Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 31, 2020

Toys for Conviviality. Situating Commoning, Computation and Modelling

Selena Savic , Viktor Bedö , Michaela Büsse , Yann Martins and Shintaro Miyazaki EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Cultural Studies

Abstract

This article explores the use of agent-based modelling as a critical and playful form of engagement with cooperative housing organizations. Because of its inherent complexities vis-à-vis decision-making, commoning is a well-suited field of study to explore the potential of humanities-driven experimental design (media) research to provoke critical reflection, problem-finding and productive complication. By introducing two different agent-based models, the interdisciplinary research team discusses their experience with setting up parameters for modelling, their implications, and the possibilities and limits of employing modelling techniques as a basis for decision-making. While it shows that modelling can be helpful in detecting long-term results of decisions or testing out effects of unlikely yet challenging events, modelling might act as a discursive practice uncovering hidden assumptions inherent in the model setup and generating an increase of scientific uncertainty. The project “ThinkingToys for Commoning” thus argues for a critical modelling practice and culture, in which models act as toys for probing alternative modes of living together and exploring the constructedness of methods. In countering late forms of capitalism, the resulting situated and critical practice provides avenues for enabling more self-determined forms of governance.

Works Cited

Bedö, Viktor. “Rapid Street Game Design: Prototyping Laboratory for Urban Change.” The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, edited by Michiel de Lange, et al., Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 51–65.Search in Google Scholar

Bollier, David, and Silke Helfrich. Patterns of Commoning. Commons Strategy Group and Off the Common Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Caffentzis, George. “The Future of ‘The Commons’: Neoliberalism’s ‘Plan B’ or the Original Disaccumulation of Capital?” New Formations, vol. 69, no. 69, 2010, pp. 23–41.10.3898/NEWF.69.01.2010Search in Google Scholar

Federici, Silvia. Re-Enchanting the World. Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. PM Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Federici, Silvia. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. PM Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Flanagan, Mary. Critical Play. Radical Game Design. MIT Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Christian. ““The Utopian Internet, Computing, Communication, and Concrete Utopias: Reading William Morris, Peter Kropotkin, Ursula K. Le Guin, and P.M. in the Light of Digital Socialism.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique.Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, vol. 18, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 146–86.10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1143Search in Google Scholar

Galison, Peter. “Computer Simulation and the Trading Zone.” The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David J. Stump, Stanford University Press, 1996, pp. 118–157.Search in Google Scholar

Gandini, Alessandro. “Labour Process Theory and the Gig Economy.” Human Relations; Studies towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, vol. 72, no. 6, SAGE Publications Ltd, June 2019, pp. 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002.10.1177/0018726718790002Search in Google Scholar

Gibson-Graham, J. K., et al. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. U of Minnesota Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676064.001.0001.10.5749/minnesota/9780816676064.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century (Reprint from 1985).” Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge Chapman & Hall, 1991, pp. 149–181.Search in Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge Chapman & Hall, 1991, pp. 183–201.Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1949.Search in Google Scholar

Illich, Ivan. Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row New York, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

Kerschner, Christian, et al. “Degrowth and Technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 197, no. October, 2018, pp. 1619–36.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147Search in Google Scholar

Linebaugh, Peter. The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. University of California Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520932708.10.1525/9780520932708Search in Google Scholar

Miessen, Markus. The Nightmare of Participation: Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality. Sternberg Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Shintaro. “Take Back the Algorithms! A Media Theory of Commonistic Affordance.” Media Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, 2019, pp. 269–86.Search in Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Shintaro, and Susanna Hertrich. “Following the Elephant-Nosed Fish: Making Things More Complicated as a Form of Resistance.” NERD – New Experimental Research in Design, edited by Michael Erlhoff and Wolfgang Jonas, De Gruyter, 2018, pp. 82–96.10.1515/9783035617429-006Search in Google Scholar

Pias, Claus. “On the Epistemology of Computer Simulation.” Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, vol. 2011, no. 1, May 2011, pp. 29–54.Search in Google Scholar

P. M. Bolo’bolo (30th Anniversary Edition). Autonomedia, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Price, Henry H. Thinking and Experience. Hutchinson’s University Library, 1953.Search in Google Scholar

Savić, Selena, and Jeffrey Huang. “Research Through Design: What Does It Mean for a Design Artifact to Be Developed in the Scientific Context?” A Matter of Design, STS Italia Publishing, 12/2014, pp. 409–423.Search in Google Scholar

Stengers, Isabelle. Invention Of Modern Science. University of Minnesota Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, Elizabeth B.N, and Pieter Jan Stappers. “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design.” CoDesign, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 5–18.10.1080/15710880701875068Search in Google Scholar

Tekinbaş, Katie Salen, and Eric Zimmerman. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Tholen, Georg Christoph. “Medium/Medien.” Grundbegriffe der Medientheorie, edited by Alexander Roesler and Bernd Stiegler, Utb/ Wilhelm Fink, 2005, pp. 150–172.Search in Google Scholar

Wark, Mckenzie. Capital Is Dead: Is This Something Worse? Verso, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Winner, Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus, vol. 109, no. 1, The MIT Press, 1980, pp. 121–136.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-03
Accepted: 2020-10-27
Published Online: 2020-12-31

© 2020 Selena Savic et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 8.12.2022 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/culture-2020-0015/html
Scroll Up Arrow