Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 23, 2019

Making Pedagogic Sense of Design Thinking in the Higher Education Context

  • Gnanaharsha Beligatamulla EMAIL logo , Janice Rieger , Jill Franz and Megan Strickfaden
From the journal Open Education Studies


This paper explores the educator experience and sense-making of design thinking pedagogy in the higher education context. Design thinking has become a pedagogical phenomenon in higher education due to its widespread relevance across many disciplines. Some studies discuss design thinking as a pedagogy in the educational context; however, there is a lack of empirical research to understand the educator perspective on design thinking pedagogy. Three design thinking educators who have had more than fifteen years of teaching experience were interviewed to explore their experiences. The data from these individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews were analysed employing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). One super-ordinate theme; capability building for everyone, and four subordinate themes; developing a participatory approach towards world issues; developing an open, explorative attitude; developing creative ability; and developing an ethical mindset were identified. From these findings, the paper argues that design thinking educators have the basis for a pedagogical rationale that transcends disciplinary boundaries and provides common ground for collaboration and on-going development of design thinking pedagogy as an emerging field in education.


Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2010). Basic Design 08: Design Thinking. Lausanne 6, Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, N., Adam, R., Petray, T., Taylor, P., Otto, T., Melles, G., … Wright, N. (2014). Design thinking frameworks as transformative cross-disciplinary pedagogy: Final Report. Sydney.Search in Google Scholar

Bainger, L. (2011). Giving teachers a voice: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in music education research. Music Education Research and Innovation, 14(1), 32–39.Search in Google Scholar

Beligatamulla, G. (2018). Design thinking for business and entrepreneurship: accelerating innovation in higher education in Sri Lanka. In International Conference on Business Research (pp. 29–38). Moratuwa: University of Moratuwa,. in Google Scholar

Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., & Franz, J. (2018). Does It Matter? Value of Reporting Both Successes and Failures of ‘Design Thinking’ in Higher Education. In The Twelfth International Conference on Design Principles & Practices (p. Virtual Lightning Talk). Barcelona: Common Ground Research Networks.Search in Google Scholar

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. in Google Scholar

Camacho, M. (2016). In Conversation David Kelley: From Design to Design Thinking at Stanford and IDEO. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(1), 88–101. in Google Scholar

Cassim, F. (2013). Hands On, Hearts On, Minds On: Design Thinking within an Education Context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202. in Google Scholar

Cerbone, D. R. (2015). Making Sense of Phenomenological Sense-Making: On Moore on Husserl. Philosophical Topics, 43(1&2), 1–16.10.5840/philtopics2015431/217Search in Google Scholar

Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 604–623.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Costa, K. (2017). Apply design thinking in higher education. Student Affairs Today, 20(5), 6–7. in Google Scholar

Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and Acting Like a Designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. San Francisco: WISE and IDEO.Search in Google Scholar

Donar, A. (2011). Thinking Design and Pedagogy: An Examination of Five Canadian Post-Secondary Courses in Design Thinking. Canadian Review of Art Education, 38(1), 84–102.Search in Google Scholar

Dong, A. (2008). The Policy of Design: A Capabilities Approach. Design Issues, 24(4), 76–87. in Google Scholar

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(January), 103–120. in Google Scholar

Elliott, K., & Lodge, J. M. (2017). Engaging University Teachers in Design Thinking. In R. James, S. French, & P. Kelly (Eds.), Visions for Australian Tertiary Education (pp. 55–66). Melbourne: Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.Search in Google Scholar

Franz, J. (2019). Designing ‘Space’ for Student Wellbeing as Flourishing. In H. Hughes, J. Franz, & J. Willis (Eds.), School Spaces for Student Wellbeing and Learning (pp. 261–279). Singapore: Springer. in Google Scholar

Gilbert, C. G., Crow, M. M., & Anderson, D. (2018). Design Thinking for Higher Education. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(1), 36–41.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (Eds.). (2017). Taking Design Thinking to School: How the Technology of Design Can Transform Teachers, Learners, and Classrooms. New York and London: Taylor and Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Grande, J. (2014). The Capability approach and design towards a practical approach based on lessons from Ethiopia. In DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations, University of Twente, The Netherlands (pp. 432–436).Search in Google Scholar

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, N., & Buining, F. (2011). Enriching Problem-based Learning through Design Thinking. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New Approaches to Problem-based Learning: Revitalising Your Practice in Higher Education (pp. 158–170). New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Kirn, A., Huff, J. L., Godwin, A., Ross, M., & Cass, C. (2019). Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–20. in Google Scholar

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Association Press. Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning. Singapore: Springer. in Google Scholar

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (Second edition). Upper Saddle River: New Jersey Pearson Education Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Koria, M. (2009). On Innovation and Capability: A Holistic View Philosophy of Management (Vol. 7). Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Koria, M. (2015). Four Dimensions in Learning Design Thinking: Capabilities, Constraints, Collaboration, and the Diffusion of Ideas. Synnyt/Origins, Finnish Studies in Art Education, Special Is(2), 15–26.10.54916/rae.118809Search in Google Scholar

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Calif: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Larkin, M., Shaw, R., & Flowers, P. (2018). Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–17. in Google Scholar

Leifer, L., & Meinel, C. (2015). Manifesto: Design thinking becomes foundational. In Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational. in Google Scholar

Leong, B. D., & Clark, H. (2003). Culture-Based Knowledge Towards New Design Thinking and Practice-A Dialogue: Benny Ding Leong in conversation with Hazel Clark. Design Issues, 19(3), 48–58. in Google Scholar

Liedtka, J., Salzman, R., & Azer, D. (2017). Design thinking for the greater good: Innovation in the social sector. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/lied17952Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, P. (2013). Embedded creativity: Teaching design thinking via distance education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 749–765. in Google Scholar

Lockard, E. S., & Hargis, J. (2017). Andragogical Design Thinking: A Transition to Anarchy in and Beyond the Classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 10(3).Search in Google Scholar

Luka, I. (2014). Design Thinking in Pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 63–74. in Google Scholar

Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Routledge. in Google Scholar

ME310 Stanford University. (2010). ME310 Design Innovation at Stanford University. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from in Google Scholar

Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking Research. Design Thinking: Understand, Improve, Apply. in Google Scholar

Morris, H. E., & Warman, G. (2015). Using Design Thinking in Higher Education. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from in Google Scholar

Mortimore, P. (Ed.). (1999). Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London : Chapman.10.4135/9781446219454Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press. in Google Scholar

Oxman, R. (1996). Cognition and design. Design Studies, 17(4), 337–340. in Google Scholar

Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91. in Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pipere, A., & Micule, I. (2014). Mathematical Identity for a Sustainable Future: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 5–31.10.2478/jtes-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2015). Design thinking research: Making design thinking foundational. Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational. in Google Scholar

Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies, 19(4), 389–430. in Google Scholar

Reid, K., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2005). Exploring lived experience. Psychologist, 18(1), 20–23.Search in Google Scholar

Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44. in Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A. (2018). Participants and researchers searching for meaning: conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–16. in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method, and research. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2010). Intepretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008a). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008b). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (pp. 229–254). Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Stables, K. (2013). Designerly Well-being: Implications for pedagogy that develops design capability. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 19(1).Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (1998). Capability and quality in higher education. Kogan Page.Search in Google Scholar

Strickfaden, M., & Heylighen, A. (2010). Cultural Capital: A Thesaurus for Teaching Design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 121–133. in Google Scholar

Taheri, M., Unterholzer, T., & Meinel, C. (2016). Design Thinking At Scale: A Report on Best Practices of Online Courses. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research: Taking Breakthrough Innovation Home (pp. 217–235). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. in Google Scholar

Takeda, K. (2013). Design Thinking for Future Schools. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal, 49(4), 455–462.Search in Google Scholar

Tovey, M. (Ed.). (2015). Design Pedagogy: Developments in Art and Design Education. Surrey and Burlington: Gower Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Tschimmel, K., Loyens, D., Soares, J., & Oraviita, T. (2017). D-Think Toolkit: Design Thinking Applied to Education and Training. ERASMUS+ and KA2 Strategic Partnerships Authors.Search in Google Scholar

von Thienen, J., Ney, S., & Meinel, C. (2019). Estimator Socialization in Design Thinking: The Dynamic Process of Learning How to Judge Creative Work. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity, Creativity Theory and Action in Education 4 (pp. 67–99). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. in Google Scholar

von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design Thinking in Higher Education: How Students become Dedicated Creative Problem Solvers. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Creative Problem-Solving Skill Development in Higher Education (pp. 306–328). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. in Google Scholar

Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional Education, Capabilities and the Public Good: the role of universities in promoting human development. London: Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203083895Search in Google Scholar

Walker, M., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (Eds.). (2017). Socially just pedagogies, capabilities and quality in higher education: Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Williams, W. A., & Rieger, J. (2015). A Design History of Design : Complexity, Criticality, and Cultural Competence. Design Studies in Canada (and Beyond), 40(2), 15–21. in Google Scholar

Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design Thinking pedagogy: the Educational Design Ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-01
Accepted: 2019-07-12
Published Online: 2019-10-23

© 2019 Gnanaharsha Beligatamulla et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 30.5.2023 from
Scroll to top button