Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 8, 2016

Why we need a token-based typology: A case study of analytic and lexical causatives in fifteen European languages

Natalia Levshina
From the journal Folia Linguistica

Abstract

This paper investigates variation of lexical and analytic causatives in 15 European languages from the Germanic, Romance, and Slavic genera based on a multilingual parallel corpus of film subtitles. Using typological parameters of variation of causatives from the literature, this study tests which parameters are relevant for the choice between analytic and lexical causatives in the sample of languages. The main research question is whether the variation is constrained by one semantic dimension, namely, the conceptual integration of the causing and caused events, as suggested by previous research on iconicity in language, or whether several different semantic and syntactic factors are at play. To answer this question, I use an exploratory multivariate technique for categorical data (Multiple Correspondence Analysis with supplementary points) and conditional random forests, a nonparametric regression and classification method. The study demonstrates the importance of corpus data in testing typological hypotheses.

Acknowledgments

The author is very grateful to Hubert Cuyckens, Karolina Krawczak, Michael Cysouw, and an anonymous reviewer for their invaluable criticisms and suggestions, as well as to Jose Garcia Miguel and Björn Wiemer for their consultations on some tricky language-specific constructions. I am also indebted to my ex-colleagues from the Catholic University of Louvain, Ludivine Cribble and Samantha Laporte, who helped me to obtain the measures of interrater agreement. The main part of this research was funded by a postdoctoral grant received from the Belgian research foundation F.R.S.-FNRS. All usual disclaimers apply.

Abbreviations

1/2/3

first/second/third person

acc

accusative

fut

future

inf

infinitive

pfv

perfective

pl

plural

prs

present

refl

reflexive

sg

singular

Abbreviations used in figures

bg

Bulgarian

cs

Czech

de

German

en

English

es

Spanish

fr

French

it

Italian

nl

Dutch

no

Norwegian

pl

Polish

pt

Portuguese

ro

Romanian

ru

Russian

sl

Slovenian

sv

Swedish

References

Bickel, Balthasar, Jan Strunk, Swintha Danielsen, Iren Hartmann, Brigitte Pakendorf, Søren Wichmann, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko & Frank Seifart. 2015. Noun-to-verb ratio and word order. Presentation at the conference Diversity linguistics: Retrospect and Prospect, MPI EVA, Leipzig, Germany, 1–3 May.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2014. Inducing semantic roles. In Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 23–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.106.02cysSearch in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael & Bernhard Wälchli. 2007. Parallel texts: Using translational equivalents in linguistic typology. Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung (STUF) 60(2). 95–99.10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.95Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of adjective and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/87. (accessed 20 March 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info (accessed 20 March 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. 1970. Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2005. Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Jan-Ola Östman & Miriam Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.3.03golSearch in Google Scholar

Greenacre, Michael. 2007. Correspondence analysis in practice, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.10.1201/9781420011234Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819.10.2307/413373Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Michael Cysouw. 2014. Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies. Studies in Language 38(3). 463–484.10.1075/bct.88.02harSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33.10.1515/COG.2008.001Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80.10.1515/flin.2011.002Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci. 2014. Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50(3). 587–625.10.1017/S0022226714000255Search in Google Scholar

Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674.10.1198/106186006X133933Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen. 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5(2). 115–156.10.1515/cogl.1994.5.2.115Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid I. 2001. Causatives. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 886–898. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid I. & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. 1992. Questionnaire zur Kausativierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(2). 137–149.10.1524/stuf.1992.45.14.137Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 487–520.10.1515/flin-2015-0017Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2016. Verbs of letting in Germanic and Romance languages: A quantitative investigation based on a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Languages in Contrast 16(1). 84–117.10.1075/lic.16.1.04levSearch in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2017. Online film subtitles as a corpus: An n-gram approach. To appear in Corpora 12(3).10.3366/cor.2017.0123Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman. 2013. Mapping constructional spaces: A contrastive analysis of English and Dutch analytic causatives. Linguistics 51(4). 825–854.10.1515/ling-2013-0028Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie. 2010. Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 1–64. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110220377Search in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1976. Kausativkonstruktionen. Tübingen: TBL.Search in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir & Georgij Sil’nickij 1973. Typologie der kausativen Konstruktionen. Folia Linguistica 6(3/4). 273–290.10.1515/flin.1973.6.3-4.273Search in Google Scholar

Nenadić, Oleg & Michael Greenacre. 2007. Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software 20(3). 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i03/ (accessed 12 April 2015).10.18637/jss.v020.i03Search in Google Scholar

Quasthoff, Uwe, Dirk Goldhahn & Thomas Eckart. 2014. Building large resources for text mining: The Leipzig Corpora Collection. In Chries Biemann & Alexander Mehler (eds.), Text miningFrom ontology learning to automated text processing applications, 3–24. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_1Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 12 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2012. Stages of grammaticalization of causative verbs and constructions in Portuguese, Spanish, French and Italian. Folia Linguistica 46(2). 513–552.10.1515/flin.2012.018Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin & Achim Zeileis 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 307. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/307 (accessed 17 March 2015)10.1186/1471-2105-9-307Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Search in Google Scholar

Tiedemann, Jörg. 2012. Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012), 2214–2218. Istanbul. Available at www.lrec conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/463 Paper.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, Volker Gast & Jaroen Vanderbiesen. 2012. Human impersonal pronouns in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 98. 27–64Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160.10.7591/9781501743726-005Search in Google Scholar

von Waldenfels, Ruprecht. 2012. The grammaticalization of “give”+infinitive: A comparative study of Russian, Polish and Czech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110293777Search in Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3). 671–710.10.1515/ling-2012-0021Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-5-25
Revised: 2015-11-17
Revised: 2016-2-9
Accepted: 2016-5-31
Published Online: 2016-11-8
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Scroll Up Arrow