Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 18, 2022

A review of research with co-design methods in health education

  • Francisco Iniesto EMAIL logo , Koula Charitonos and Allison Littlejohn
From the journal Open Education Studies

Abstract

Studies using co-design methods require the meaningful involvement of stakeholders in creating new knowledge and harnessing, mobilising, and transferring existing knowledge to support comprehensive and long-term solutions. In the health sector, co-design methodology is seen as a way of supporting and engaging local communities in critical decision-making about their health. However, little is known about which specific co-design methods have been adopted, used, and implemented within health education contexts. To address this gap, this paper presents a literature review of co-design methods used to design and implement health education interventions. This rapid evidence assessment (REA) was carried out by identifying 53 papers categorised into four themes: methods, stages, stakeholders, and outcomes. We examined specific co-design methods used in health education stages to support the involvement of stakeholders, second, we reviewed the outcomes of the application of these methods. Based on the review findings, the paper reflects two areas: first, the review shows that there are a wide number of co-design methods being used to support stakeholder collaboration to design health care services as products and processes. Second, there is no clear way co-design methods are evaluated for their outcomes. This review of literature contributes an evidence base to support the future development and use of co-design in health contexts by organising relevant literature into coherent themes in ways that can inform future research.

References

Adams, R., & Lenton, K. (2017). Engaging colleagues in active learning pedagogies through mentoring and co-design. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. 104522D). Optical Society of America.10.1117/12.2266663Search in Google Scholar

Akpo, E., Crane, T. A., Vissoh, P. V., & Tossou, R. C. (2015). Co-production of knowledge in multi-stakeholder processes: Analysing joint experimentation as social learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(4), 369-388.10.1080/1389224X.2014.939201Search in Google Scholar

Alhumaidan, H., Lo, K. P. Y., & Selby, A. (2015). Co-design of augmented reality book for collaborative learning experience in primary education. In 2015 SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) (pp. 427-430). IEEE10.1109/IntelliSys.2015.7361175Search in Google Scholar

Alvarado, D. (2012). Supporting non-formal learning through co-design of social games with children. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 347-350). ACM.10.1145/2307096.2307164Search in Google Scholar

Barbera, E., Garcia, I., & Fuertes-Alpiste, M. (2017). A co-design process microanalysis: Stages and facilitators of an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced learning scenario. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6).10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2805Search in Google Scholar

Barends, E., Rousseau, D.M., & Briner, R.B. (Eds.) (2017). CEBMa Guideline for rapid evidence assessments in management and organizations, Version 1.0. Amsterdam, NL: Center for Evidence Based Management. Available at https://cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/CEBMa-REA-Guideline.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Bevan Jones, R., Stallard, P., Agha, S. S., Rice, S., Werner-Seidler, A., Stasiak, K., ... & Merry, S. (2020). Practitioner review: co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(8), 928-940.10.1111/jcpp.13258Search in Google Scholar

Bødker, S. (1996). Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human–computer interaction, 11(3), 215-236.10.1207/s15327051hci1103_2Search in Google Scholar

Bødker, S., & Kyng, M. (2018). Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 25(1), 1-31.10.1145/3152421Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. London: new economics foundation, 56, 18. Available at https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/312ac8ce93a00d5973_3im6i6t0e.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In Co-Production and Co-Creation (pp. 9-17). Routledge.10.4324/9781315204956-2Search in Google Scholar

Calvo, M., Sclater, M., & Smith, P. (2016). Cultural-historical activity theory and informal learning as a key component of co-design practice in a community initiative. In 8th Triennial Conference ESREA (European Society of Research on the Education of Adults), Imagining diverse futures for Adult Education: Questions of power and resources of creativity (pp. 8-11).Search in Google Scholar

Chen, W., Fujii, M., Cui, L., Ikeda, M., & Matsuda, N. (2012). Reflective Thinking Skills Learning Environment for Promoting Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Co-Construction in Medical Service Education. Knowledge Co-Creation, 2.Search in Google Scholar

David, S., Sabiescu, A. G., & Cantoni, L. (2013). Co-design with communities. A reflection on the literature. In Proceedings of the 7th International Development Informatics Association Conference (No. 2013, pp. 152-166). Pretoria, South Africa: IDIA.Search in Google Scholar

De la Harpe, R., Korpela, M., & Van Zyl, I. (2015). Co-Design for Development: Lessons Learnt from an Information Systems Project in Underserved Communities. In Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems (pp. 61-74). Springer, Cham.Search in Google Scholar

Del Gaudio, C., Franzato, C., & de Oliveira, A. J. (2018). Co-design for democratising and its risks for democracy. CoDesign.Search in Google Scholar

Dennerlein, S., Rella, M., Tomberg, V., Theiler, D., Treasure-Jones, T., Kerr, M., ... & Trattner, C. (2014). Making sense of bits and pieces: A sensemaking tool for informal workplace learning. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 391-397). Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_31Search in Google Scholar

Dennerlein, S. M., Tomberg, V., Treasure-Jones, T., Theiler, D., Lindstaedt, S., & Ley, T. (2020). Co-designing tools for workplace learning: A method for analysing and tracing the appropriation of affordances in design-based research. Information and Learning Sciences.10.1108/ILS-09-2019-0093Search in Google Scholar

Dodero, G., Gennari, R., Melonio, A., & Torello, S. (2014). Gamified co-design with cooperative learning. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 707-718). ACM.10.1145/2559206.2578870Search in Google Scholar

ESRC (2019) Guidance for collaboration. Economic and Social Research Council. Available at https://esrc.ukri.org/collaboration/guidance-for-collaboration/Search in Google Scholar

Eyles, H., Jull, A., Dobson, R., Firestone, R., Whittaker, R., Te Morenga, L., ... & Mhurchu, C. N. (2016). Co-design of mHealth delivered interventions: a systematic review to assess key methods and processes. Current Nutrition Reports, 5(3), 160-167.10.1007/s13668-016-0165-7Search in Google Scholar

Fathalla, M. F. (2015) Sexual and reproductive health for all: The challenge still stands, Global Public Health, 10:2, 135-136, DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2014.986172Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, I. (2014). Analysing University students’ participation in the co-design of learning scenarios. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Hickey, G., Brearley, S., Coldham, T., Denegri, S., Green, G., Staniszewska, S., Tembo, D., Torok, K., and Turner, K. (2018) Guidance on co-producing a research project. Southampton: INVOLVE. Available at: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Copro_Guidance_Feb19.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Holmlid, S., Mattelmäki, T., Visser, F. S., & Vaajakallio, K. (2015). Co-creative practices in service innovation. In The Handbook of Service Innovation (pp. 545-574). Springer, London.B810.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_25Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, A., Pan, Y. C., & Askool, S. (2016). An organisational semiotics perspective to co-design of technology enhanced learning. In International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations (pp. 197-202). Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-42102-5_22Search in Google Scholar

Kieslinger, B., Pata, K., & Fabian, C. M. (2009). Participatory design methods for learning and knowledge sharing activities in networked organisations. In International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace, New York. Retrieved November (Vol. 1, p. 2010).Search in Google Scholar

Koulouris, P., & Dimaraki, E. V. (2014). Digital gaming for co-creativity in learning: Theory-framed co-design with school communities. In Proceedings of the 18th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (pp. 1-6). ACM.10.1145/2645791.2645816Search in Google Scholar

Kusmin, M. (2019). Co-Designing the Kits of IoT Devices for Inquiry-Based Learning in STEM. Technologies, 7(1), 16.10.3390/technologies7010016Search in Google Scholar

Kyza, E. A., & Nicolaidou, I. (2017). Co-designing reform-based online inquiry learning environments as a situated approach to teachers’ professional development. CoDesign, 13(4), 261-286.10.1080/15710882.2016.1209528Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, I., Kinder, T., & Stenvall, J. (2018). Co-design and action learning in local public services. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 24(1), 58-80.10.1177/1477971417725344Search in Google Scholar

Law, N., Yuen, J., & Lee, Y. (2014). Supporting teacher learning for pedagogical innovation through collaborative co-design: Issues and challenges. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Ley, T., Cook, J., Dennerlein, S., Kravcik, M., Kunzmann, C., Pata, K., ... & Al-Smadi, M. (2014). Scaling informal learning at the workplace: A model and four designs from a large-scale design-based research effort. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1036-1048.10.1111/bjet.12197Search in Google Scholar

Lough, O., & O’Callaghan, S. (2021). Five years on from the World Humanitarian Summit: lots of talk, no revolution. ODI. Available at: https://odi.org/en/insights/five-years-on-from-the-world-humanitarian-summit-lots-of-talk-no-revolution/Search in Google Scholar

Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for teaching and learning in technology-rich learning environments. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 6(04), 258-271.10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-04-05Search in Google Scholar

Marshalsey, L., & Sclater, M. (2018). Supporting students’ self-directed experiences of studio learning in Communication Design: The co-creation of a participatory methods process model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(6).10.14742/ajet.4498Search in Google Scholar

Marston, C., Renedo, A., & Miles, S. (2020). Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. The Lancet. Lancet Volume 395, issue 10238, 1676-167810.1016/S0140-6736(20)31054-0Search in Google Scholar

Mattelmäki, T., & Sleeswijk Visser, F. (2011). Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of Co-design and Co-creation. In 4th World Conference on Design Research (IASDR 2011). Delft, The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

Millard, D., Howard, Y., Gilbert, L., & Wills, G. (2010). Co-design and co-deployment methodologies for innovative m-learning systems. In Multiplatform e-learning systems and technologies: Mobile devices for ubiquitous ICT-based education (pp. 147-163). IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

Mulvale, A., Miatello, A., Hackett, C., & Mulvale, G. (2016). Applying experience-based co-design with vulnerable populations: Lessons from a systematic review of methods to involve patients, families and service providers in child and youth mental health service improvement. Patient Experience Journal, 3(1), 117-12910.35680/2372-0247.1104Search in Google Scholar

NIHR. (2020) Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research. National Institute for Health Research. Available at: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/our-key-priorities/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, J., Fossey, E., & Palmer, V. J. (2021). A scoping review of the use of co-design methods with culturally and linguistically diverse communities to improve or adapt mental health services. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(1), 1-17.10.1111/hsc.13105Search in Google Scholar

Page, G. G., Wise, R. M., Lindenfeld, L., Moug, P., Hodgson, A., Wyborn, C., & Fazey, I. (2016). Co-designing transformation research: lessons learned from research on deliberate practices for transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 86-92.10.1016/j.cosust.2016.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Redman, S., Greenhalgh, T., Adedokun, L., Staniszewska, S., & Denegri, S. (2021). Co-production of Knowledge Collection Steering Committee. Co-production of knowledge: the future. bmj, 372.Search in Google Scholar

Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P. (2020). Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health research policy and systems, 18(1), 1-13.10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9Search in Google Scholar

Stonbraker, S., Richards, S., Halpern, M., Bakken, S., & Schnall, R. (2019). Priority Topics for Health Education to Support HIV Self-Management in Limited-Resource Settings. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 51(2), 168-177.10.1111/jnu.12448Search in Google Scholar

Tomberg, V., Al-Smadi, M., Treasure-Jones, T., & Ley, T. (2013). A Sensemaking Interface for Doctors’ Learning at Work: A Co-Design Study Using a Paper Prototype. In ECTEL meets ECSCW 2013: Workshop on Collaborative Technologies for Working and Learning (p. 54).Search in Google Scholar

Treasure-Jones, T., & Joynes, V. (2018). Co-design of technology-enhanced learning resources. The clinical teacher, 15(4), 281-286.10.1111/tct.12733Search in Google Scholar

Vindrola-Padros, C., Eyre, L., Baxter, H., Cramer, H., George, B., Wye, L., ... & Marshall, M. (2019). Addressing the challenges of knowledge co-production in quality improvement: learning from the implementation of the researcher-in-residence model. BMJ Qual Saf, 28(1), 67-73.10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007127Search in Google Scholar

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 5-23.10.1007/BF02504682Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, X. D., Luk, S. C. Y., Han, Y. H., Chen, G. R., Zhang, G. L., Zhu, B. S., & Luchters, S. (2019). Ethical considerations for conducting sexual and reproductive health research with female adolescents engaged in high-risk behaviours in China. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 20, 46-53.10.1016/j.srhc.2019.02.005Search in Google Scholar

WHO. (2012). Health education: theoretical concepts, effective strategies and core competencies. A foundation document to guide capacity development of health educators. Available at: https://applications.emro.who.int/dsaf/EMRPUB_2012_EN_1362.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Zamenopoulos, T., & Alexiou, K. (2018). Co-design as collaborative research. Bristol University/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-05
Accepted: 2022-05-09
Published Online: 2022-07-18

© 2022 Francisco Iniesto et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 6.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/edu-2022-0017/html
Scroll Up Arrow