Abstract
This paper explores the educator experience and sense-making of design thinking pedagogy in the higher education context. Design thinking has become a pedagogical phenomenon in higher education due to its widespread relevance across many disciplines. Some studies discuss design thinking as a pedagogy in the educational context; however, there is a lack of empirical research to understand the educator perspective on design thinking pedagogy. Three design thinking educators who have had more than fifteen years of teaching experience were interviewed to explore their experiences. The data from these individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews were analysed employing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). One super-ordinate theme; capability building for everyone, and four subordinate themes; developing a participatory approach towards world issues; developing an open, explorative attitude; developing creative ability; and developing an ethical mindset were identified. From these findings, the paper argues that design thinking educators have the basis for a pedagogical rationale that transcends disciplinary boundaries and provides common ground for collaboration and on-going development of design thinking pedagogy as an emerging field in education.
References
Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2010). Basic Design 08: Design Thinking. Lausanne 6, Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, N., Adam, R., Petray, T., Taylor, P., Otto, T., Melles, G., … Wright, N. (2014). Design thinking frameworks as transformative cross-disciplinary pedagogy: Final Report. Sydney.Search in Google Scholar
Bainger, L. (2011). Giving teachers a voice: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in music education research. Music Education Research and Innovation, 14(1), 32–39.Search in Google Scholar
Beligatamulla, G. (2018). Design thinking for business and entrepreneurship: accelerating innovation in higher education in Sri Lanka. In International Conference on Business Research (pp. 29–38). Moratuwa: University of Moratuwa,. https://doi.org/10.31705/ICBR.2018.510.31705/ICBR.2018.5Search in Google Scholar
Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., & Franz, J. (2018). Does It Matter? Value of Reporting Both Successes and Failures of ‘Design Thinking’ in Higher Education. In The Twelfth International Conference on Design Principles & Practices (p. Virtual Lightning Talk). Barcelona: Common Ground Research Networks.Search in Google Scholar
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/151163710.2307/1511637Search in Google Scholar
Camacho, M. (2016). In Conversation David Kelley: From Design to Design Thinking at Stanford and IDEO. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.00910.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.009Search in Google Scholar
Cassim, F. (2013). Hands On, Hearts On, Minds On: Design Thinking within an Education Context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01752.x10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01752.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cerbone, D. R. (2015). Making Sense of Phenomenological Sense-Making: On Moore on Husserl. Philosophical Topics, 43(1&2), 1–16.10.5840/philtopics2015431/217Search in Google Scholar
Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 604–623.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Costa, K. (2017). Apply design thinking in higher education. Student Affairs Today, 20(5), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/say.3036510.1002/say.30365Search in Google Scholar
Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and Acting Like a Designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. San Francisco: WISE and IDEO.Search in Google Scholar
Donar, A. (2011). Thinking Design and Pedagogy: An Examination of Five Canadian Post-Secondary Courses in Design Thinking. Canadian Review of Art Education, 38(1), 84–102.Search in Google Scholar
Dong, A. (2008). The Policy of Design: A Capabilities Approach. Design Issues, 24(4), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.4.7610.1162/desi.2008.24.4.76Search in Google Scholar
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(January), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2006.167907810.1109/EMR.2006.1679078Search in Google Scholar
Elliott, K., & Lodge, J. M. (2017). Engaging University Teachers in Design Thinking. In R. James, S. French, & P. Kelly (Eds.), Visions for Australian Tertiary Education (pp. 55–66). Melbourne: Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.Search in Google Scholar
Franz, J. (2019). Designing ‘Space’ for Student Wellbeing as Flourishing. In H. Hughes, J. Franz, & J. Willis (Eds.), School Spaces for Student Wellbeing and Learning (pp. 261–279). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6092-3_1410.1007/978-981-13-6092-3_14Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. G., Crow, M. M., & Anderson, D. (2018). Design Thinking for Higher Education. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(1), 36–41.Search in Google Scholar
Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (Eds.). (2017). Taking Design Thinking to School: How the Technology of Design Can Transform Teachers, Learners, and Classrooms. New York and London: Taylor and Francis.Search in Google Scholar
Grande, J. (2014). The Capability approach and design towards a practical approach based on lessons from Ethiopia. In DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations, University of Twente, The Netherlands (pp. 432–436).Search in Google Scholar
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, N., & Buining, F. (2011). Enriching Problem-based Learning through Design Thinking. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New Approaches to Problem-based Learning: Revitalising Your Practice in Higher Education (pp. 158–170). New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar
Kirn, A., Huff, J. L., Godwin, A., Ross, M., & Cass, C. (2019). Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.156327010.1080/14780887.2018.1563270Search in Google Scholar
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Association Press. Retrieved from http://libcat.library.qut.edu.au/record=b1344069&searchscope=8Search in Google Scholar
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-310.1007/978-981-287-444-3Search in Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (Second edition). Upper Saddle River: New Jersey Pearson Education Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Koria, M. (2009). On Innovation and Capability: A Holistic View Philosophy of Management (Vol. 7). Retrieved from https://link-springer-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/content/pdf/10.5840%2Fpom20097230.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Koria, M. (2015). Four Dimensions in Learning Design Thinking: Capabilities, Constraints, Collaboration, and the Diffusion of Ideas. Synnyt/Origins, Finnish Studies in Art Education, Special Is(2), 15–26.10.54916/rae.118809Search in Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Calif: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Larkin, M., Shaw, R., & Flowers, P. (2018). Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.154065510.1080/14780887.2018.1540655Search in Google Scholar
Leifer, L., & Meinel, C. (2015). Manifesto: Design thinking becomes foundational. In Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_110.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_1Search in Google Scholar
Leong, B. D., & Clark, H. (2003). Culture-Based Knowledge Towards New Design Thinking and Practice-A Dialogue: Benny Ding Leong in conversation with Hazel Clark. Design Issues, 19(3), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360376829083810.1162/074793603768290838Search in Google Scholar
Liedtka, J., Salzman, R., & Azer, D. (2017). Design thinking for the greater good: Innovation in the social sector. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/lied17952Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. (2013). Embedded creativity: Teaching design thinking via distance education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9214-810.1007/s10798-012-9214-8Search in Google Scholar
Lockard, E. S., & Hargis, J. (2017). Andragogical Design Thinking: A Transition to Anarchy in and Beyond the Classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 10(3).Search in Google Scholar
Luka, I. (2014). Design Thinking in Pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20142.63.7410.15503/jecs20142.63.74Search in Google Scholar
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020305369010.4324/9780203053690Search in Google Scholar
ME310 Stanford University. (2010). ME310 Design Innovation at Stanford University. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from https://web.stanford.edu/group/me310/me310_2016/about.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking Research. Design Thinking: Understand, Improve, Apply. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387667-6.00013-010.1016/B978-0-12-387667-6.00013-0Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H. E., & Warman, G. (2015). Using Design Thinking in Higher Education. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/1/using-design-thinking-in-higher-educationSearch in Google Scholar
Mortimore, P. (Ed.). (1999). Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London : Chapman.10.4135/9781446219454Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01053.x10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01053.xSearch in Google Scholar
Oxman, R. (1996). Cognition and design. Design Studies, 17(4), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)90000-910.1016/S0142-694X(96)90000-9Search in Google Scholar
Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00033-410.1016/S0142-694X(03)00033-4Search in Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Pipere, A., & Micule, I. (2014). Mathematical Identity for a Sustainable Future: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 5–31.10.2478/jtes-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2015). Design thinking research: Making design thinking foundational. Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-110.1007/978-3-319-19641-1Search in Google Scholar
Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies, 19(4), 389–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00015-510.1016/S0142-694X(98)00015-5Search in Google Scholar
Reid, K., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2005). Exploring lived experience. Psychologist, 18(1), 20–23.Search in Google Scholar
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050841037215110.1177/1350508410372151Search in Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.51065910.1080/17437199.2010.510659Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (2018). Participants and researchers searching for meaning: conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.154064810.1080/14780887.2018.1540648Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method, and research. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2010). Intepretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008a). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008b). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (pp. 229–254). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470776278.ch1010.1002/9780470776278.ch10Search in Google Scholar
Stables, K. (2013). Designerly Well-being: Implications for pedagogy that develops design capability. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 19(1).Search in Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (1998). Capability and quality in higher education. Kogan Page.Search in Google Scholar
Strickfaden, M., & Heylighen, A. (2010). Cultural Capital: A Thesaurus for Teaching Design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01653.x10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01653.xSearch in Google Scholar
Taheri, M., Unterholzer, T., & Meinel, C. (2016). Design Thinking At Scale: A Report on Best Practices of Online Courses. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research: Taking Breakthrough Innovation Home (pp. 217–235). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40382-3_1310.1007/978-3-319-40382-3_13Search in Google Scholar
Takeda, K. (2013). Design Thinking for Future Schools. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal, 49(4), 455–462.Search in Google Scholar
Tovey, M. (Ed.). (2015). Design Pedagogy: Developments in Art and Design Education. Surrey and Burlington: Gower Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Tschimmel, K., Loyens, D., Soares, J., & Oraviita, T. (2017). D-Think Toolkit: Design Thinking Applied to Education and Training. ERASMUS+ and KA2 Strategic Partnerships Authors.Search in Google Scholar
von Thienen, J., Ney, S., & Meinel, C. (2019). Estimator Socialization in Design Thinking: The Dynamic Process of Learning How to Judge Creative Work. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity, Creativity Theory and Action in Education 4 (pp. 67–99). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_510.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_5Search in Google Scholar
von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design Thinking in Higher Education: How Students become Dedicated Creative Problem Solvers. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Creative Problem-Solving Skill Development in Higher Education (pp. 306–328). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0643-0.ch01410.4018/978-1-5225-0643-0.ch014Search in Google Scholar
Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional Education, Capabilities and the Public Good: the role of universities in promoting human development. London: Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203083895Search in Google Scholar
Walker, M., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (Eds.). (2017). Socially just pedagogies, capabilities and quality in higher education: Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/series/14625Search in Google Scholar
Williams, W. A., & Rieger, J. (2015). A Design History of Design : Complexity, Criticality, and Cultural Competence. Design Studies in Canada (and Beyond), 40(2), 15–21. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.7202/1035392ar10.7202/1035392arSearch in Google Scholar
Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design Thinking pedagogy: the Educational Design Ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.110821410.1080/14703297.2015.1108214Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Gnanaharsha Beligatamulla et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.