Casablanca: Eddif.Search in Google Scholar

Cobley, P. (Ed.). (2001). The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cobley, P. (Ed.). (2010). The Routledge companion to semiotics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (2000). Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics, media, and communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (2013). Encyclopedia of media and communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, J. (2007). The primary modeling system in animals. In S. Petrilli (Ed.), Philosophy of language as the art of listening, (pp. 161–179). Bari: Edizione dal Sud.Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1978). Semiotics: A discipline or an interdisciplinary method? InT. Sebeok (Ed)., Sight, sound, and sense, (pp. 73–83). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Favareau, D.(2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Biosemiotics 3, D. Favareau (Ed.). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Fisch, Max. (1981). Introductory Note. In T. Sebeok, Thomas A. The play of musement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Galland, A. (2002).Voyage auLevant, texte établi et annoté par Frédéric Bauden, à partir de l’édition 1678. Paris: Chandeigne.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, A., & Courtès, J. (1979). Sémiotique, dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Search in Google Scholar

Hénault, A. (2014). Semiotic theory and experiences of life. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 10(3): 409–426.Search in Google Scholar

Krampen, M., Oehler, K., Posner, R., & Uexküll, T. von, (Eds.). (1981). Die Welt als Zeichen. Klassiker der modernen Semiotik. Berlin: Severin und Siedler.Search in Google Scholar

Krampen, M., Oehler, K., Posner, R., Sebeok, T., Uexküll, T. von, (Eds.).(1987). Classics of semiotics. New York, London: Plenum.Search in Google Scholar

La Roque, J. de. (1713). Voyage de l’Arabie heureuse par l’océan oriental, fait par les Français pour la première fois dans les années 1708, 1709, et 1710, Avec la relation particulière d’un voyage du port de Moka à la cour du roi d’Yémen, dans la seconde expédition des années1711, 1712 et 1713. Un mémoire concernant l’arbre et le fruit du café. Amsterdam, chez Stenhouwer et Uytwerf, libraires sur le Rockin, vis-à-vis la porte de la Bourse.Search in Google Scholar

Léry, J. de. 1994. Voyage en terre de Brésil, édition établie par F. Lestringuant. Paris: Garnier.Search in Google Scholar

Loti, P. (1996). Au Maroc. Paris: Omnibus.Search in Google Scholar

Marrone, G.(Ed.). (1986). Dove va la semiotica? Palermo: Circolo Semiologico Siciliano.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, C. (1964). Signification and significance: A study of the relations of signs and values. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, I(2). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Now in C. Morris, 1971, (pp. 17–71).Search in Google Scholar

Morris, C. (1948). Signs about signs about signs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, IX, 115–133. Now in C. Morris, 1971, (pp. 434–455).Search in Google Scholar

Morris, C. (1971). Writings on the general theory of signs, Foreword, C. Morris, Terminological note, T. Sebeok. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, W. (1985). Handbuch der Semiotik, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Metzler.Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, W. (1990). A handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1907 [c.]). Prag [R]. MS [R] 322.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C.(1931–1966). The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers is designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C.(1982–). Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., M. Fisch, E. Moore, & C. Kloesel (Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings is designated W followed by volume and page number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1992). Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), N. Houser, & C. Kloesel (Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce is designated EP 1.]Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. (2010). Semioethics. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, (pp. 150–161). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. (2015). Il linguaggio e le lingue. Milan: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. (Ed.). (2004). Linguaggi. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. (Ed.). (2014). Semioetica e comunicazione globale. Milan: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. (Ed.). (2015). Scienze dei linguaggio e linguaggi delle scienze. Intertestualità, interferenze, mutuazioni. Milan: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S., & Ponzio, A. (2003). Semioetica. Rome: Meltemi; Milan: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Petrilli, S., & Ponzio, A. (2005). Semiotics unbounded. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ponzio, A. (1990). Man as a sign.S. Petrilli, Trans. & Intro. Berlin: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R., Robering, K., & Sebeok, T.(Eds.). (1997–2004). Semiotik. Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur/Semiotics. A Handbook on the sign-theoretic foundations of nature and culture. 4 Vols.Berlin: de GruyterSearch in Google Scholar

Rochechouart, L. de. (1997). Journal de voyage à Jérusalem, traduit du latin par Béatrice Dansette à partir de l’édition du texte latin établi par C. Couderc Revue de l’orient latin, Paris, T. 1, 1893 et publié in Croisades et pèlerinage. Paris: R.Laffont.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T.(Ed.). (1986a). Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. (1986b). Survey: On the goals of semiotics. Semiotica, 61(3/4): 369–388.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. (2001a). Global semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. (2001b). Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation, and prospects. Semiotica, 134(1/4): 61–78.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T., & Umiker-Sebeok, J.(Eds.). (1986). The semiotic sphere. New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (Eds.). (1987–1992). The semiotic web 1986 [1987; 1988; 1989; 1990; 1991]. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Taraud, J. (1930). Fès ou les bourgeois de l’Islam. Paris: Plon.Search in Google Scholar

Trifonas, P.(Ed.). (2015). International handbook of semiotics. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, J. von. 1909. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Julius Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Withalm, G. (1988). Depictions – reflections – perspectives. Some remarks on the self-referential discourse on/in semiotics. SemioticaI, 69(1, 2): 149–178.Search in Google Scholar

Withalm, G.(1991). Semiotik zwischen Selbstreflexion und Selbstvermittlung. Erste Ergebnisse einer Umfrage der International Association for Semiotic Studies zur Etablierung von Semiotic and Communication Studies an Hochschulen und Universitäten. InJ. Bernard, W. Enninger, A. Eschbach, & G. Withalm (Hg.), Theoretische und praktische Relevanz der Semiotik. Akten eines internationalen Symposiums, Essen, Dezember 1986, (pp. 295–310). Wien: ISSS.Search in Google Scholar

Withalm, G., & Bernard, J. (1988). Theory of signs – practice of signs. Contours of a Conception. In M. Herzfeld, & L.Melazzo (Eds.), Semiotic theory and practice. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of the IASS, Palermo 1984, (pp. 59–67). Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J., & Yan, Z. (2014). Former Soviet cultural semiotics in China: Reception and transformation. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 10(4): 541–547.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-6-9
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston