Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) March 20, 2018

Moses Maimonides und Immanuel Kant – negative Theologie, Skeptizismus und die Rolle des Unendlichen

Aryeh Botwinick

Abstract

This paper argues that Kant’s argument in favor of the primacy of the categories over the world is embedded in a Maimonidean stream of theorizing. In terms of how words and concepts are configured in relation to possible entities outside of themselves, it recapitulates Maimonides’ argument concerning how to situate the human world in relation to God. The judge in Maimonides is the human being who ideally encodes in his character and personality the metaphysical stance reflected in Kant’s categories and Maimonides’ theorizing of God.

Literatur

Botwinick, A. (1997), Skepticism, Belief, and the Modern: Maimonides to Nietzsche, Ithaca, N. Y. Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, N. (1990), Weisen der Welterzeugung, übers. v. Looser, M., Frankfurt am Main. Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, W. Z. (2012), Shlomo Pines on Maimonides, Spinoza, and Kant, in: Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 20, 173–182. Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1996), Leviathan, hg. v. Klenner, H., übers. v. Schlösser, J., Hamburg. Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1781/1787), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A = 1. Aufl., B = 2. Aufl. Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, R. (2000), Maimonides’ Empire of Light. Popular Enlightenment in an Age of Belief, Chicago. Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. (1980), Götzen-Dämmerung, in: ders., Sämtliche Werke, Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, hg. v. Colli, G., u. Montinari, M., Berlin u. New York. Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. (1981), Die Grenzen des Sinns. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, übers. v. Lange, E. M., Königstein/Ts. Search in Google Scholar

Stroud, B. (1984), The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism, Oxford. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-3-20
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston