Abstract
This paper reviews the implications for research in cultural literacy of the current hypothesis that revolutionary advances in communication technology are inseparable from an over-reliance on emotion, both in the representation of global disaster and human suffering and as a means of manipulating public behaviour in the political and commercial spheres. It explores the view that feeling has become a simulacrum or form of “hyperreality” whose “contagion” through targeted exploitation is an obstacle to deeper understanding of social processes. It summarises the challenges which this presents for research into the nature of cultural literacy by critically considering three current paradigms: affect theory, clinical psychology including neuroscience, and memetics with due regard for recent attempts to model social behaviour through computer-based simulation. Its conclusions are that historical comparisons between past and present of the processes whereby cultural artefacts mediate emotion, combined with highly contextualised empirical fieldwork into their contemporary impact, should be key foci of critical research into cultural literacy, using the full range of technological instruments available.
References
Adams, Tim. “How did we end up with Donald Trump? Interview with Francis Fukuyama.” The Observer New Review, 16 September 2018, pp.8-11.Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press, 201410.4324/9780203700372Search in Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame. The Lies that Bind. Rethinking Identity. Profile Books, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Avidsson, Adam. “General Sentiment: How Value and Affect Converge in the Information Economy.” The Sociological Review, vol.59, pp. 39-59, www.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02.02052.x .10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02052.xSearch in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies, Gallimard, 1957.Search in Google Scholar
Batson, Daniel. “These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena.” The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, edited by Jean Decety and William Ickes, MIT Press, 2009, Chap. 2.10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Batson, Daniel and Edwin Rutsch. “Definitions of Empathy.” YouTube, 5 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4s-pt7ZYtQ>.Search in Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacres et Simulation. Galilées, 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. “Cruel Optimism: On Marx, Loss and the Senses.” New Frontiers, vol. 63, Winter 2007-8, pp. 33-51.Search in Google Scholar
Bhazin, Hitesh. “AIO-Activities, Interests and Opinions.” Marketing91, 2 Apr. 2017, www.marketing91.com/psychographicsegmentation.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. The Bodley Head, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Le Sens pratique. Les Editions de Minuit, 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Verso, 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Crossick, Geoffrey and Kaszynska, Patrycja. Understanding the Value of Arts and Culture. The AHRC Cultural Value Project. March 2017, www.ahrc.ac.uk/documents/publications/cultural-value-project-final-report/.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, William. “Red alert.” The Guardian, 8 September 2018, pp. 8-11.Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Edmonds, Bruce. “The Revealed Poverty of the Gene-Meme Analogy. Why Memetics per se has Failed.” Journal of Memetics-Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, vol 9, www.cfpm.org/jom-emit/2005/vol9/edmonds_b.html .Search in Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition. Profile Books, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Geoghegan, Peter. “Brexit means Brexit but what does Brexit mean?” Political Insight, vol. 8, iss.1, March 2017, p.3 www.doi.org/10.1177/2041905817702740.10.1177/2041905817702740Search in Google Scholar
Gibbons, Susan. “Understanding Empathy as a Complex Construct: A Review of the Literature.” Clinical Social Work Journal. Vol. 39, issue 3, 2011, pp. 243-252.10.1007/s10615-010-0305-2Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper and Row, 1974.Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Mary-Catherine. “The Paradox of Fiction and the Ethics of Empathy: Reconceiving Dickens’ Realism.” Narrative Vol. 16, no. 3, October 2008, pp. 256-278, www.muse.jhu.edu/article/249543.10.1353/nar.0.0007Search in Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. “Essentialist Reading.” FT Weekend. 8-9 September 2018, p. 8.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Howard. “Dramatic Speech: The Frozen Wastes of Emojiland.” BBC iplayer A Point of View, 31 Dec. 2017, www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09jxd2n.Search in Google Scholar
Jager, Wander. “Enhancing the Realism of Simulation (EROS): On Implementing and Developing Psychological Theory in Social Simulation.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20, no. 3, 2017, www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/20/3/14.html10.18564/jasss.3522Search in Google Scholar
Jankowiak-Siuda, K., Rymarczyk, K., Grabowska, A. “How we Empathise with Others: a Neurobiological Perspective.” Medical Science Monitor, 17 (1) January 2017.10.12659/MSM.881324Search in Google Scholar
Kaszynska, Patrycja. “Capturing the Vanishing Point: Subjective Experiences and Cultural Value.” Cultural Trends vol. 24, no. 3, July 2015, www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09548963.2015.1066077. The Cultural Value Scoping Project. AHRC, 2018, www.ahrc.ukri.org/documents/project-reports-and-reviews/cultural-value-scoping-project.10.1080/09548963.2015.1066077Search in Google Scholar
Krotoski, Aleks. Untangling the Web. Faber & Faber, 2013. “The Digital Human.” BBC, August 2017, www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01n7094.html.Search in Google Scholar
Małecki, Wojciech. “Entangled Empathy, Animal Narratives and Moral Mobility.” Unpublished Paper delivered at the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, CLE conference (e)motion, May 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Marsden, Paul. “Crash Contagion.” Unpublished Paper delivered at the University of Sussex conference Death and Diana, 1997., www.members.tripod.com/~Paul_Marsden/Crash-Contagion.html.Search in Google Scholar
---. “Memetics and Social Contagion: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” Journal of Memetics, vol. 2, 1998, www.jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/marsden_p.html .Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, Tom. “How Russia used social media to divide Americans.” The Guardian, 14 Oct. 2017, www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/14/russia-us-politics-social-media-facebook.Search in Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill, 1964.Search in Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. Politics of Affect. Polity Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. “President Obama Observes Diwali and Calls for Empathy.” YouTube, 14th November 2009, www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pjj3aJS7A4 .Search in Google Scholar
Ranciere, Jacques. Le Partage du Sensible. Esthétique et Politique. La Fabrique Editions, 2000.10.3917/lafab.ranci.2000.01Search in Google Scholar
Rea, Ernie. “Beyond Belief: Religious Polls.” BBC, 13 Sep. 2017, www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0952jkc.Search in Google Scholar
Rutsch, Edwin. “How to Build a Culture of Empathy.” Youtube, September 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pjj3aJS7A4.Search in Google Scholar
Seigworth, Gregory. “An Inventory of Shimmers.” The Affect Theory Reader. Edited by Gregory Seigworth and Melissa Gregg. Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 1-5.10.1215/9780822393047Search in Google Scholar
Shane, Scott. “To Sway Vote, Russia used Army of Fake Americans.” The New York Times, 9-10 Sep. 2017, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Tania. “The Neuroscience of Compassion.” Youtube, March 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-hKS4rucTY.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, Tania and Lamm, C. “The Social Neuroscience of Empathy.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, no. 1156, 2009, pp. 81-96, www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418 .10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418Search in Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. Hamish Hamilton, 2003.10.3917/dio.201.0127Search in Google Scholar
Weaver, Matthew. “Twitter Founder: Trump Presidency is Product of Short Attention Spans” The Guardian, 13 Sep. 2017, www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/sep/13/twitter-founder-trump-presidency-short-attention-spans-evan-williams .Search in Google Scholar
© by Robert Crawshaw, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
