Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access November 24, 2017

The Frankenstein Meme: Penny Dreadful and The Frankenstein Chronicles as Adaptations

Barbara Braid
From the journal Open Cultural Studies

Abstract

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) is one of the most adaptable and adapted novels of all time, spurring countless renditions in film, television, comic books, cartoons, and other products of popular culture. Like a meme, this story adapts itself to changing cultural contexts by replication with mutation. This article examines the adaptive and appropriative features of two recent examples of such renditions in the form of television series, Penny Dreadful (2014-2016) and The Frankenstein Chronicles (2015). It discusses palimpsestic appropriations used in these shows, their depiction of Frankenstein and his Creatures, and above all, the themes and their meanings which these twenty-first-century appropriations of Frankenstein offer.

References

Aynsley, E. E., and W. A. Campbell. “Johann Konrad Dippel, 1673-1734.” Medical History 6.3 (July 1962): 281-6. PubMed Central. Web. 28 August 2017. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1034731/>10.1017/S0025727300027411Search in Google Scholar

Bartoněk, Antonin. “Mycenaean words in Homer.” Clairis, Christos. Recherches en linquistique grecque. L’Harmattan, 2002. 91-4. Google Book Search. Web. 12 August 2017. <https://books.google.pl/books?id=KKWlkCfX1ZsC&hl=pl&source=gbs_navlinks_s>Search in Google Scholar

Blackmore, Susan. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, William. “The Little Girl Lost.” Blake. The Complete Poems. Ed. W. H. Stevenson. 3rd ed. Harrow: Pearson Longman, 2007: 75-7. Google Book Search. Web. 20 August 2017. <https://books.google.pl/books?id=JKSOAwAAQBAJ&dq=Blake.+The+Complete+Poems&hl=pl&source=gbs_navlinks_s>Search in Google Scholar

Branagh, Kenneth. Dir. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. TriStar Pictures, 1994. Film.Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, Mel. Dir. Young Frankenstein. Gruskoff/Venture Films, 1974. Film.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Samantha J. “Putting the ‘Neo’ Back into Neo-Victorian: The Neo-Victorian Novel as Postmodern Revisionist Fiction.” Neo-Victorian Studies 3.2 (2010): 172-205. Web. 12 August 2013. <http://www.neovictorianstudies.com/>Search in Google Scholar

Creed, Barbara. The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminine, Psychoanalysis. 1993. London and New York: Routledge, 2012. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Floresu, Radu. In Search of Frankenstein: Exploring the Myth Behind Mary Shelley’s Monster. London: Robson Books, 1996. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Stephanie. “Lily Frankenstein: The Gothic New Woman in Penny Dreadful.” Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media 28, June 2017. Web. 12 July 2017. <http://refractory.unimelb.edu.au/2017/06/14/green/>Search in Google Scholar

Grove, Philip B. “Proteus.” Wester’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged. Cologne: Könemann, 1993. 1824. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda, with Siobhan O’Flynn. A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2013. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991. Print.10.1215/9780822378419Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Cora. Victoriana-Histories, Fictions, Criticism. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 2007. Print.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748611478.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kirchknopf, Andrea. “(Re)workings of Nineteenth-Century Fiction: Definitions, Terminology, Contexts.” Neo-Victorian Studies 1.1 (2008): 53-80. Web. 5 April 2009. <http://www.neovictorianstudies.com/>Search in Google Scholar

Kohlke, Marie-Luise. “Neo-Victorian Biofiction and the Special/Spectral Case of Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus.” Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies 18.3 (2013): 4-21. Sydney Open Journals Online. Web. 3 May 2017. <https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/AJVS/article/view/9382>Search in Google Scholar

Kosofsky Sedgwick, Eve. The Coherence of Gothic Conventions. New York and London: Methuen, 1980. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Lackey, Michael. “Locating and Defining the Bio in Biofiction.” a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 31.1 (2016): 3-10. Taylor and Francis Online. Web. 3 May 2017. <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989575.2016.1095583>10.1080/08989575.2016.1095583Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Alison and Frederick D. King. “From Text, to Myth, to Meme: Penny Dreadful and Adaptation.” Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens 82 (2015). Revues.org. Web. 12 July 201. <https://cve.revues.org/2343> Search in Google Scholar

Leitch, Thomas. “Adaptation and Intertextuality, or, What isn’t an Adaptation, and What Does it Matter?” A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation. Ed. Deborah Cartmell. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2012: 87-104. Print.10.1002/9781118312032.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Letissier, Georges. “Dickens and Post-Victorian Fiction.” Refracting the Canon in Contemporary British Literature and Film. Ed. Susana Onega and Christian Gutleben. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi, 2004. 111-128. Print.10.1163/9789401208307_008Search in Google Scholar

Marsden, Jean I. “Introduction.” The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of The Works and the & Myth. Ed. Jean I. Mardsen. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991: 1-28. Google Books Search. Web. 21 August 2017. <https://books.google.pl/books/about/The_Appropriation_of_Shakespeare.html?id=VTlaAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y>Search in Google Scholar

Milton, John. (1667). Paradise Lost. London: Charles Tilt, 1838. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Moulin, Joanny. “Biofiction.” The Biography Society. Web. 3 March 2017. <http://biographysociety.org/tag/biofiction/>Search in Google Scholar

Peake, Richard Brinsley. Presumption, or the Fate of Frankenstein. [1823] (August 2011). Romantic Circles. Web. 11 July 2017 <http://www.rc.umd.edu/editions/peake/index.html>Search in Google Scholar

Penny Dreadful. Prod. John Logan. New York: Showtime Networks, 2014-2016. Television.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, Dennis R. “The Recombinant Mystery of Frankenstein: Experiments in Film Adaptation.” The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies. Ed. Thomas Leitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 137-53. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Poore, Benjamin. “The Transformed Beast: Penny Dreadful, Adaptation, and the Gothic.” Victoriographies 6.1 (2016): 62-81. Edinburgh University Press. Web. 27 August 2017. <http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/vic.2016.0211>10.3366/vic.2016.0211Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Shelley, Mary W. Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus. 1818, 1831. Boston and Cambridge: Sever, Francis & Co., 1869. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Sweet, Matthew. Inventing the Victorians. London: Faber and Faber, 2001. Print.Search in Google Scholar

The Frankenstein Chronicles. Prod. Benjamin Ross. London: ITV, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Tropp, Martin. “Re-Creating the Monster. Frankenstein and Film.” Nineteenth-Century Women at the Movies: Adapting Classic Women’s Fiction to Film. Ed. Barbara Lupack. Bowling Green: Popular Press, 1999: 23-77. Print.Search in Google Scholar

Whale, James. Dir. Bride of Frankenstein. Universal Pictures, 1935. Film.Search in Google Scholar

Yousef, Nancy. “The Monster in a Dark Room: Frankenstein, Feminism and Philosophy.” Modern Language Quarterly 63.2 (June 2002): 197-226. Project Muse. Web. 28 August 2017. <https://muse.jhu.edu/article/22939>10.1215/00267929-63-2-197Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-01
Accepted: 2017-11-05
Published Online: 2017-11-24
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow