Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) March 20, 2018

Alzheimer-Erkrankungen, Autonomie und zwei Paradigmen der Pflegeethik

Klaus-Peter Rippe


Family members and professional care-givers are often confronted with challenging and self-destructive behaviours of people suffering from dementia, and it is not clear at all if these situations should be regulated by principles of autonomy or by principles of care, which consider the best interests of the patients. With reference to a thought experiment, this paper argues that it is not possible to control these situations by implementing principles of autonomy. Instead, while taking into account the patients’ capacity to consent, it is better to apply principles of care in challenging situations.


Betzler, M. (2013), Begriffe, Konzeptionen und Kontexte der Autonomie, in: dies. (Hg.), Autonomie der Person, Münster, 7–63.Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. (1983), Some Second Thoughts, in: Sartorius, R. (Hg.), Paternalism, Minneapolis, 105–111.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, P. (1991), Method in Philosophical Psychology (From the Banal to the Bizarre), in: ders., The Conception of Value, Oxford, 121–161.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, F., u. Wertheimer, A. (Hg.) (2010), The Ethics of Consent. Theory and Practice, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Rippe, K.-P. (2008), Ethik im außerhumanen Bereich, Paderborn.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-3-20
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston