Abstract
Recent researchers have noted differences in the culture of entrepreneurship research between the USA and Europe, with European researchers being more policy orientated, more methodologically open, more inclined to favour multidsciplinary approaches and less preoccupied with “grand theories”. The leading entrepreneurship journals are US based, and increasingly becoming dominated by theory-driven approaches to research. As the US journals are edited and reviewed by international academics, including many European ones, this apparent culture difference cannot be accounted by national culture alone. This paper discusses the notion that the drive for setting rigorous standards for achieving elite status for the journals mainly through championing rigorous theory development is driven by the needs for setting benchmarks for research selectivity in Universities in both sides of the Atlantic. This results in a disturbing mismatch between academic and applied research, as most of the funding comes from governments who need answers to important policies rather than academic questions. This is particularly a serious challenge for a majority of European researchers who depend largely on policy sources for funding.
References
Blackburn, R. A., and D. Smallbone. 2008. “Researching Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in the U.K.: Developments and Distinctiveness.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32(2):267–88.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00226.xSearch in Google Scholar
Brush, C. G., T. S. Manolova, and L. F. Edelman. 2008. “Separated by a Common Language? Entrepreneurship Research Across the Atlantic.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32(2):249–66.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00225.xSearch in Google Scholar
Davidsson, P. 2003. “The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some Suggestions.” In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, edited by J. Katz and D. Shepherd, Vol. 6, 315–72. Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press.10.1016/S1074-7540(03)06010-0Search in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Row.Search in Google Scholar
Hjorth, D. 2008. “Nordic Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32(2):313–38.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00228.xSearch in Google Scholar
Katz, J. 2003. “The Chronology and Intellectual Trajectory of American Entrepreneurship Education: 1876–1999.” Journal of Business Venturing 18(2):283–300.10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00098-8Search in Google Scholar
Kuratko, D. 2005. “The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 29(5):577–98.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.xSearch in Google Scholar
Schmude, J., F. Welter, and S. Heumann. 2008. “Separated by a Common Language? Entrepreneurship Research across the Atlantic.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32(2):289–311.Search in Google Scholar
Welter, F. and F. Lasch. 2008. “Entrepreneurship Research in Europe: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32(2):241–48.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00224.xSearch in Google Scholar
Welter, F. 2011. “Contextualizing Entrepreneurship – Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 35(1):165–84.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.xSearch in Google Scholar
Wiklund, J., P. Davidsson, D. B. Audretsch, and C. Karlsson. 2011. “The Future of Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 35(1):1–9.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00420.xSearch in Google Scholar
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston
