Morphological richness, transparency and the evolution of morphonotactic patterns

References

Ambrazas, Vytautas (ed.). 2006. Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos gramatika [A grammar of modern Lithuanian]. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Andreas & Kamil Kaźmierski. 2016. A dynamical-systems approach to the evolution of morphonotactic and lexical consonant clusters in English and Polish. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 2. 115–139.10.1515/yplm-2016-0006Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Andreas, Christina Prömer & Nikolaus Ritt. 2015. Identifying therapeutic changes by simulating virtual language stages: A method and its application to Middle English coda phonotactics after schwa deletion. VIEWS 24. 1–31.10.2218/pihph.1.2016.1693Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Andreas, Christina Prömer & Nikolaus Ritt. 2016. Diachronic dynamics of Middle English phonotactics provide evidence for analogy effects among lexical and morphonotactic consonant clusters. Papers in Historical Phonology 1. 50–75.10.2218/pihph.1.2016.1693Search in Google Scholar

Boryś, Wiesław. 2005. Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego [Polish etymological dictionary]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Litterackie.Search in Google Scholar

Celata, Chiara, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Irene Ricci & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2015. Phonotactic processing and morpheme boundaries: Word-final /Cst/ clusters in German. Italian Journal of Linguistics 27. 85–110.Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej. 2010. Emergent stops in English and in Polish: Against syllable-based accounts. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46. 177–191.10.2478/v10010-010-0009-3Search in Google Scholar

Donegan, Patricia J. & Geoffrey S. Nathan. 2015. Natural phonology and sound change. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 431–449. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.007Search in Google Scholar

Donegan, Patricia J. & David Stampe. 1979. The study of natural phonology. In D. A. Dinnsen (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory, 126–173. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, Rebecca Hetherington, James Mc Elvenny & Virginia Dawson. 2013. World phonotactics data-base. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, The Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang & Alona Kononenko. 2018. German phonotactic vs. morphonotactic obstruent clusters: A corpuslinguistic analysis. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Sabine Sommer-Lolei & Basilio Calderone (eds.), Experimental and acquisitional approaches to morphonotactics. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985. Morphonology. The dynamics of derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1997. “Scenario” as a concept for the functional explanation of language change. In Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), Language change and functional explanations, 109–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1999. On a semiotic theory of preferences in language. In Michael Shapiro (ed.), The Peirce seminar papers, vol. 4. 389–415. New York: Bergham Books.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2002. Naturalness and morphological change. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 461–471. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & Lina Pestal. 2010. Change and variation in morphonotactics. Folia Linguistica Historica 31(1). 51–67.10.1515/flih.2010.003Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Miroslava Hliničanová, Matej Ďurčo, Karlheinz Mörth & Katharina Korecky-Kröll. 2015. Phonotactic vs. morphonotactic obstruent clusters in Slovak and German. Italian Journal of Linguistics 27. 45–60.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Marianne Kilani-Schoch. 2017. Natural morphology. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 356–389. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139814720.014Search in Google Scholar

Duanmu, San. 2008. Syllable structure: The limits of variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267590.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2001. Phonotactic constraints are preferences. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.), Constraints and preferences, 69–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110881066Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2002. Beats-and-binding phonology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2009. NP extension: B&B phonotactics. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(1). 55–71.10.2478/v10010-009-0011-9Search in Google Scholar

Freiberger, Eva Maria. 2014. Der Erwerb von Konsonantenclustern im Deutschen: Eine Untersuchung longitudinaler Spontansprachkorpora [The acquisition of consonant clusters in German; an investigation of longitudinal spontaneous corpora]. Slowakische Zeitschrift Für Germanistik 6. 5–23.Search in Google Scholar

Freiberger, Eva Maria, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Basilio Calderone & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2015. Morpheme boundaries inside consonant clusters delay visual word recognition: Evidence from a lexical decision and a progressive demasking experiment. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Phonotactics and Phonotactic Modeling (PPM 2015), Vienna, 26 November.Search in Google Scholar

Hermann, Eduard. 1931. Lautgesetz und Analogie. Berlin: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Hliničanová, Miroslava, Matej Ďurčo, Karlheinz Mörth & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2017. Phonotaktische versus morphonotaktische Konsonantengruppen im Slowakischen und Deutschen: Eine kontrastive korpuslinguistische Untersuchung. In Claudia Resch & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Digitale Methoden der Korpusforschung in Österreich (Veröffentlichungen zur Linguistik und Kommunikationsforschung Nr. 30), 159–178. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.10.2307/j.ctt1v2xvkj.11Search in Google Scholar

Iacobini, Claudio. 2004. Prefissazione [Prefixation]. In Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds.), La formazione delle parole in Italiano, 69–163. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Issatschenko, Alexander. 1974. Das “Schwa mobile” und “Schwa constans” im Deutschen [„Mobile schwa“ and „constant schwa“ in German]. In Ulrich Engel & Paul Grebe (eds.), Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch, Festschrift für Hugo Moser, vol. 1, 142–171. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Kamandulyte, Laura. 2006. The acquisition of morphonotactics in Lithuanian. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 73. 88–96.Search in Google Scholar

Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Laura. 2015. Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs SLI. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat [Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics] 11. 95–109.10.5128/ERYa11.06Search in Google Scholar

Kazlauskas, Jonas. 1968. Lietuvių kalbos istorinė gramatika [Historical grammar of the Lithuanian language]. Vilnius: Mintis.Search in Google Scholar

Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 1985. Natural morphology and classical vs. Tunisian Arabic. Studia Gramatyczne 7. 27–47.Search in Google Scholar

Korecky-Kröll, Katharina & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2015. (Mor)phonotactics in high vs. low SES children. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & Jarosław Weckwerth (eds.), Rajendra Singh: In memoriam. Papers from a special commemorative session at the 44th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 25–40. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Korecky-Kröll, Katharina, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Eva Maria Freiberger, Eva Reinisch, Karlheinz Mörth & Gary Libben. 2014. Morphonotactic and phonotactic processing in German-speaking adults. Language Sciences 46. 48–58.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.006Search in Google Scholar

Korecky-Kröll, Katharina, Eva M. Freiberger, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Basilio Calderone. 2016. Acquiring and processing German words of different (mor)phonotactic structure: Morpheme boundaries inside consonant clusters delay processing, but not acquisition. Poster presented at the 10th International Conference on the Mental Lexicon. Ottawa, 19 October.Search in Google Scholar

Laine, Matti, Seppo Vainio & Hyönä Jukka. 1999. Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language 40. 109–135.10.1006/jmla.1998.2615Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013a. Consonant inventories. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/1 accessed on 23/4/18.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013b. Syllable structure. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/1 accessed on 1/11/18.Search in Google Scholar

Mayrhofer-Passler, Edeltraut. 1952. Der Quantitätsablaut in den indogermanischen Sprachen [Quantitative apophony in the Indo-European languages]. In Wilhelm Brandenstein (ed.), Studien zur indogermanischen Grundsprache, 15–22. Wien: Gerold.Search in Google Scholar

Ohala, John. 2010. The emergent syllable. In Barbara L. David & Krisztina Zajdó (eds.), The syllables in speech production, 179–186. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Ohala, John & Haruko Kawasaki-Fukumori. 1997. Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In Stig Eliasson & Ernst Håkon Jahr (eds.), Language and its ecology: Essays in memory of Einar Haugen. Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs, vol. 100. 343–365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Passler, Edeltraut. 1947. Der indogermanische Ablaut als funktionelles Element [The Indo-European apophony as functional element]. Revue Des Études Indo-Européennes 4. 365–404.Search in Google Scholar

Pugh, Stephan & Ian Press. 2005. Ukrainian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ravid, Dorit, Orit Ashkenazi, Ronit Levie, G. Ben-Zadok, T. Grunwald & Steven Gillis. 2016. Foundations of the early root category: Analyses of linguistic input to Hebrew-speaking children. In Ruth A. Berman (ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence, 95–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.19.04ravSearch in Google Scholar

Shimron, Joseph (ed.). 2002. Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/lald.28Search in Google Scholar

Skalička, Vladimír. 1979. Typologische Studien. Braunschweig: Viewegh.10.1007/978-3-322-86349-2Search in Google Scholar

Sommer-Lolei, Sabine, Katharina Korecky-Kröll & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2018. Acquisition and processing of (mor)phonotactic patterns of German consonant clusters. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Sabine Sommer-Lolei & Basilio Calderone (eds.), Experimental and acquisitional approaches to Morphonotactics. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Stang, Christian. 1966. Vergleichende Grammatik der Baltischen Sprachen[Comparative grammar of the Baltic languages]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Search in Google Scholar

Stopp, Hugo. 1974. Veränderungen im System der Substantivflexion vom Althochdeutschen bis zum Neuhochdeutschen [Changes in the system of noun inflection from old high German to new high German]. In Ulrich Engel & Paul Grebe (eds.), Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch, Festschrift für Hugo Moser, vol. 2, 324–344. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Search in Google Scholar

Thoursie, Stig A. O. 1984. Die Verbalflexion eines südbairischen Autographs aus dem Jahr 1464, Ein Beitrag zur frühneuhochdeutschen Morphologie [Verbal inflection of a Southern Bavarian manuscript of 1464. A contribution to early New High German morphology]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Monica, Valerie L. Shafer, Brett Martin & Mitchell Steinschneider. 2012. The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: A behavioural and event related potential (ERP) study. Brain and Language 123. 30–41.10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Walczak, Bogdan. 1999. Zarys dziejów języka polskiego. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1963. Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the old Irish verb. Celtica 6. 1–49.Search in Google Scholar

Werner, Otmar. 1978. Schwa-Schwund und Phonotaktik im Deutschen. In H.D. Pohl (ed.), Opuscula Slavica et linguistica: Festschrift für Alexander Issatschenko, 471–486. Klagenfurt: Heyn.Search in Google Scholar

Xanthos, Aris, Sabine Laaha, Steven Gillis, Ursula Stephany, Ayhan Aksu-Koç, Anastasia Christofidou, Natalia Gagarina, Gordana Hrzica, F. Nihan Ketrez, Marianne Kilani-Schoch, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Melita Kovačević, Klaus Laalo, Marijan Palmović, Barbara Pfeiler, Maria D. Voeikova & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2011. On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language 31. 461–479.10.1177/0142723711409976Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina. 2007. Polish morphonotactics in first language acquisition. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 74. 24–44.Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina. 2010. Consonant clusters across morpheme boundaries: Polish morphonotactic inventory and its acquisition. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46. 565–588.10.2478/v10010-010-0028-0Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina, Laura Kamandulyte, Eva Freiberger, Katharina Korecky-Kröll & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2015. Morphological richness facilitates first language acquisition of morphonotactic consonant clusters: Polish and Lithuanian vs. Austrian German and English. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Phonotactics and Phonotactic Modeling (PPM 2015). Vienna, 26th November.Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina, Paula Orzechowska, Michał Jankowski, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Piotr Wierzchoń & Dawid Pietrala. 2016. Phonotactics and morphonotactics of Polish and English: Description, tools and applications. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar