Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 26, 2020

Learning for Adaptation

An edusemiotic perspective on intercultural communication competence

Juming Shen, Yu Sheng and Ying Zhou
From the journal Chinese Semiotic Studies

Abstract

The conceptualization of intercultural communication competence (ICC) has been updated tentatively since it was formulated in the 1970s. A common recognition is that development of ICC can only be realized through an individual’s adaptation, which results from the integration of the multiple forces within the individuals themselves. However, most of the existing research on ICC has focused on the conscious aspects of competence like abilities or skills that are distinguishable, that is, what to adapt, rather than the less conscious aspect, or its correlation with the unconscious part, that is, the how to adapt, or what the process of adaptation is. The absence of investigation into the adaptation process may have been a consequence of the educational context of studies on ICC, which depends much on, or is heavily affected by, the Cartesian dualistic viewpoints that emphasize the dichotomy of mind–body while ignoring the “middle” in between. Based on our previous semiotic analysis that explained the process of intercultural communication as a form of semiosis, this paper adopts more perspectives from edusemiotics to conceptualize learning following a triadic framework with emphasis on the process as the “middle,” which renders it possible to reflect on the process of individuals’ adaptation in contexts of intercultural communication.

References

Bass, Randall V. & J. W. Good. 2004. Educare and educere: Is a balance possible in the educational system? The Educational Forum 68(2). 161–168.Search in Google Scholar

Beamer, Linda & Iris I. Varner. 2008. Intercultural communication in the global workplace, 3rd edn. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bertucio, Brett. 2017. The Cartesian heritage of Bloom's taxonomy. Studies in Philosophy & Education 36(4). 477–497.Search in Google Scholar

Byram, Michael. 1997. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Byram, Michael. 2011. Intercultural citizenship from an international perspective. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy 1(1). 10–20.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Cary. 2018. Returning “learning” to education: Toward an ecological conception of learning and teaching. Sign Systems Studies 46(4). 538–568.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Cary. 2019. Educating semiosis: Foundational concepts for an ecological edusemiotic. Studies in Philosophy and Education 38(3). 291–317.Search in Google Scholar

Canale, Michael & Merrill Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1(1). 1–47.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming. 1989. Relationships of the dimensions of intercultural communication competence. Communication Quarterly (37). 118–133.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming. 2005. A model of global communication competence. China Media Research 1. 3–11.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming. 2007. Media (literacy) education in the United States. China Media Research 3(3). 87.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming. 2010. Foundations of intercultural communication competence. Hong Kong: China Review Academic Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming. 2014. Intercultural communication competence: Summary of 30-year research and directions for future study. In Guo-Ming Chen & Xiaodong Dai (eds.), Intercultural communication competence: Conceptualization and its development in cultural contexts and interactions, 14–40. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming & Xiaodong Dai (eds.). 2014. Intercultural communication competence: Conceptualization and its development in cultural contexts and interactions. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Ming & William J. Starosta. 1996. Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. In Brant R. Burleson (ed.), Communication Yearbook 19, 353–383. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2010. Foreword: Edusemiotics. In Inna Semetsky (ed.), Semiotics Education Experience, vii–xi. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Deardorff, Darla K. 2006. Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education 10(3). 241.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John & Inna Semetsky. 2017. Semiotics, edusemiotics and the culture of education. Educational Philosophy & Theory 49(3). 207–219.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1916/1924. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan Company.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1925/1958. Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2018. Giorgio Prodi and the lower threshold of semiotics. Sign Systems Studies 42(2/3). 161–167.Search in Google Scholar

Ergül, Hakan & Tim Ingold. 2017. On anthropology, education and university: An interview with Tim Ingold. Moment Journal 4(1). 7–13.Search in Google Scholar

Fantini, Alvino E. 1995. Language, culture, and world view: Exploring the nexus. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19(2). 143–153.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Yongchen. 2014. 中国大学生跨文化交际能力测评体系研究 [Developing a conceptual framework for assessing Chinese college students' intercultural communication competence]. Foreign Language World (4). 80–87.Search in Google Scholar

Gudykunst, William B. 1995. Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In Richard L. Wiseman (ed.), Intercultural communication theory, 8–58. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Gudykunst, William B. 2005. An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of strangers' intercultural adjustment. In William B. Gudykunst (ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 419–457. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In John B. Pride & Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269–285. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Young Yun. 1986. Understanding the social context of intergroup communication: A personal network approach. In William B. Gudykunst (ed.), Intergroup communication, 86–95. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Young Yun. 1991. Intercultural communication competence: A systems theoretic view. In Stella Ting-Toomey & Felipe Korzenny (eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication, 259–275. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Young Yun. 1995. Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In Richard L. Wiseman (ed.), Intercultural communication theory, 170–193. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi. 2018. Choosing and learning: Semiosis means choice. Sign Systems Studies 46(4). 452–466.Search in Google Scholar

Lustig, Myron W. & Jolene Koester. 2010. Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures, 6th edn. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Judith N. & Mitchell R. Hammer. 1989. Behavioral categories of intercultural communication competence: Everyday communicators' perceptions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 13(3). 303–332.Search in Google Scholar

Muhammad Umar, Nadeem, Mohammed Rosli & DalibSyarizan. 2018. An overview of dominant research approaches to measure intercultural communication competence (ICC). International Journal of Educational Research Review (4). 141.Search in Google Scholar

Olteanu, Alin. 2014. The semiosic evolution of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48(3). 457–473.Search in Google Scholar

Patricia, M. King & Marcia B. Baxter Magolda. 2005. A developmental model of intercultural maturity. Journal of College Student Development 46(6). 571–592.Search in Google Scholar

Pikkarainen, Eetu. 2014. Competence as a key concept of educational theory: A semiotic point of view. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48(4). 621–636.Search in Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis. 2011. An explorer upon untrodden ground: Peirce on abduction. In Dov M. Gabbay, Stephan Hartmann & John Woods (eds.), Handbook of the history of logic, 117– 151. Holland: North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, Everett, William Hart & Yoshitaka Miike. 2002. Edward T. Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review 24. 3–26.Search in Google Scholar

Samovar, Larry A., Richard E. Porter, Edwin R. McDaniel & Carolyn S. Roy. 2017. Communication between cultures, 9th edn. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, Wendy & Collleen Ward. 1990. The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 14. 449–464.Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna (ed.) 2010. Semiotics Education Experience. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna. 2014. Taking the edusemiotic turn: A body~mind approach to education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48(3). 490–506.Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna. 2015. Edusemiotics: The Tao of education. Language and Semiotic Studies (1). 130–143.Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna & Andrew Stables. 2014. Pedagogy and edusemiotics: Theoretical challenges/practical opportunities. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Juming. 2010. The process of intercultural communication: A semiotic perspective. Chinese Semiotics Studies 3. 75–133.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Juming & Yongchen Gao. 2015a. 基于知行合一模式的中国大学生跨文化交际能力测评量表构建研究 [Construction of an intercultural communication competence inventory for Chinese college students based on the Knowing-and-Doing model]. Foreign Languages in China 2015(3). 14–21.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Juming & Yongchen Gao. 2015b. 思与行的互动:思辨能力与跨文化交际能力 [Interaction of thinking and doing: Critical thinking skills and intercultural communication competence]. Academic Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (3). 149–153.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Juming & Xiaojun Su. 2015. Photographic illustrations in Chinese college English textbooks: A semiotic analysis. Language and Semiotic Studies 1. 144–160.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Spitzberg, Brian H. & Gabrielle Changnon. 2009. Conceptualizing intercultural competence In D. K. Deardorff (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence, 2–45. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Stables, Andrew. 2018. Semiotic theory of learning: New perspectives in the philosophy of education. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stables, Andrew & Inna Semetsky. 2014. Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ting-Toomey, Stella. 1993. Communicative resourcefulness: An identity negotiation perspective. In Richard L. Wiseman & Jolene Koester (eds.), Intercultural communication competence, 72–111. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Ting-Toomey, Stella & Atsuko Kurogi. 1998. Facework competence in intercultural: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22. 187–225.Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Colleen & Jessie Wilson. 2014. Conceptualizing, measuring and predicting intercultural competence. In Guo-Ming Chen & Xiaodong Dai (eds.), Intercultural communication competence: Conceptualization and its development in cultural contexts and interactions, 40–70. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Wiseman, Richard L., Mitchell R. Hammer & Hiroko Nishida. 1989. Predictors of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 13(3). 349– 370.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-26
Published in Print: 2020-11-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston