Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access November 27, 2015

Direct determination of shape functions for isoparametric elements with arbitrary node configuration

Julian Hoth and Wojciech Kowalczyk
From the journal Open Engineering

Abstract

Shape functions have been derived to describe different forms of elements, notably triangles and rectangles in 2-D, and tetrahedrons, cuboids, and triangular prisms in 3-D. There are generalised solutions for some regular node configurations, and hierarchical correction algorithms help with more difficult node distributions. But to this point there is no single formula or set of formulae that allows the direct determination of shape functions for any node configuration without restrictions. This paper shows how a general set of formulae can be derived which is applicable to any isoparametric element type with arbitrary node configuration. This formulation is in such a form that it is clear and concise. The approach is based on the Lagrange polynomial considering up to three Cartesian and four volume coordinates. Additionally, the correction procedure that is inherent in the formulation to guarantee an appropriate evaluation of the generalised shape functions and to fulfil all four isoparametric shape function criteria is discussed. The proof of validity illustrates the correctness of the method.

References

[1] Zienkiewicz O.C., Origins, milestones and directions of the finite element method - a personal view, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 1995, 2(1), 1–48 10.1007/BF02736188Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L., Zhu J.Z., The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, Elsevier,Oxford, UK, 2008 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zienkiewicz O.C., Irons B.M., Ergatoudis J.G., Ahmad S., Scott F.C., Isoparametric and associated element families for two and three dimensional analysis. In: B. Kolbein, I. Holand (Eds.), Finite Element Methods in Stress Analysis, Tapir Press, Trondheim, 1969, 383–432 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hughes T.J.R., The Finite Element Method, Dover, Mineola, New York, 2000 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Hughes T.J.R., Akin J.E., Techniques for developing ‘special’ finite element shape functions with particular reference to singularities, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1980, 15, 733–751 10.1002/nme.1620150509Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zienkiewicz O.C., Irons B.M., Campbell J., Scott F.C., Three dimensional stress analysis, IUTAM Symposium on High Speed Computing in Elasticity (23 August – 28 August 1970, Liège, Belgium) Search in Google Scholar

[7] Szabó B., Babuska I., Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Peano A.G., Hierarchies of conforming finite elements for elasticity and plate bending, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 1976, 2, 3–4 10.1016/0898-1221(76)90014-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zienkiewicz O.C., Gago J.P. de S.R., Kelly D.W., The hier- archical concept in finite element analysis, Computers and Structures 1983, 16, 53–65 10.1016/0045-7949(83)90147-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jarzebski P., Wisniewski K., Corrected shape functions for sixnode triangular element for heat conduction, In: T. Lodygowski, J. Rakowski, P. Litewka (Eds.), Recent Advances in Computational Mechanics, CRC Press, London, UK, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ahn J.S., Yang S.H., Woo K.S., ESL Based Cylindrical Shell Elements with Hierarchical Shape Functions for Laminated Composite Shells, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2015/676181/ 10.1155/2015/676181Search in Google Scholar

[12] Moxey D., Green M.D., Sherwin S.J., Peiró J., An isoparametric approach to high-order curvilinear boundary-layer meshing, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2015, 283, 636–650 10.1016/j.cma.2014.09.019Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ergatoudis J.G., Irons B.M., Zienkiewicz O.C., Curved, isoparametric, “quadrilateral” elements for finite element analysis, International Journal of Solids and Structures 1968, 4, 31–42 10.1016/0020-7683(68)90031-0Search in Google Scholar

[14] Irons B.M., Engineering application of numerical integration in stiffness method, AIAA Journal 1966, 4, 2035–2037 10.2514/3.3836Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zienkiewicz O.C., Cheung Y.K., The Finite Element Method in Structureal and Continuous Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, London, 1967 Search in Google Scholar

[16] RudinW., Principles ofMathematical Analysis, McGrawHill, New York, 1976 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Stapleton S.E, Gries T., Waas A.M., Pineda E.J., Adaptive Shape Functions and Internal Mesh Adaptation for Modelling Progressive Failure in Adhesively Bonded Joints, NASA Technical Report, 2015, NASA/TM—2014-218333 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.022Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lagrange J.-L., Lecons élémentaires sur les mathématiques, données à l’Ecole Normale en 1795. In: Lagrange J.-L., Oeuvres VII, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1877, 183–287 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Klein B., FEM, Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden, Germany, 2015 Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-11-21
Accepted: 2015-8-25
Published Online: 2015-11-27

©2015 J. Hoth and W. Kowalczyk

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 29.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2015-0049/html
Scroll Up Arrow