Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 16, 2019

From Semantics to Semiotics

Re-interpretation of “Shooting an Elephant” and loss of identity of the West in the narrative

Murat Kalelioğlu
From the journal Chinese Semiotic Studies

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the semantic organization of the text “Shooting an Elephant.” The research is carried out with a multidisciplinary perspective using semantic and semiotic data. The theory of semantics is used to examine the words which predominately form the meaning universe of the text. The analysis is fulfilled within the scope of meaning relations as denotation/connotation and synonymy/antonymy in the lexical field. Then the transsentential signs which have a critical role in the construction of the semantic universe of the text are interpreted in the sense of semiotics. The production process of the descriptive, narrative, and thematic meaning layers is revealed throughout the study. Besides bringing the semantic universe of the narrative with its constructive components to light over the course of the study, the impressive dominance of particular signs and their contribution to the narrative are discussed to reveal the loss of identity of the West.



References

Adam, Jean-Michel. 1990. L’analyse linguistique du récit: Rhétorique, poétique et pragmatique textuelle. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 7–24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40617396 (accessed 10 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bhabha, K. Homi. 1999. Remembering Fanon: Self, psyche and the colonial condition. In Nigel Gibson (ed.), Rethinking Fanon: The continuing dialogue 179–196. New York: Humanity Books.Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand, Denis. 2000. Précis de sémiotique littéraire Paris: Nathan-Université.Search in Google Scholar

Boistic, Heidi. 2006. Introduction. In The semiotics of discourse Jacques Fontanille. New York: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-1-4539-0954-6Search in Google Scholar

Büyükkarcı, Orhun. 2018. Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe’s horror stories from the perspective of literary semiotics Dissertation. İstanbul: İstanbul Aydın University.Search in Google Scholar

Büyükkarcı, Orhun & Türkay Bulut. 2018. On meaning production process in short stories: A semiotic approach to Hwang Sunwon’s “Cranes.” IJLA 6(5). 230–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.18033/ijla.4047 (accessed 12 February 2019).10.18033/ijla.4047Search in Google Scholar

Chandler, Daniel. 2004. The basics of semiotics London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cobley, Paul (ed.). 2005. Introduction. In Companion to semiotics and linguistics London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.10.4324/9780203996089Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, Alan. 2006. A glossary of semantics and pragmatics Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748626892Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2017. Semiotics as a metalanguage for the sciences. In Kristian Bankov and Paul Cobley (eds.) Semiotics and its masters 61–81. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501503825-004Search in Google Scholar

De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in general linguistics Translation by Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library.Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1983. Narrative discourse Translation by Jane E. Lewin. Ithaca and New York: Cornell University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Catherine Porter. 1971. Elements of a narrative grammar. Diacritics 7(1). 23–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/464872 (accessed 23 December 2018).10.2307/464872Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1971. Narrative grammar: Units and levels. MLN 86(6). 793–806. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2907443 (accessed 5 January 2019).10.2307/2907443Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and languageAn analytical dictionary Translation by Larry Crist and Daniel Patte. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An introduction to semantics and pragmatics Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Guiraud, Pierre. 1999. Anlambilim Translation by Berke Vardar. İstanbul: Multilingual Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Günay, V. Doğan. 2013. Metin Bilgisi 4th edn. İstanbul: Papatya Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Günay V. Doğan. 2007. Sözcükbilime Giriş İstanbul: Multilingual.Search in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis. 2011. Tools for text and image analysis: An introduction to applied semiotics Translation by Julie Tabler. Version 3. Semantic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8efb/82b11a799ff9481354036b5bab3140632213.pdf(accessed 22 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Kalelioğlu, Murat. 2017. The theory of signification: Semiotic criticism and literature. IJLA 5(8). 169–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3809 (accessed 22 December 2017).10.18033/ijla.3809Search in Google Scholar

Kalelioğlu, Murat. 2018a. A literary semiotics approach to the semantic universe of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kalelioğlu, Murat. 2018b. Multidisciplinary approach to the texts: Semiotic analysis of the process of meaning construction in O. Henry’s The Gift of the Magi In M. Nesim Doru & Ömer Bozkurt (eds.), Dil Bilimleri: Klasik Sorunlar-Güncel Tartışmalar 811–865. Mardin: Mardin Artuklu University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kalelioğlu, Murat. 2018c. Creating society in Orwell’s 1984: A semiotic analysis of the notion of social transformation. Chinese Semiotic Studies 144(4). 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2018-0027 (accessed 18 December 2018).10.1515/css-2018-0027Search in Google Scholar

Kalelioğlu, Murat & V. Doğan Günay. 2018. Analysis of Duha Koca Oğlu Deli Dumrul narrative within the framework of literary semiotics. Turkish Studies: International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 13(5). 229–256. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12890 (accessed 11 March 2019).10.7827/TurkishStudies.12890Search in Google Scholar

Kıran, Zeynel & Ayşe Eziler Kıran. 2013. Dilbilime Giriş 4th edn. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Floch Jean-Marie. 1985. Mais qu’est-ce donc que la sémiotique? (But just what is semiotics?). Le Français Dans Le Monde 197. 44–47.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Bronwen & Felizitas Ringham. 2000. Dictionary of semiotics London: Cassel.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Bronwen & Felizitas Ringham. 2006. Key terms in semiotics London and New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Quinn, Edward. 2009. Critical companion to George Orwell New York: Facts On File Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Oakley, Todd. 2009. From attention to meaning: Explorations in semiotics, linguistics, and rhetoric Bern: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0782-1Search in Google Scholar

Orwell, George. 1950. Shooting an Elephant and other essays London: Secker and Warburg.Search in Google Scholar

Thibault, J. Paul. 1997. Re-reading Saussure: The dynamics of signs in social life Oxon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tarasti, Eero. 2017. The semiotics of A. J. Greimas: A European intellectual heritage seen from the inside and the Outside. Sign System Studies 45(1/2). 1406–4243 http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2017.45.1-2.03 (accessed 25 January 2019).10.12697/SSS.2017.45.1-2.03Search in Google Scholar

Yücel, Tahsin. 2015. Yapısalcılık 3rd edn. İstanbul: Can Sanat Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Yücel, Tahsin. 1979. Anlatı Yerlemleri: Kişi, Süre, Uzam İstanbul: Ada Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-16
Published in Print: 2019-08-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow