Abstract
This essay reprises the status of objects in relation to critical conversations that favor things and thing studies over other methodologies of material culture studies. Recent discussions have dismissed objects as passive foils that lack in meaning. Glossing the factor of representation, however, these discussions have also glossed over a factor crucial in shaping the way in which the distinction between objects and things is made accessible in theory and practice. Two examples taken from eighteenth-century American literary culture, an anecdote by Benjamin Franklin and a sales ad published by the Pennsylvania Gazette, illustrate how in the process of representation objects become imbued with significance that reaches beyond mere signification and object classification. Once conceived as ‘material signs,’ objects become participants in cognitive environments in which seemingly meaningless symbols foster meaningful engagement with materiality.
Works Cited
“The Art of Making Paper,” The Universal Magazine of Knowledge and Pleasure, Vol. X, XXX, and XXXII (March, 1762 to April, 1763): 12.Search in Google Scholar
“JUST imported from London.” The Pennsylvania Gazette, vol. 7, no. 828 (1744): 1-4.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Responsibility of Forms. Hill and Wang, 1985.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Linda. What Clothes Reveal. The Language of Clothing in Colonial and Federal America. Yale University Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, 2010.10.1215/9780822391623Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein, Robin. Racial Innocence. Performing American Childhood from Slavery to Civil Rights. New York University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Bill. A Sense of Things. The University of Chicago Press, 2003.10.7208/chicago/9780226076317.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Things, edited by Bill Brown, The University of Chicago Press, 2004, pp. 1-22.Search in Google Scholar
Candlin, Fiona and Rayford Guins. “Introducing Objects.” The Object Reader, edited by Fiona Candlin and Rayford Guins, Routledge Press, 2009, pp. 1-18.Search in Google Scholar
Chevrier, Jean-Francois. The Year 1967: From Art Objects to Public Things, Or Variations on the Conquest of Space. Fundacio Antoni Tapies, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History Across Cultures. Routledge Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Coole, Diana and Samantha Frost. “Introducing the New Materialisms.” New Materialisms. Ontology, Agency, Politics, edited by Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 1-43.10.1215/9780822392996-001Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, 1976.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Haltman, Kenneth. “Introduction.” American Artifacts. Essays in Material Culture, edited by Jules David Prown and Kenneth Haltman, Michigan State University Press, 2000, pp. 1-10.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Speculative Realism. An Introduction. Polity Press, 2018.10.1007/978-3-030-28987-4_44Search in Google Scholar
Hills, Richard L. Papermaking in Britain 1488-1988. A Short History. Athlone Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Hudek, Antony. The Object. Whitechapel Gallery and The MIT Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Hunter, Dard. Papermaking. The History and Technique of an Ancient Craft. Dover Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. “An Anecdote of Doctor Franklin.” Letter from December 4, 1818. http://tjrs.monticello.org/letter/27Search in Google Scholar
Krill, John. English Artists’ Paper. Renaissance to Regency. Oak Knoll Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Malafouris, Lambros. How Things Shape the Mind. A Theory of Material Engagement. The MIT Press, 2013.10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude. An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Continuum Press, 2008.10.5040/9781350252059Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. “Materiality: An Introduction.” Materiality, edited by Daniel Miller, Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 1-50.10.1215/9780822386711-001Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. The University of Chicago Press, 2005.10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Mark M. Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching in History. University of California Press, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Martin Brückner, published by De Gruyter Open
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
