Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) December 18, 2019

Umkämpfte Zeugenschaft

Der Fall Serena N. im Brennpunkt von Holocaust-Forschung, Psychoanalyse und Philosophie

  • Emmanuel Alloa EMAIL logo

Abstract

The article focuses on a controversy between historians and psychoanalysts around the testimonial value of a Holocaust survivor (Serena N.). The survivor’s account of the Auschwitz uprising includes factual exaggerations, which has led historians to discard it. Psychoanalysts on the contrary stressed that the testimony accounted for something else: the possibility of resistance in the concentration camp, which gave the inmates hope in their struggle for survival. Survivors’ testimonies, so the argument, have both an epistemological and an ethical content. While philosophy’s insistence on the epistemological dimension of testimony has long generated a disregard for this ethical dimension, it would be equally wrong to construe a pure ethicality of testimony. Testimony is, first and foremost, an entangled social practice, which has tobe acknowledged in its agonal, its aporetic and its performative implications.

Literatur

Agamben, G. (2005), Was von Auschwitz bleibt: das Archiv und der Zeuge, übers. v. Monhardt, S., Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Alloa, E. (2012), Eingefleischte Gesten: Nachleben und visuelle Zeugenschaft in Claude Lanzmanns Shoah und Rithy Panhs S21, in: Geimer, P., u. Hagner, M. (Hg.), Nachleben und Rekonstruktion: Vergangenheit im Bild, Paderborn, 207–230.Search in Google Scholar

Alloa, A. (2017a), The „Do It Yourself“ Paradigm: An Inquiry into the Historical Roots of the Neglect of Testimony, in: Early Science and Medicine 22.4, 333–360.10.1163/15733823-00224P03Search in Google Scholar

Alloa, A. (2017b), „Là où il y a preuve, il n’y a pas témoignage“. Les apories du témoin selon Jacques Derrida, in: Revue philosophique de Louvain 115.2, 289–303.Search in Google Scholar

Alloa, A., u. Kristensen, S. (2014), Un siècle génocidaire. Le parti pris du témoin, in: dies. (Hg.), Témoignage et survivance, Genf, 7–25.Search in Google Scholar

Antelme, R. (1990), Das Menschengeschlecht [1957], München u. Wien.Search in Google Scholar

Arendt, H., (1958), Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, S. (2017), ÜBER ZEUGEN im Strafverfahren, in: Däumer, M., Kalisky, A., u. Schlie, H. (Hg.), Über Zeugen. Szenarien von Zeugenschaft und ihre Akteure, München u. Paderborn, 93–110.Search in Google Scholar

Boder, D. P. (1949), I Did Not Interview the Dead, Champaign, Ill.10.1037/13245-000Search in Google Scholar

Bufacchi, V. (2006), Knowing Violence: Testimony, Trust and Truth, in: Revue internationale de philosophie 235.1, 277–291.10.3917/rip.235.0277Search in Google Scholar

Cicero, De oratore [de orat.].Search in Google Scholar

Coady, C. A. J. (2002), Testimony: a philosophical study [1992], Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Dawidowicz, L. S. (1981), The Holocaust and the Historians, Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Delbo, C. (1974), Qui rapportera ces paroles ? Tragédie en trois actes, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Gelfert, A. (2014), A Critical Introduction to Testimony, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Greif, G. (2015), Aufstand in Auschwitz: Die Revolte des jüdischen „Sonderkommandos“ am 7. Oktober 1944, übers. v. Levin, I., Köln u. Weimar.10.7788/9783412502485Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, G. (1996), The Longest Shadow: In the Aftermath of the Holocaust, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hilberg, R. (2001), Sources of Holocaust research. An analysis, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Hilberg, R. (2002), The politics of memory. The journey of a Holocaust historian, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Krämer, S. (2009), Medium, Bote, Übertragung. Kleine Metaphysik der Medialität, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Krämer, S., Schmidt S., u. Schülein, J.-G. (Hg.) (2017), Philosophie der Zeugenschaft: eine Anthologie, Münster.Search in Google Scholar

Laub, D. (1992a), Bearing Witness, or the Vicissitudes of Listening, in: ders. u. Felman, S., Testimony. Crisis of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, New York u. London, 57–74.Search in Google Scholar

Laub, D. (1992b), An Event Without a Witness. Truth, Testimony and Survival, in: ders. u. Felman, S., Testimony. Crisis of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, New York u. London, 72–92.Search in Google Scholar

Laub, D. (2000), Zeugnis ablegen, oder die Schwierigkeit des Zuhörens, in: Baer, U. (Hg.), „Niemand zeugt für den Zeugen“: Erinnerungskultur und historische Verantwortung nach der Shoah, Frankfurt am Main, 68–83.Search in Google Scholar

Laub, D. (2009), On Holocaust Testimony and Its „Reception“ Within Its Own Frame, as a Process in Its Own Right: A Response to „Between History and Psychoanalysis“ by Thomas Trezise, in: History and Memory 20.1, 127–150.10.2979/his.2009.21.1.127Search in Google Scholar

Levi, P. (1987), Opere, Turin.Search in Google Scholar

Levi, P. (1993), Die Untergegangenen und die Geretteten, München.Search in Google Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. (1989), Der Widerstreit, übers. v. Vogl, J., München.Search in Google Scholar

Mujawayo, E., u. Belhaddad, S. (2004), Survivantes: Rwanda, histoire d’un génocide, La Tour-d’Aigues.Search in Google Scholar

Mujawayo, E., u. Belhaddad, S. (2005), Ein Leben mehr: zehn Jahre nach dem Völkermord in Ruanda, übers. v. Himmelreich, J., Wuppertal.Search in Google Scholar

Nichanian, M. (2009), The Historiographic Perversion, New York.10.7312/nich14908Search in Google Scholar

Quintilian, Institutio oratoria [inst.].Search in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2008), Die Hermeneutik des Zeugnisses [1972], in: ders., An den Grenzen der Hermeneutik. Philosophische Reflexionen über die Religion, Freiburg u. München, 7–40.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. (2015), Ethik und Episteme der Zeugenschaft, Konstanz.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. (2019), Zeugenschaft zwischen Ethik und Politik, in: Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 6.1, 189–214.10.22613/zfpp/6.1.8Search in Google Scholar

Trezise, T. (2008), Between History and Psychoanalysis: A Case Study in the Reception of Holocaust Survivor Testimony, in: History and Memory 20.1, 7–47.10.2979/his.2008.20.1.7Search in Google Scholar

White, H. V. (1991), Metahistory: die historische Einbildungskraft im 19. Jahrhundert in Europa, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, J. C. (2000), Holocaust denial. Demographics, testimonies, and ideologies, Lanham, Md.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-12-18
Published in Print: 2019-12-02

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2019-0074/pdf
Scroll to top button