Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 12, 2021

Conceptual metaphor and media bias: a critical metaphor analysis of British and American mainstream media reports on the Hong Kong riots

Xuan Ji
From the journal Chinese Semiotic Studies

Abstract

This article makes a comparative analysis of the use of metaphors in the Hong Kong riot reports by British and American mainstream media. The analysis reveals the conceptualization process of events and finds that the use of metaphors is mainly concentrated in the war domain, the flare domain, and the natural forces domain.


Corresponding author: Xuan Ji, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China, E-mail:

References

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230000612Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar

Ding, Jianxin & Yong Qin. 2013. 社会认知批评话语分析中的非政治化和突生结构——以龙卷风Sandy新闻报道为例 [Depoliticization and emergent structure in discourse analysis of social cognitive criticism: Taking Hurricane Sandy news reports as an example]. Foreign Language Research 2013(2). 8–13.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174220Search in Google Scholar

Gamson, William A. 1989. News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist 3(2). 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033002006.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ji, Yuhua & Yan Chen. 2007. 批评话语分析的新方法:批评隐喻分析 [A new approach to critical discourse analysis: Critical metaphor analysis]. Journal of Xiamen University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2007(6). 42–48.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In Wodak Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 95–99. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n5Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2002. Political discourse and political cognition. In Chilton Paul & Christina Schaffner (eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse, 203–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.4.11dijSearch in Google Scholar

Wang, Hui & Bin Xin. 2019. 美国媒体对中国形象的隐喻建构研究——以“美国退出TPP”相关报道为例 [American media’s metaphorical construction of the Chinese image: Taking “American withdrawal from TPP” as an example]. Foreign Language Teaching 2019(5). 32–38.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Xueye. 2017. 媒介话语动员:建构民族团结的一种策略—基于西北多民族新闻报道的框架分析 [Media discourse mobilization: A strategy for constructing national unity: A framework analysis based on the multi-ethnic news reports in Northwest China]. Journalism 2017(3). 2–7.Search in Google Scholar

Xin, Bin. 2012. 批评话语分析中的认知话语分析 [Cognitive discourse analysis in critical discourse analysis]. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching 2012(4). 1–5.Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Ying. 2004. 论战争隐喻的普遍性及文化渊源 [On the universality and cultural origin of war metaphors]. Foreign Languages Research 2004(4). 36–39.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Guoyong & Yong Chen. 2016. 中美政治隐喻差异性理据及特点分析 [Analysis of the differences and characteristics of political metaphors between China and the United States]. Hunan Social Science 2016(5). 36–39.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Hongying. 2014. 批评话语分析的认知语言学方法 [Cognitive linguistic approach to critical discourse analysis]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Science Edition) 2014(2). 19–25.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-05-12
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow