Abstract
The unification of the theory of semiotics has been an ambition of the IASS-AIS since the First World Congress in 1974. In his Preface to the Proceedings, Umberto Eco set the participants with certain fundamental tasks, including “providing the discipline with a unified methodology and a unified objective.” At the Second Congress, however, the multitude of topics and approaches led to the prevailing question of the Closing Session: “Can Semiotics Be Unified?” By the Fifth Congress the organizers would claim that theoretical differences “served to strengthen rather than to divide.” This paper traces the origin of this disunity to the writings of Aristotle and their interpretation by late classical and medieval theologians. Received wisdom tells us that linguistic semiology forms a part of general semiotics – the part dealing with either linguistic or conventional signs. This paper overturns that view, demonstrating that (linguistic) relations of equivalence and (semiotic) relations of implication operate in perpendicular planes of semiosis, intersecting at the point of the thing itself. These two planes of semiosis exist as unconnected theories in Aristotle, but become conflated in Augustine. This paper resolves the relationship between semiotics and semiology and in doing so, provides a unified methodology and objective.
About the author
Russell Daylight
Russell Daylight (b. 1968) is a Lecturer in English at Charles Sturt University in Bathurst, Australia. He is the author of What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure? (Edinburgh, 2011) as well as many papers on language, signs, and democracy. Recent papers include “The Language Citizen” (2014) and “The difference between semiotics and semiology” (2012). Most recently, he was the guest editor of Semiotica commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Course in General Linguistics.
References
Arens, Hans. 1984. Aristotle’s theory of language and its tradition: Texts from 500 to 1750. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.29Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. n.d. On interpretation. Trans. E. M. Edghill, http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/interpretation.html (accessed 1 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1963. Categories and De Interpretatione. Trans. J. L. Akrill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258580Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle 1907. De Anima. Trans. R. D. Hicks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1989. Prior analytics. Trans. Robin Smith. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1938. Prior analytics. Trans. Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-prior_analytics.1938Search in Google Scholar
Augustine. n.d. De Dialectica. Trans. J. Marchand. https://faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/texts/dialecticatrans.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Augustine. 1887. De Doctrina Christiana. Trans. J. Shaw. In Paul Schaff (ed.), Nicine and Post-Nicine Fathers, set 1, vol 2. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1969. Sémiologie de la langue. Semiotica 1(1), 1–12.10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Daylight, Russell. 2012. The difference between semiotics and semiology. Gramma/Γράμμα Journal of Theory and Criticism 20. 37–50.Search in Google Scholar
Daylight, Russell. 2017. The semiotic abstraction. Semiotica 218 (Sep.). https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-014810.24308/iass-2014-084Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967. Of grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Roberto Lambertini, Constantino Marmo and Andrea Tabarroni. 1989. On animal language in the Medieval classification of signs. In Umberto Eco and Constantino Marmo (eds.), On the Medieval theory of signs, 3–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/fos.21.03ecoSearch in Google Scholar
Graeser, Andreas. 1977. On language, thought, and reality in Ancient Greek philosophy. Dialectica 31(3/4). 359–388.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1977.tb01293.xSearch in Google Scholar
International Association of Semiotic Studies. n.d. Congresses. http://iassais.org/congresses/ (accessed 1 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. 1972. Aristotle on spoken sounds significant by convention. In John Corcoran (ed.), Ancient logic and its modern interpretations. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Robert Scott, and H. Stuart Jones. 1968. A Greek–English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Manetti, Giovanni. 1993. Theories of the sign in classical antiquity. Trans. Christine Richardson. Bloomington, Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Manetti, Giovanni. 1996. Introduction. In Giovanni Manetti.(ed.), Knowledge through signs: Ancient semiotic theories and practices, 11–35. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, Stephan. 2011. Medieval semiotics. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/semiotics-medieval/ (accessed 1 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah. 2001. Aristotle’s theory of language and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth. Winfried. 1995 Handbook of semiotics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss and Arthur W. Burks. 1965. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. n.d. The republic. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html (accessed 1 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Plato. 1921. Cratlyus. Plato in twelve volumes, vol. 12. Trans. Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996 Aristotle’s De interpretatione: Contradiction and dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
