Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 4, 2020

Musonius Rufus, Cleanthes, and the Stoic Community at Rome

  • Benjamin Harriman EMAIL logo
From the journal Elenchos

Abstract

Surprisingly little attention has been devoted to Musonius Rufus, a noted teacher and philosopher in first–century CE Rome, despite ample evidence for his impact in the period. This paper attempts to situate Musonius in relation to his philosophical predecessors in order to clarify both the contemporary status of the Stoic tradition and the value of engaging with the central figures of that school’s history. I make the case for seeing Cleanthes as a particularly prominent predecessor for Musonius and reaffirm the importance of framing his philosophical commitments in the context of the Stoic tradition. On this latter point, I attempt to connect Musonius’ perspective on askesis and moral development with that of Posidonius (and Seneca). In doing so, I push back against the sometimes overly schematic intellectualism attributed to Stoic ethics generally.


Corresponding author: Benjamin Harriman, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, E-mail:

References

Ademollo, F. 2020. “Cosmic and Individual Soul in Early Stoicism.” In Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy, Edited by B. Inwood and J. Warren, 113–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108641487.006Search in Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. 2014. “Plato’s Authority and the Formation of Textual Communities.” Classical Quarterly 64: 793–807, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838814000500.Search in Google Scholar

Bignone, E. 1936. L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. R. 1996. “The ἐλευστικὴ δύναμις in Aristo’s Psychology of Action.” Phronesis 41: 75–94, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852896321051792.Search in Google Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. R. 2009. “Cornutus und sein philosophisches Umfeld: Der Antiplatonismus der Epidrome.” In Cornutus. Die griechischen Götter, edited by H. G. Nesselrath, 141–61. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.10.1628/978-3-16-156441-3Search in Google Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. R. 2013. “Seneca Against Plato: Letters 58 and 65.” In Plato and the Stoics, edited by A. G. Long. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139629157.007Search in Google Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. R. 2018. L. Annaeus Cornutus: Greek Theology, Fragments, and Testimonia. Atlanta: SBL Press.10.2307/j.ctv9b2vx6Search in Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. 1993. “Aspects of the Social Thought of Dio Chrysostom and the Stoics.” In Studies in Greek History and Thought, edited by P. A. Brunt, 210–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1017/S0068673500003576Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 1980. “Aristotle on Learning to Be Good.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, edited by A. Rorty, 69–92. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520340985-008Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1999. “Posidonius on Emotions.” In Reason and Emotion, edited by J. Cooper, 449–84. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691223261-024Search in Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. 1982. Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Search in Google Scholar

Dragona–Monachou, M. 1973. “Providence and Fate in Stoicism and prae–Neoplatonism.” Philosophia 3: 262–300.Search in Google Scholar

Dragona–Monachou, M. 1974. “Posidonius’ ‘hierarchy’ between God, Fate and Nature and Cicero’s De Divinatione.” Philosophia 4: 286–301.Search in Google Scholar

Dyroff, A. 1897. Die Ethik der alten Stoa. Berlin: S. Calvary.10.1515/agph.1898.11.2.491Search in Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. 1936. “The Philosophical System of Posidonius.” American Journal of Philosophy 57: 286–325, https://doi.org/10.2307/290529.Search in Google Scholar

Edelstein, L., and I. G. Kidd (eds.) 1972–1999. Posidonius, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fillion–Lahille, J. 1984. Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, C. 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152682.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goulet–Cazé, M. O. 2005. s.v. “Musonius Rufus.” In Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques, Vol. IV, edited by R. Goulet, 555–72. Paris: CNRS (1989–2012).Search in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1972. Plotinus and the Stoics. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320437Search in Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hense, O. (ed.) 1905. C. Musonii Rufi Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkinson, N. (ed.) 1988. A Hellenistic Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Houser, J. S. 1997. The Philosophy of Musonius Rufus: A Study of Applied Ethics in the Late Stoa. PhD Thesis: Brown University.Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 1993. “Seneca and Psychological Dualism.” In Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by J. Brunschwig, and M. C. Nussbaum, 150–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 1995. “Seneca in his Philosophical Milieu.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 63–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/311301.Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 1999. “Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by K. Ierodiakonou, 95–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.022Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 2017. “The Legacy of Musonius Rufus.” In From Stoicism to Platonism, edited by T. Engberg–Pedersen, 254–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316694459.014Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. 1934. Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development, Trans. R. Robinson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kidd, I. G. 1978. “Moral Actions and Rules in Stoic Ethics.” In The Stoics, edited by J. Rist, 247–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1525/9780520339255-013Search in Google Scholar

Laurand, V. 2014. Stoïcisme et lien social: Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. A. 1996. “Heraclitus and Stoicism.” In Stoic Studies, edited by A. A. Long, 35–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. G. 2017. “Plato, Chrysippus and Posidonius’ Theory of Affective Movements.” In From Stoicism to Platonism, edited by T. Engberg–Pedersen, 27–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316694459.002Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808050Search in Google Scholar

Lutz, C. E. 1947. “Musonius Rufus ‘The Roman Socrates’.” Yale Classical Studies 10: 3–147.Search in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1979. “Providence and the Destruction of the Universe in Early Stoic Thought. With Some Remarks on the ‘Mysteries of Philosophy’.” In Studies in Hellenistic Religions, edited by M. J. Vermaseren, 129–88. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004295575_009Search in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 2015. “Heraclitus on the Soul and Super–Soul with an afterthought on the Afterlife.” Rhizomata 3: 62–93, https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2015-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Mayor, J. B. 1880. M. Tullii Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1999. “The Stoic Theory of Categories.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.Search in Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. 1993. “Seneca on Reason, Rule and Moral Development.” In Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by J. Brunschwig, and M. C. Nussbaum, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Most, G. W. 1989. “Cornutus and Stoic Allegoresis.” ANRW 36.3: 2014–65.Search in Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. R. 2007. “Did the Timaeus Create a Textual Community?.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 47: 167–91.Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, A. C. 1891. The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes. London: C.J. Clay and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. 1958. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. 1948. Die Stoa. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Rubrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, J. U. (ed.) 1925. Collectanea Alexandrina: Reliquiae minores poetarum Graecorum aetatis Ptolemaicae 323–146 A.C. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. 2001. Musonio: Diatribe, frammenti, e testimonianze. Milano: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Rauh, S. H. 2018. “Cato at Utica: The Emergence of a Roman Suicide Tradition.” American Journal of Philosophy 139: 59–91, https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2018.0002.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. 1921. Poseidonios. München: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. 1926. Kosmos und Sympathie. München: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Reydams–Schils, G. 1997. “Posidonius and the Timaeus: off to Rhodes and back to Plato?.” Classical Quarterly 47: 455–76, https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/47.2.455.Search in Google Scholar

Reydams–Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibilty, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reydams–Schils, G. 2017. “‘Becoming like God’ in Platonism and Stoicism.” In From Stoicism to Platonism, edited by T. Engberg–Pedersen, 142–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316694459.008Search in Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. 1977. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmekel, A. 1892. Die Philosophie der mittleren Stoa. Berlin: Weidmannsche.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1989. “Philosophical Allegiance in the Greco–Roman World.” In Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, edited by M. T. Griffin, and J. Barnes, 97–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1993. “Chrysippus on Psychophysical Causality.” In Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by J. Brunschwig, and M. C. Nussbaum, 313–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1999. “The Stoic–Platonist Debate on kathêkonta.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by K. Ierodiakonou, 128–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2005. “Stoic Metaphysics at Rome.” In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, edited by R. Salles, 117–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, J. 2007. “Stoic Practical Philosophy in the Imperial Period.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 50 (94): 115–40, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2007.tb02420.x.Search in Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. 1961. “Cleanthes or Posidonius? The Basis of Stoic Physics.” Med. der K. Nederl. Akad., Deel 24 (9): 265–89.Search in Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2002. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256600.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. 2005. Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Book II–III. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320925Search in Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004321175Search in Google Scholar

Van Geytenbeek, A. C. 1963. Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe. Assen: Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, P. G. 1997. Cicero: The Nature of the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G. 1977. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, Vol. II. Damascius, Amsterdam, North–Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. 2001. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zuntz, G. 1958. “Zum Kleanthes–Hymnus.” Harvard Studies of Classical Philology 63: 289–308, https://doi.org/10.2307/310862.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-04
Published in Print: 2020-11-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/elen-2020-0004/html
Scroll to top button