Rudeness exposure has been shown to inhibit diagnostic performance. The effects of rudeness on challenging a handed-off diagnostic error has not been studied.
This was a randomized controlled study of attending, fellow, and resident physicians in a tertiary care pediatric ICU. Participants underwent a standardized simulation that started with the wrong diagnosis in hand-off. The hand-off was randomized to neutral vs. rude. Participants were not informed of the randomization nor diagnostic error prior to the simulation. Perspective taking questionnaires were administrated for each participant. Primary outcome was challenging diagnostic error post-simulation. Secondary outcomes included rate and frequency of diagnostic error challenge during simulation.
Among 41 simulations (16 residents, 14 fellows, and 11 attendings), the neutral group challenged the diagnostic error more than the rude group (neutral: 71%, rude: 55%, p=0.28). The magnitude of this trend was larger among resident physicians only, although not statistically significant (neutral: 50%, rude: 12.5%, p=0.11). Experience was associated with a higher percentage of challenging diagnostic error (residents: 31%, fellows: 86%, attendings: 82%, p=0.003). Experienced physicians were faster to challenge diagnostic error (p<0.0003), and experience was associated with a greater frequency of diagnostic error challenges (p<0.0001). High perspective taking scores were also associated with 1.63 times more diagnostic error challenges (p=0.007).
Experience was strongly associated with likelihood to challenge diagnostic error. Rudeness may disproportionally hinder diagnostic performance among less experienced physicians. Perspective taking merits further research in possibly reducing diagnostic error momentum.
Funding source: Children’s Hospital Los Angeles
Award Identifier / Grant number: Critical Care Medicine Department
Research funding: Interdepartmental Funds at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research was IRB approved at the location of the study, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles/University of Southern California.
2. Aspden, P, Wolcott, J, Bootman, JL, Cronenwett, LR, editors. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors. Preventing medication errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.Search in Google Scholar
3. Bates, DW, Singh, H. Two decades since to err is human: an assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Aff 2018;37:1736–43. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738.Search in Google Scholar
6. Balogh, EP, Miller, BT, Ball, JR, editors. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.10.17226/21794Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Zwaan, L, Schiff, GD, Singh, H. Advancing the research agenda for diagnostic error reduction. BMJ Qual Saf 2013:22. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001624. Suppl 2:ii52-ii7.Search in Google Scholar
8. Giardina, TD, Haskell, H, Menon, S, Hallisy, J, Southwick, FS, Sarkar, U. Learning from patients’ experiences related to diagnostic errors is essential for progress in patient safety. Health Aff 2018;37:1821–7. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0698.Search in Google Scholar
9. Custer, JW, Winters, BD, Goode, V, Robinson, KA, Yang, T, Pronovost, PJ. Diagnostic errors in the pediatric and neonatal ICU: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015;16:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000000274.Search in Google Scholar
10. Tokuda, Y, Kishida, N, Konishi, R, Koizumi, S. Cognitive error as the most frequent contributory factor in cases of medical injury: a study on verdict’s judgment among closed claims in Japan. J Hosp Med 2011;6:109–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.820.Search in Google Scholar
12. Mamede, S, van Gog, T, van den Berge, K, Rikers, RM, van Saase, JL, van Guldener, C. Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. J Am Med Assoc 2010;304:1198–203. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1276.Search in Google Scholar
14. Groopman, JE. How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2007.Search in Google Scholar
15. Rosenstein, AH, O’Daniel, M. A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008;34:464–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34058-6.Search in Google Scholar
17. Felblinger, DM. Bullying, incivility, and disruptive behaviors in the healthcare setting: identification, impact, and intervention. Front Health Serv Manag 2009;25:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01974520-200904000-00003.Search in Google Scholar
18. Lewis, PS, Malecha, A. The impact of workplace incivility on the work environment, manager skill, and productivity. J Nurs Adm 2011;41:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0b013e3182002a4c.Search in Google Scholar
19. Wallace, D. F you very much : understanding the culture of rudeness and what we can do about it. New York: A TarcherPerigee Book; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
20. Riskin, A, Bamberger, P, Erez, A, Foulk, T, Cooper, B, Peterfreund, I. Incivility and patient safety: a longitudinal study of rudeness, protocol compliance, and adverse events. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2019;45:358–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.02.002.Search in Google Scholar
21. Riskin, A, Erez, A, Foulk, TA, Kugelman, A, Gover, A, Shoris, I. The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2015;136:487–95. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1385.Search in Google Scholar
23. Katz, D, Blasius, K, Isaak, R, Lipps, J, Kushelev, M, Goldberg, A. Exposure to incivility hinders clinical performance in a simulated operative crisis. BMJ Qual Saf 2019;28:750–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009598.Search in Google Scholar
24. Cooper, WO, Spain, DA, Guillamondegui, O, Kelz, RR, Domenico, HJ, Hopkins, J. Association of coworker reports about unprofessional behavior by surgeons with surgical complications in their patients. JAMA Surg 2019;154:828–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1738.Search in Google Scholar
25. Riesenberg, LA, Leitzsch, J, Massucci, JL, Jaeger, J, Rosenfeld, JC, Patow, C. Residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med 2009;84:1775–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181bf51a6.Search in Google Scholar
26. Starmer, AJ, Spector, ND, Srivastava, R, West, DC, Rosenbluth, G, Allen, AD. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1803–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1405556.Search in Google Scholar
27. Galinsky, AD, Moskowitz, GB. Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;78:708–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.528.Search in Google Scholar
28. Batson, CD, Early, S, Salvarani, G. Perspective taking: imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1997;23:751–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008.Search in Google Scholar
30. Richards, JM, Gross, JJ. Emotion regulation and memory: the cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;79:410–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2060.Search in Google Scholar
31. Takaku, S. The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: a dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. J Soc Psychol 2001;141:494–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600567.Search in Google Scholar
32. Cheng, A, Kessler, D, Mackinnon, R, Chang, TP, Nadkarni, VM, Hunt, EA. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul (Lond) 2016;1:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0025-y.Search in Google Scholar
33. Ramachandran, D, Luo, C, Ma, TS, Clark, JWJr. Using a human cardiovascular-respiratory model to characterize cardiac tamponade and pulsus paradoxus. Theor Biol Med Model 2009;6:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-15.Search in Google Scholar
34. Davis, M. A. Multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel Doc Psychol 1980;10. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/versions?doi=10.1.1.462.7754.Search in Google Scholar
35. Foulk, T, Woolum, A, Erez, A. Catching rudeness is like catching a cold: the contagion effects of low-intensity negative behaviors. J Appl Psychol 2016;101:50–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000037.Search in Google Scholar
36. Schubert, CC, Denmark, TK, Crandall, B, Grome, A, Pappas, J. Characterizing novice-expert differences in macrocognition: an exploratory study of cognitive work in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.034.Search in Google Scholar
37. Nassetta, L, Tofil, N. Kim Y-i, eschborn S, white M. Demonstrating diagnostic error in the care of simulated pediatric inpatients. Medical Science Educator 2016;26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0316-x.Search in Google Scholar
38. Cheng, A, Auerbach, M, Hunt, EA, Chang, TP, Pusic, M, Nadkarni, V. Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics 2014;133:1091–101. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3267.Search in Google Scholar
39. Porath, C, Erez, A. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad Manag J 2007;50:1181–97. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159919.Search in Google Scholar
40. Porath, CL, Erez, A. Overlooked but not untouched: how rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2009;109:29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
41. Woolum, A, Foulk, T, Lanaj, K, Erez, A. Rude color glasses: the contaminating effects of witnessed morning rudeness on perceptions and behaviors throughout the workday. J Appl Psychol 2017;102:1658–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000247.Search in Google Scholar
42. Bar-David, S. What’s in an eye roll? It is time we explore the role of workplace incivility in healthcare. Isr J Health Policy Res 2018;7:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-018-0209-0.Search in Google Scholar
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0083).
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston