Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 12, 2019

On the development of two progressive constructions in U̠t-Ma’in

Rebecca Paterson
From the journal Folia Linguistica

Abstract

U̠t-Ma’in (Kainji, Benue-Congo), spoken in northwestern Nigeria, has two morphosyntactically distinct progressive constructions – the Intransitive Progressive Construction and the Transitive Progressive Construction. This paper presents the synchronic structure of each construction, proposed historical sources of the distinct morphological pieces, and a comparison of the U̠t-Ma’in Progressive Constructions with cognate elements from four Kainji language clusters. No single source component has grammaticalized to mark progressive aspect in U̠t-Ma’in. Rather, the combination of several elements created the progressive. Formal changes in several morphosyntactic elements within each of the constructions provide evidence that originally nominalized verb forms are gradually becoming less noun-like and more verb-like. These developments are examples of constructionalization, as the Progressive Constructions exist as new form-meaning pairs distinct from the source. These formal changes also show signs of adjustment, whereby a construction moves toward isomorphism, that is, a one-to-one correspondence between form and meaning. Specifically, various stages of morphological loss are evident in particular lexemes when used in U̠t-Ma’in Progressive Constructions, gradually spreading throughout the lexicon.

Abbreviations

1

1st person

3

3rd person

A

agent-like argument

ag

agreement marker

assoc

associative marker

aux

auxilliary

c

class marker

cop

copula

cxn

construction

d

definite

def

definite

dem

demonstrative

dim

diminuative

foc

focus

fut

future

hum

human

ir

irrealis

loc

locative marker

neg

negative

NP

noun phrase

npers

non-personal

nmlz

nominalized

O

object argument

obj

object form

obl

obligation

poss

possessive

prf

perfect tense

prog

progressive aspect

pst

past

recip

recipient

rel

relative marker

S

single argument

sg

singular

sbj

subject

thm

theme

tns

tense

V

verb

VP

verb phrase

Ackowledgements

I wish to thank the members of the U̠t-Ma’in speaking community who have welcomed me over the years and taught me so much about their language and way of life. I also thank my colleagues at the University of Oregon specifically, Doris L. Payne, Spike Gildea, Sara Pacchiarotti, Shahar Shirtz, Marie-Caroline Pons and Don Daniels for input on previous drafts of this study. I am grateful to Muriel Norde, the editorial board, and two anonymous reviewers at Folia Linguistica Historica for their encouragement and input. Funding for this study was provided by the Center for the Study of Women in Society at the University of Oregon (2016) and the Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research (2016). The last stages of this project have received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 758232).

References

Bendor-Samuel, John, Donna Skitch & Esther Cressman. 1973. Duka sentence, clause and phrase. Zaria: Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Beyer, Klaus. 2009. Double negation-marking. In Norbert Cyffer, Erwin Ebermann & Georg Ziegelmeyer (eds.), Negation patterns in West African languages and beyond (Typological Studies in Language 87), 205–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.87.11beySearch in Google Scholar

Blench, Roger. 2018. Nominal affixing in the Kainji languages of northwestern and central Nigeria. In John Watters (ed.), East Benue-Congo: Nouns, pronouns, and verbs. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernd. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166119Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Crozier, David H. 1984. A study in the discourse grammar of Cishingini. PhD dissertation, University of Ibadan.Search in Google Scholar

Davey, Jennifer. 2011. A grammatical sketch of the Ca̠hungwarya language. Electronic ms.Search in Google Scholar

Dettweiler, Stephen 2015 Portrait of C’Lela grammar. Electronic ms.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1986 Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 12. 95–107.10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866Search in Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Ludwig. 1989. Kainji and Platoid. In John Bendor-Samuel (ed.), Niger-Congo languages, 359–376. Lanham: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, David & Carleen Heath. 2002. A phonological and grammatical sketch of the Dukawa language. Electronic ms.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1994. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 255–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.08heiSearch in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske Helmet Verlag Gmbh.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440Search in Google Scholar

König, Christa. 2008. Case in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacDonell, James. 2007. A phonological and grammatical sketch of the Pongu language. Electronic ms.Search in Google Scholar

McGill, Stuart. 2009. Gender and person agreement in Cicipu discourse. PhD dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies. http://www.cicipu.org/papers/gender_and_person_agreement_in_cicipu_discourse.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

McGill, Stuart & Roger Blench. 2012. Documentation, development, and ideology in the northwestern Kainji languages. In Stuart McGill & Peter K. Austin (eds.), Language documentation and description, vol. 11. 90–135. London: SOAS.Search in Google Scholar

Mierau, Eric. 1967. Notes on the Agwara dialect of Kambari. Electronic ms.Search in Google Scholar

Overall, Simon E., Rosa Vallejos & Spike Gildea. 2018. Nonverbal predication in Amazonia. In Simon E. Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Gildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Amazonian Languages (Typological Studies in Language 122), 1–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.122Search in Google Scholar

Paterson, Rebecca. 2015. Narrative uses of the U̠t-Ma’in (Kainji) Bare Verb form. In Doris L. Payne & Shahar Shirtz (eds.), Beyond aspect: the expression of discourse functions in African languages (Typological Studies in Language 109), 219–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.109.08patSearch in Google Scholar

Paterson, Rebecca Smith. 2012. Semantics of U̠t-Ma’in noun classes. In Roger Blench & Stuart McGill (eds.), Advances in minority language research in Nigeria, vol. I. 239–272. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805066Search in Google Scholar

Regnier, Clark. 2003. A sociolinguistic survey of the people of Fakai District. Stephen and Sonia Dettweiler (eds.). http://www.sil.org/silesr/2003/silesr2003-021.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Rowbory, Jonathan David 2009. A Focused Study of C’lela Verb Inflection. MA thesis, Nairobi Evangelical Graduate School of Theology.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Rebecca Dow [Paterson]. 2007. The noun class system of u̠t-Ma’in, a West Kainji language of Northwestern Nigeria. MA thesis, University of North Dakota.Search in Google Scholar

Stark, Janie P. 2010. Kambari orthography design. Dallas: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 142–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.10.7560/750357-006Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elisabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language 37(3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 473–489.10.1075/bct.79.01intSearch in Google Scholar

Van de Velde, Mark. 2013. The Bantu connective construction. In Anne Carlier & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds.), The genitive Case and grammatical relations across languages 5, 217–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cagral.5.08velSearch in Google Scholar

Watters, John R. 2018. East Benue-Congo. In John R. Watters (ed.), East Benue-Congo: Nouns, pronouns, and verbs. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Welmers, William E. 1963. Associative a and ka in Niger-Congo. Language 39(3). Linguistic Society of America. 432–447.10.2307/411125Search in Google Scholar

Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, Kay & Roger M. Blench. 2000. Niger-Congo. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), African languages: an introduction, 11–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-09-27
Revised: 2019-03-13
Revised: 2019-07-26
Accepted: 2019-08-28
Published Online: 2019-11-12
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow