Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) July 18, 2020

Form und Funktion

Eine kritische Betrachtung zeitgenössischer Designästhetik

  • Julia-Constance Dissel EMAIL logo


This essay deals with the terms “form” and “function” as well as their relationship insofar as they are still used in philosophical and design-theory discourse to determine the aesthetic dimension of designed artefacts, especially of everyday objects, and often also to distinguish them from objects of art. I discuss whether our common understanding of these terms and their relationship is an appropriate instrument for such determinations. What is up for discussion here are not only conceptions of functional beauty with regard to design methodology and the philosophical discourse on aesthetics, in which form and function become thematic, but also basic concepts of philosophical aesthetics itself. It is shown that the philosophical understanding of design aesthetics and the concepts of form and function are determined by profound preliminary decisions that restrict our access to the aesthetic dimension of designed artefacts, and a conceptualisation of an initial change in thinking is proposed.


Aristoteles (1977), Metaphysik, in: ders., Hauptwerke, hg. v. Nestle, W., Stuttgart, 115–149, [metaph.].Search in Google Scholar

Beardsley, M. (1966), Aesthetics from classical Greece to the present, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Berleant, A. (1994), Beyond Disinterestedness, in: British Journal of Aesthetics 34.3, 242–254.10.4324/9781315244327-10Search in Google Scholar

Böhme, G. (2008), Die Atmosphäre, in: Andritzky, M. (Hg.), Von der guten Form zum guten Leben: 100 Jahre Werkbund, Frankfurt am Main, 107–117.Search in Google Scholar

De Clercq, R. (2005), The Aesthetic Peculiarity of Multifunctional Artefacts, in: British Journal of Aesthetics 45.4, 412–425.10.1093/aesthj/ayi051Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1988), Kunst als Erfahrung [1934], Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Dissel, J.-C. (2019a) (i. E.), Philosophische Ästhetik & Design, in: Feige, D., Arnold, F., u. Rautzenberg, M. (Hg.), Philosophie des Designs, Schriftenreihe des Weißenhof-Instituts zur Architektur- und Designtheorie, 307–326.10.14361/9783839441879-016Search in Google Scholar

Dissel, J.-C. (2019b), Mit allen Sinnen – Perspectives of Aesthetics, in: Form 284, 97–101.Search in Google Scholar

Dorschel, A. (2003), Gestaltung – Zur Ästhetik des Brauchbaren, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Feige, M. (2018), Design. Eine philosophische Analyse, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Fingerhut, J., Hufendiek, R., u. Wild, M. (2017), Philosophie der Verkörperung, Berlin.10.1515/9783110561913-024Search in Google Scholar

Forsey, J. (2013), Aesthetics of Design, Oxford u. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199964369.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haapala, Arto (2005), On the Aesthetics of the Everyday: Familiarity, Strangeness, and the Meaning of Place, in: Light, A., u. Smith, J. (Hg.), The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, New York, 39–55.Search in Google Scholar

Houkes, W., u. Vermaas, P. (2010), Technical Functions: On the Use and Design of Artifacts, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-90-481-3900-2Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1974), Kritik der Urteilskraft [1790] (= Werkausgabe 10), hg. v. Weischedel, W., Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Leddy, T. (2005), The Nature of Everyday Aesthetics, in: Light, A., u. Smith, J. (Hg.), The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Liessmann, K. P. (2009), Schönheit, Wien.10.36198/9783838530482Search in Google Scholar

Longy, F. (2009), How biological, cultural and intended functions combine, in: Krohs U., u. Kroes P. (Hg.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds, Cambridge, 51–67.10.7551/mitpress/9780262113212.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, R. (1984), Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, G. (2016), The Philosophy of Design, Cambridge u. Malden, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, G., u. Carlson, A. (2008), Functional Beauty, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205240.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Preston, B. (2013), A Philosophy of Material Culture: Action, Function, and Mind, New York.10.4324/9780203069844Search in Google Scholar

Preston, B. (2009), Philosophical Theories of Artefact Function, in: Meijers, A., Gabbay, D., u. Woods, J., Philosophy of Technology and Engeneering Science, Oxford, 213–233.10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50013-6Search in Google Scholar

Preston, B. (2003), Of Marigold Beer: A Reply to Vermaas and Houkes, in: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54, 601–612.10.1093/bjps/54.4.601Search in Google Scholar

Preston, B. (1998), Why is a Wing like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function, in: Journal of Philosophy 115, 215–254.10.2307/2564689Search in Google Scholar

Pye, D. (1978), The Nature and Aesthetics of Design, Bethel, Conn.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Y. (2001), Everyday Aesthetics, in: Philosophy and Literature 25.1, 87–95.10.1353/phl.2001.0018Search in Google Scholar

Scheele, M. (2005), The Proper Use of Artifacts. A philosophical Theory of the Constitution of Artefact Functions (Simon Stevin Series in the Philosophy of Technology).Search in Google Scholar

Scheele, M. (2006), Function and use of technical artifacts: social conditions of function ascription, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37, 23–36.10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Scruton, R. (1979), The Aesthetics of Architecture, Princeton, N. J.Search in Google Scholar

Shusterman, R. (2005), Leibliche Erfahrung in Kunst und Lebensstil (= Philosophische Anthropologie 3), Berlin.10.1524/9783050047041Search in Google Scholar

Sparke, P. (2004), An Introduction in Design and Culture: 1900 to the Present, London.Search in Google Scholar

Stolnitz, J. (1960), Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism: A Critical Introduction, Boston, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

Tatarkiewicz, W. (2003), Geschichte der sechs Begriffe. Kunst, Schönheit, Form, Kreativität, Mimesis, Ästhetisches Erlebnis, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Tatarkiewicz, W. (1972), The Great Theory of Beauty and its Decline, in: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31.2, 165–180.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac31.2.0165Search in Google Scholar

Walton, K. (1979), Categories of Art, in: Philosophical Review 79, 334–367.10.4324/9781315303673-102Search in Google Scholar

Wicks, R. (1997), Dependent Beauty as the appreciation of teleological style, in: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55.4, 387–400.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac55.4.0387Search in Google Scholar

Wicks, R. (1999), Can tattooed Faces be Beautiful? Limits on the restriction of forms in dependent beauty, in: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57.3, 361–363.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac57.3.0361Search in Google Scholar

Xenophon (1956), Memorabilien, in: Die Sokratischen Schriften, hg. v. Bux, E., Stuttgart, 47–188 [mem.].Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-07-18
Published in Print: 2020-05-05

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button