Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 5, 2020

Quadratic transformation of multivariate aggregation functions

  • Prakassawat Boonmee and Santi Tasena EMAIL logo
From the journal Dependence Modeling

Abstract

In this work, we prove that quadratic transformations of aggregation functions must come from quadratic aggregation functions. We also show that this is different from quadratic transformations of (multivariate) semi-copulas and quasi-copulas. In the latter case, those two classes are actually the same and consists of convex combinations of the identity map and another fixed quadratic transformation. In other words, it is a convex set with two extreme points. This result is different from the bivariate case in which the two classes are different and both are convex with four extreme points.

MSC 2010: 62H86; 26E60

References

[1] Beliakov, G. (2009). Construction of aggregation functions from data using linear programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(1), 65–75.10.1016/j.fss.2008.07.004Search in Google Scholar

[2] Csiszár, O. and J. Fodor (2013). Threshold constructions of aggregation functions. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Computational Cybernetics, pp. 191–194.10.1109/ICCCyb.2013.6617586Search in Google Scholar

[3] Decký, M., R. Mesiar, and A. Stup¬anová (2018). Deviation-based aggregation functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 332(1), 29–36.10.1016/j.fss.2017.03.016Search in Google Scholar

[4] Durante, F., J. Fernández-Sánchez, and W. Trutschnig (2014). Solution to an open problem about a transformation on the space of copulas. Depend. Model. 2, 65–72.10.2478/demo-2014-0005Search in Google Scholar

[5] Grabisch, M., J.-L. Marichal, R. Mesiar, and E. Pap (2011). Aggregation functions: Construction methods, conjunctive, disjunctive and mixed classes. Inf. Sci. 181(1), 23–43.10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.040Search in Google Scholar

[6] Klement, E. P. and A. Kolesárová (2005). 1-lipschitz aggregation operators, quasi-copulas and copulas with given opposite diagonal. In B. Reusch (Ed.), Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications, pp. 565–571. Springer, Berlin.10.1007/3-540-31182-3_52Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kolesárová, A., G. Mayor, and R. Mesiar (2015). Quadratic constructions of copulas. Inf. Sci. 310, 69–76.10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.016Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kolesárová, A. and R. Mesiar (2015). On linear and quadratic constructions of aggregation functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 268(1), 1–14.10.1016/j.fss.2014.04.015Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kolesárová, A., R. Mesiar, and J. Kalická (2013). On a new construction of 1-lipschitz aggregation functions, quasi-copulas and copulas. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 226, 19–31.10.1016/j.fss.2013.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[10] Tasena, S. (2019a). Characterization of quadratic aggregation functions. IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. 27(4), 824–829.10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2900850Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tasena, S. (2019b). Polynomial copula transformations. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 107, 65–7810.1016/j.ijar.2019.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wisadwongsa, S. and S. Tasena (2018). Bivariate quadratic copula constructions. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 92, 1–19.10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-27
Accepted: 2020-07-23
Published Online: 2020-10-05

© 2020 Prakassawat Boonmee et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 22.3.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/demo-2020-0015/html
Scroll Up Arrow