Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) December 13, 2017

Platonische Ideen als hybride Gegenstände

  • Béatrice Lienemann EMAIL logo

Abstract

Aristotle famously criticizes Plato for confusing in his conceptions of immutable, atemporal and paradigmatic Forms things of two completely different ontological types, i. e. universals and particulars. My aim, in this text, is to reveal the Platonic background of this Aristotelian criticism. Although I generally agree with Aristotle’s diagnosis of the hybrid character of Platonic Forms, I will show that it is important to distinguish between real difficulties of Plato’s conception of Forms and alleged shortcomings that might permit, nonetheless, a plausible interpretation. I start from a brief description of three essential functions which can only be adequately fulfilled by Forms according to Plato. Then, I determine the ontological status of Forms, firstly, as kinds of abstract objects (comparable to Fregean concepts), and, secondly, as paradigmatic particulars. In conclusion, I agree with Aristotle on the hybrid character of Forms, but I am less pessimistic with regard to the unintelligibility of the two different natures of Forms individually.

Literatur

Alexander von Aphrodisias (1891), In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria, hg. v. Hayduck, M., Berlin (CAG 1).10.1515/9783110807677Search in Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1960), Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues, in: Philosophical Review 69, 147–164.10.2307/2183501Search in Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1961), The Argument from Opposites in Republic V, in: Review of Metaphysics 15, 325–335.Search in Google Scholar

Aristoteles (1957), Metaphysica, hg. v. Jaeger, W., Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Aristoteles (1988), Aristoteles. ‚Metaphysik Z‘. Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, hg. v. Frede, M., u. Patzig, G., Bde. 1 u. 2, München.Search in Google Scholar

Bestor, T. W. (1978), Common Properties and Eponymy in Plato, in: Philosophical Quarterly 28, 189–207.10.2307/2218840Search in Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. (1957), Forms as Standard, in: Phronesis 2, 115–127.10.1163/156852857X00049Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, T. (2004), Phaidon. Übersetzung und Kommentar, Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar

Ferejohn, M. T. (1982), The Unity of Virtue and the Objects of Socratic Inquiry, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy 20.1, 1–21.10.1353/hph.1982.0014Search in Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1978), Knowledge and Belief in Republic V, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 60, 121–139.10.1515/agph.1978.60.2.121Search in Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1993), On ideas. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1999), Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII, in: ders. (Hg.), Plato I. Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford, 215–246.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1967a), Der Gedanke [1918], in: ders. (1967b), 342–362.Search in Google Scholar

Frege. G. (1967b), Kleine Schriften, hg. v. Angelelli, I., Darmstadt.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1967c), Über Begriff und Gegenstand [1892], in: ders. (1967b), 167–178.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1967d), Über Sinn und Bedeutung [1892], in: ders. (1967b), 143–162.Search in Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. (1956), The Third Man Again, in: Philosophical Review 65, 72–82.10.2307/2182189Search in Google Scholar

Krapinger, G. (2014), Platon: Kratylos. Griechisch-deutsch, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Künne, W. (1975), Dialektik und Ideenlehre in Platos Parmenides. Untersuchungen zu Hegels Plato-Deutung, Diss., Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Künne, W. (2003), Conceptions of Truth, Oxford.10.1093/0199241317.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Künne, W. (2004), Die ‚Gigantomachie‘ in Platons Sophistes. Versuch einer analytischen Rekonstruktion, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86, 307–321.10.1515/agph.2004.86.3.307Search in Google Scholar

Künne, W. (2006), Properties in Abundance, in: Strawson, P. F., u. Chakrabarti, A. (Hg.), Universals, Concepts and Qualities, Aldershot, 249–300.Search in Google Scholar

Künne, W. (2007), Abstrakte Gegenstände [1983], 2. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (1986), On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Lienemann, B. (2010), Die Argumente des Dritten Menschen in Platons Dialog „Parmenides“. Rekonstruktion und Kritik aus analytischer Perspektive, Göttingen (= Hypomnemata 184).10.13109/9783666252754Search in Google Scholar

Löhr, G. (1990), Das Problem des Einen und des Vielen in Platons Philebos, Göttingen (= Hypomnemata 93).10.13109/9783666251924Search in Google Scholar

McTaggart, J. (1927), The Nature of Existence 2, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Mignucci, M. (1990), Plato’s Third Man in the Parmenides, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72, 143–184.10.1515/agph.1990.72.2.143Search in Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1968), Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms, in: ders. (Hg.), Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford, 103–125.Search in Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1986a), A Proof in the Peri Ideôn [1957], in: ders. (1986b), 165–179.Search in Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1986b), Logic and Metaphysics in some Earlier Work of Aristotle [1960], in: ders. (1986c), 180–199.Search in Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1986c), Logic, Science and Dialectic. Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, hg. v. Nussbaum, M., London.Search in Google Scholar

Parry, R. D. (2001), Paradigms, Characteristics, and Forms in Plato’s Middle Dialogues, in: Apeiron 34, 1–35.10.1515/APEIRON.2001.34.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, R. (1985), Image and Reality in Plato’s Metaphysics, Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Platon (1900), Opera 1–5, hg. v. Burnet, J., Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

laton (1955), Phaedo, übers. u. komm. v. Hackforth, R., Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Platon (1995), Opera 1, hg. v. Duke, E. A., et al., Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1903), Principles of Mathematics, London.Search in Google Scholar

Strobel, B. (2007), ‚Dieses‘ und ‚So etwas‘. Zur ontologischen Klassifikation platonischer Formen, Göttingen (= Hypomnemata 168).Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1954), The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides, in: Philosophical Review 63, 319–349.10.2307/2182692Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1973a), Platonic Studies, Princeton, N. J.10.2307/j.ctv1c9hq3wSearch in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1973b), Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo [1969], in: ders. (1973a), 76–110.Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1973c), The Unity of the Virtues in the Protagoras [1971], in: ders., (1973a),221–269.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1984), Philosophische Untersuchungen, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-12-13
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2017-0071/html
Scroll to top button