Abstract
Engineer, innovators, and designers play a critical role in the economy by addressing pressing problems and creating solutions that are new and innovative. It is a role that involves technical skills but also requires curiosity, an ability to connect pieces of knowledge to discover solutions, and a focus on value creation – which are all characteristic of the entrepreneurial mindset. There are many different design-focused frameworks that can be used to enhance the entrepreneurial mindset; this study focuses on four of them: systems thinking, design thinking, the value proposition canvas, and the business model canvas. The purpose of this paper is to highlight a new approach to developing the entrepreneurial mindset that goes beyond the proverbial “checking boxes” to providing an approach for demonstrating the integration of doing (artifact development) and thinking (reflection). This innovative and experimental approach offers two unique attributes. First, it is a scaffold in that instruction of each of the four modules builds on the other, further enhancing and grounding the learning experience. Second, students are required to continuously reflect on the process. This encourages students to think about learning in a holistic manner, allowing the ability to connect classroom learning with specific current and future utility. The findings suggest that students were able to recognize why the design-focused frameworks and learning activities were important outside of the classroom, particularly in relation to workforce preparation and securing future employment.
References
Andersen, A. (2001). Implementation of engineering product design using international student teamwork—to comply with future needs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 179-186.10.1080/03043790110034438Search in Google Scholar
Autrey, J. L., Sieber, J., Siddique, Z., & Mistree, F. (2018). Leveraging Self-Assessment to Encourage Learning Through Reflection on Doing. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 708-722.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, R., & Szabo, Z. (2007). Assessing engineering design process knowledge. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 508.Search in Google Scholar
Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California management review, 50(1), 25-56.10.2307/41166415Search in Google Scholar
Behm, M., Culvenor, J., & Dixon, G. (2014). Development of safe design thinking among engineering students. Safety Science, 63(C), 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.01810.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.018Search in Google Scholar
Beiler, M. R. O. (2015). Integrating innovation and entrepreneurship principles into the civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3).Search in Google Scholar
Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. (2018). Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-61412-0Search in Google Scholar
Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. (2019). Applying Authentic Learning through Cultivation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Engineering Classroom. Education Sciences, 9(1), 7.10.3390/educsci9010007Search in Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation New York, NY: Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29Search in Google Scholar
Brush, C., Neck, H., & Greene, P. (2015). A practice-based approach to entrepreneurship education. Evolving Entrepreneurial Education: Innovation in the Babson Classroom, 35.Search in Google Scholar
Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education. National Academy of Engineering - The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, R. M., & Mahboobin, A. (2018). Scaffolding to Support Problem-Solving Performance in a Bioengineering Lab—A Case Study. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 61(2), 109-118.10.1109/TE.2017.2755601Search in Google Scholar
Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: researchers’ views: University of York York.Search in Google Scholar
Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791-820.10.1002/tea.1032Search in Google Scholar
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.10.5465/amle.2006.23473212Search in Google Scholar
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.xSearch in Google Scholar
Eppes, T. A., Milanovic, I., & Sweitzer, H. F. (2012). Strengthening Capstone Skills in STEM Programs. Innovative Higher Education, 37(1), 3-10.10.1007/s10755-011-9181-0Search in Google Scholar
Estell, J. K., & Hurtig, J. (2006). Using rubrics for the assessment of senior design projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Excellence in Education.Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, S., & Justwan, F. (2018). Scaffolding Assignments and Activities for Undergraduate Research Methods. Journal of Political Science Education, 14(1), 63-71.10.1080/15512169.2017.1367301Search in Google Scholar
García-Rodríguez, F. J., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., & Ruiz-Rosa, I. (2017). The Business Model Approach in Entrepreneurship Education: Impact on Undergraduates′ Enterprise Potential. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 11-17.10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n3p11Search in Google Scholar
Gerhart, A. L., Carpenter, D. D., Fletcher, R. W., & Meyer, E. G. (2014). Combining discipline-specific introduction to engineering courses into a single multi-discipline course to foster the entrepreneurial mindset with entrepreneurially minded learning. In.Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, L. A., Gross, D. S., & Kreutz, K. J. (2018). Developing undergraduate students’ systems thinking skills with an InTeGrate module. Journal of Geoscience Education, 1-16. doi:10.1080/10899995.2018.152946910.1080/10899995.2018.1529469Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. E., & Somerville, M. (2014). A whole new engineer.Search in Google Scholar
Guerra, R. C. C., Smith, K. A., McKenna, A. F., Swan, C., Korte, R., Jordan, S., ... MacNeal, R. (2014). Innovation corps for learning: Evidence-based entrepreneurship to improve STEM education. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.10.1109/FIE.2014.7044484Search in Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2002). Cultivating a global mindset. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 116-126.10.5465/ame.2002.6640211Search in Google Scholar
Hanson, J. H., & Williams, J. M. (2008). Using writing assignments to improve self-assessment and communication skills in an engineering statics course. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 515-529.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00997.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hathcock, S., Dickerson, D., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM Activity. Research in science education, 45(5), 727-748. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9437-710.1007/s11165-014-9437-7Search in Google Scholar
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of business venturing, 25(2), 217-229.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., Allen, R. D., & Mullineux, G. (2002). A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. International journal of information management, 22(4), 263-280.10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00012-9Search in Google Scholar
Hiller Connell, K. Y., Remington, S. M., & Armstrong, C. M. (2012). Assessing systems thinking skills in two undergraduate sustainability courses: a comparison of teaching strategies. Journal of Sustainability Education, 3.Search in Google Scholar
Hoveskog, M., Halila, F., & Danilovic, M. (2015). Early Phases of Business Model Innovation: An Ideation Experience Workshop in the Classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(2), 177-195. doi:10.1111/dsji.1206110.1111/dsji.12061Search in Google Scholar
Kline, W. A., Hixson, C. A., Mason, T. W., Brackin, P., Bunch, R. M., Dee, K. C., & Livesay, G. A. (2014). The Innovation Canvas in entrepreneurship education: Integrating themes of design, value, and market success. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 80-99.10.7814/jeen5v5p6hkSearch in Google Scholar
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In Design Thinking for Education (pp. 1-15): Springer.10.1007/978-981-287-444-3Search in Google Scholar
Kudrowitz, B. M., & Wallace, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(2), 120-139.10.1080/09544828.2012.676633Search in Google Scholar
Leschke, J. (2013). Business model mapping: Application and experience in an introduction to entrepreneurship course. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16, 77-92.Search in Google Scholar
Liening, A., Geiger, J.-M., Kriedel, R., & Wagner, W. (2016). Complexity and Entrepreneurship: Modeling the Process of Entrepreneurship Education with the Theory of Synergetics. In E. S. C. Berger & A. Kuckertz (Eds.), Complexity in Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Technology Research: Applications of Emergent and Neglected Methods (pp. 93-115). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284): Harvard Business Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeal, K. S., Libarkin, J. C., Ledley, T. S., Bardar, E., Haddad, N., Ellins, K., & Dutta, S. (2014). The Role of Research in Online Curriculum Development: The Case of EarthLabs Climate Change and Earth System Modules. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 560-577. doi:10.5408/13-060.110.5408/13-060.1Search in Google Scholar
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.Search in Google Scholar
Patel, S., & Mehta, K. (2017). Systems, Design, and Entrepreneurial Thinking: Comparative Frameworks. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(5), 515-533. doi:10.1007/s11213-016-9404-510.1007/s11213-016-9404-5Search in Google Scholar
Ranger, B. J., & Mantzavinou, A. (2018). Design thinking in development engineering education: A case study on creating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world. Development Engineering, 3, 166-174. doi:10.1016/j.deveng.2018.06.00110.1016/j.deveng.2018.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.10.3102/0034654312457429Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012a). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012b). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in Education. Design and Technology Education, 17(3), 8-19.Search in Google Scholar
Seddon, J., & Caulkin, S. (2007). Systems thinking, lean production and action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 4(1), 9-24.10.1080/14767330701231438Search in Google Scholar
Seidel, V. P., & Fixson, S. K. (2013). Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 19-33.10.1111/jpim.12061Search in Google Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.10.5465/amr.2000.2791611Search in Google Scholar
Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Boss.Search in Google Scholar
Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding Critical Thinking in the Zone of Proximal Development. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(3), 317-328. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.48923710.1080/07294360.2010.489237Search in Google Scholar
Welker, A. L., Sample-Lord, K. M., & Yost, J. R. (2017). Weaving entrepreneurially minded learning throughout a civil engineering curriculum. In (Vol. 2017-).10.18260/1-2--29112Search in Google Scholar
Wheadon, J., & Duval-Couetil, N. (2016). Elements of entrepreneurially minded learning: KEEN white paper. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship(7(3)), 17-25.Search in Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Lisa Bosman, published by De Gruyter Open
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
