Abstract
This paper examines how the Peircean category of Firstness can illuminate pre-cognitive and pre-interpretative aspects of learning. This study can be understood as part of a broader edusemiotic project currently gaining momentum (cf. Semetsky (ed.) 2010, 2017; Stables and Semetsky 2014; Olteanu 2015). I explore various iterations of Peirce’s thought, from his early Lowell Lectures (1866) to what Strand (2013) has called his “rhetorical turn” following the introduction of the concept of semiosis in 1883. My contention is that engagement in arts-based processes is educationally useful in inducing and cultivating reflection on those primary aspects of consciousness that are often neglected by formal educational programs. My aim here is to explore what stimulates engaged absorption and examine how this can be applied to form an “education of inquiry” informed by Peirce’s pragmatism, which places contemplation on this pre-interpretative realm of meaning in a central role. In conclusion, the paper will show how an understanding of Firstness is necessary for understanding Peirce’s aesthetics, and thus his ethics, which depends upon the “habits of feeling” emerging from Firstness. Thus, we can understand how the cultivation of a “pedagogy of Firstness” is foundationally an ethical educational program.
About the author
Cary Campbell (b. 1990) is a music educator and musician residing in Vancouver, Canada. He is a PhD candidate in the Faculty of Education at Simon Fraser University and an educational researcher for MODAL research group. He studies the relevance of semiotics and the philosophy of Peirce for conceptualizing the foundations of education. Recent articles include “Learning that reflects the living: Aligning anticipation and edusemiotics” (2017) and “Indexical ways of knowing” (2016). He is also co-founder and editor of the website/magazine philosophasters.org.
Acknowledgement
Thank you to Sandy Gillis, Rita Helena Gomez, Maria Spychiger, Susan O’Neill, Michael Ling, Kalevi Kull, Charlie Pearson, and Marion Benkaiouche for offering guidance on different iterations of this ongoing study. Your assistance and mentorship has been instrumental in the development of this paper and my ongoing research. Thank you most of all to my students. This work is about you and it is for you.
References
Campbell, Cary. 2015a. Educating firstness: An enquiry into Peirce’s domain of firstness and its implications for aesthetic education, Revista Reflexões de Filosofia, 4I(7). 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, Cary. L. 2015b. A dialogue on inquiry. SFU Educational Review 1. 1–18.10.21810/sfuer.v8i.384Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, Cary. 2016. Indexical ways of knowing: An inquiry into the indexical sign and how to educate for novelty, Philosophical Inquiry in Education. 24(1). 15–36.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, Cary. 2017. Learning that reflects the living: Aligning anticipation and rdusemiotics. Public Journal of Semiotics 8(1). 1–25.10.37693/pjos.2017.8.16686Search in Google Scholar
Cunningham, Donald. J. 1998. Cognition as semiosis: The role of inference. Theory & Psychology 8(6). 827–840.10.1177/0959354398086006Search in Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (ed.). 2014[1990]. Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology, 209–226. Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_14Search in Google Scholar
Davey, Nicholas. 2011. Gadamer’s aesthetics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/gadamer-aesthetics/ (accessed 2 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 1990. Basics of semiotics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2001. Four ages of understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442675032Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2009. Augustine and Poinsot: The protosemiotic development. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2014. Semiotic entanglement: The concepts of environment, Umwelt, and Lebenswelt in semiotic perspective. Semiotica, 2014 (199). 7–42.10.1515/sem-2013-0085Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2005 [1934]. Art as experience. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1938. Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York: H. Holt.Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1939. Theory of valuation. Chicago, IL: Chicago UP.Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1954 [1927]. The public and its problems. Athen OH: Shallow Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2000. Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. New York: Harcourt Brace.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2014. From the tree to the labyrinth. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard UP.10.4159/9780674728165Search in Google Scholar
Garrison, Jim. 1999. John Dewey. In the Encyclopaedia of educational philosophy and theory, M. Peters, T. Besley, A. Gibbons, B. Žarnić, P. Ghiraldelli (eds.). http://eepat.net/doku.php?id=dewey_john (accessed 29 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, James. J. 2014[1979]. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. New York: Psychology Press.10.4324/9781315740218Search in Google Scholar
Greene, Maxine. 1977. Toward wide-awakeness: An argument for the arts and humanities in education. The Teachers College Record 79(1). 119–125.10.1177/016146817707900105Search in Google Scholar
Gunnlaugson, Olen, Edward W. Sarath, Charles Scott & Heesoon Bai (eds.). 2014. Contemplative learning and inquiry across disciplines. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gorlée, Dinda. L. 2009. A sketch of Peirce’s Firstness and its significance to art. Σημειωτκή-Sign Systems Studies (1–2). 205–269.10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.08Search in Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2017. Anthropology and/as education. Abingdon (UK): Routledge.10.4324/9781315227191Search in Google Scholar
Kerdeman, Deborah. 2003. Pulled up short: Challenging self-understanding as a focus of teaching and learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education 37(2). 293–308.10.1111/1467-9752.00327Search in Google Scholar
Laughlin, Charles.D. & Eugene G. D’Aquili. 1974. Biogenetic structuralism. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Laughlin, Charles. D. John McManus & Eugene G. d’Aquili. 1990. Brain, symbol & experience: Toward a neurophenomenology of human consciousness. Boston: New Science Library.Search in Google Scholar
Laughlin, Charles. D. 1992. Consciousness in biogenetic structural theory. Anthropology of Consciousness 3(1–2). 17–22.10.1525/ac.1992.3.1-2.17Search in Google Scholar
Laughlin, Charles. D. 1996. The properties of neurognosis. Journal of Social and EvolutionarySystems 19(4). 363–380.10.1016/S1061-7361(96)90004-1Search in Google Scholar
Laughlin, Charles. D. 1997. The cycle of meaning: Some methodological implications of biogenetic structural theory. In Stephen D. Glazier (ed.), Anthropology of religion: A handbook of theory and method, 471–488. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Search in Google Scholar
Laughin, Charles. D. 1998. Neurognosis and expereince. http://biogeneticstructuralism.com/exper.htm (accessed 1 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Laughlin, Charles D. & Jason Throop. 2001. Imagination and reality: On the relations between myth, consciousness, and the quantum sea. Zygon® 36(4), 709–736. Chicago University Press.10.1111/0591-2385.00392Search in Google Scholar
Langer, Susanne. 1957. Philosophy in a new key. 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Search in Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Trans. A. Lingis. The Hague: Nijhoff.Search in Google Scholar
Lonergan, Bernard. 1993. Topics in education (Collected Work of Bernard Lonergan, Volume 10). Robert M. Doran and Frederick E. Crowe (eds.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mandoki, Katya. 2015. The indispensable excess of the aesthetic: Evolution of sensibility in nature. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar
Merrel, Floyd. 1997. Peirce, signs, and meaning. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442678330Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, Patricia. F. 2012. Following contemplative education students’ transformation through their “ground-of-being” experiences. Journal of Transformative Education 10(1). 42–60.10.1177/1541344612455846Search in Google Scholar
Noth, Winfred. 2010. The semiotics of teaching and the teaching of semiotics. In Inna Semetsky (ed.), Semiotics education experience. 1–21. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1163/9789460912252_002Search in Google Scholar
Olteanu, Alin. 2015. Philosophy of education in the semiotics of Charles Peirce: A cosmology oflearning and loving. Oxford: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0353-0718-4Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. S. 1931–1966. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, Arthur W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. S. 1866 [1982]. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Vol. I. Max. H. Fisch (ed). Bloomington, INdiana: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. S. 1867 [1984]. On a new list of categories. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Vol. II, 49–59. Edward. C. Moore (ed). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. S. 1868. Some consequences of four incapacities. Journal of SpeculativePhilosophy 2(3):140–157.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. S. 1877. The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly 12. 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Peters, Richard. S. 1966 [2015]. Ethics and education. Routledge Revivals. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315712383Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2005. Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442657113Search in Google Scholar
Poinsot, John. 1985 [1632]. Tractatus de Signis: The semiotic of John Poinsot. John Deely (ed.) with Ralph A. Powell. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reimer, Bennett. 1991. Essential and nonessential characteristics of aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 25(3). 193–214.10.2307/3333003Search in Google Scholar
Shank, Gary. 1998. The extraordinary ordinary powers of abductive reasoning. Theory & Psychology 8(6). 841–860.10.1177/0959354398086007Search in Google Scholar
Shank, Gary. 2008. Abductive strategies in educational research. The American Journal of Semiotics 5(2). 275–290.10.5840/ajs19875220Search in Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. 2003. Pragmatism between aesthetic experience and aesthetic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22(5). 403–412.10.1023/A:1025127015220Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas. A. 1994. Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. & Marcel Danesi. 2000. The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis (Vol. 1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110816143Search in Google Scholar
Semetsky, Inna. 2005a. Peirce and education: An introduction. Educational Philosophy andTheory 37(2). 153–156.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00106.xSearch in Google Scholar
Semetsky, Inna. 2005b. Peirce’s semiotics, subdoxastic aboutness, and the paradox of inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37(2). 227–238.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00111.xSearch in Google Scholar
Semetsky, Inna. 2010. Semiotics education experience. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1163/9789460912252Search in Google Scholar
Semetsky, Inna. (ed.). 2017. Edusemiotics – A handbook. Singapore: Springer Singapore.10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6Search in Google Scholar
Sheriff, John K. 1994. Charles Peirce’s guess at the riddle: Grounds for human significance. Bloomington, In: Indiana UP.Search in Google Scholar
Strand, Torill. 2013. Peirce’s rhetorical turn: Conceptualizing education as semiosis. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45(7). 789.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00837.xSearch in Google Scholar
Stables, Andrew & Inna Semetsky. 2014. Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. Routledge.10.4324/9781315851860Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
