Abstract
Tibeto-Burman languages show a drastic difference in the stability of independent and bound 2nd person forms. The 2nd person pronoun *naŋ is the most stable form in the Proto-Trans-Himalayan paradigm, preserved in almost every low-level clade, while 1st person is sometimes replaced. But 2nd person indexation in the verb is highly unstable. There were two distinct forms already in PTH, a suffix #-na, belonging to the original paradigm, and an innovative prefix #tV-, as well as an irrealis form which could be used with 2nd person reference. In daughter languages across the family we find further innovations in this category. These facts pose two questions. The first – why is 2nd person indexation so unstable? – can be interpreted in terms of politeness and face management. But this raises another question – if 2nd person indexation is inherently unstable, why is 2nd person independent pronominal reference not? The difference in stability reflects a difference in function. In Tibeto-Burman languages, with or without argument indexation, independent pronouns are always ‘optional’, i.e. carry some information management function such as contrast. Thus when pronominal reference to the addressee might be awkward, it can always be avoided, so there is no need to innovate face-saving substitutes for it. In contrast, in languages with argument indexation, the verbal index is obligatory, so any desire to avoid direct reference to one’s interlocutor requires adopting an alternative construction which then, over time, may grammaticalize into a new 2nd person index.
References
Arden, Michelle. 2010. A phonetic, phonological, and morphosyntactic analysis of the Mara language. San Diego: San Diego State University MA thesis.10.31979/etd.v36r-dk3uSearch in Google Scholar
Barnard, Joseph. 1934. A handbook of the Rawang dialect of the Nung language. Rangoon: Supt. of Government Printing and Stationery.Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, James. 1975. Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul. 1995. PTB/PST pronominal *-i suffix. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 18(1). 111–115.Search in Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul. 1998. The first person pronoun in Archaic Chinese, with a note on duplex characters. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 21(2). 1–2.Search in Google Scholar
Borchers, Dörte. 2008. A grammar of Sunwar. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals of language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar
Caughley, Ross. 1982. The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar
Chhangte, Lalnunthangi. 1993. Mizo syntax. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1971. An introduction to the Nocte language. Shillong: North East Frontier Agency.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2010. Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–38.10.5070/H99123042Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2014. Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.01lan.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2017. Hierarchical and accusative alignment of verbal person marking in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4(1). 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2017-0003.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2018. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony, 349–379. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.121.10delSearch in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2019. Non-singular pronouns in Tibeto-Burman (Trans-Himalayan). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42(1). 110–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.18006.del.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. Forthcoming. Argument indexation (verb agreement) in South Central (“Kuki-Chin”). Himalayan Linguistics 20(1).Search in Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Leiden: Leiden University PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846812Search in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1993. A grammar of Dumi. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110880915Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1994. The structure of Kiranti languages (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Nr. 13). Zurich: Universität Zurich.Search in Google Scholar
Gerber, Pascal. 2020. Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Mönpa phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43(1). 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.18015.ger.Search in Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2014. The personal agreement system of Zbu Rgyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1). 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12007.Search in Google Scholar
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A grammar of Eastern Geshiza. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2007. A shared suppletive pattern in the pronominal systems of Chang Naga and Southern Qiang. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 36(1). 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-90000161.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov. 2014. Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7). 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12079.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Michailovsky Boyd & Dhana Rai Khaling. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1095–1170.Search in Google Scholar
Kurabe, Keita. 2016. A grammar of Jinghpaw, from Northern Burma. Kyoto: Kyoto University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2002. Aspects of the grammar of Thulung Rai: An endangered Himalayan language. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. Grammaire du khrosyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3 Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Matisoff, James. 2003. Handbook of Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Oko, Christina Willis. 2019. A grammar of Darma. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004409491Search in Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean. 2004. A grammar of Wambule. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047414131Search in Google Scholar
Perlin, Ross. 2019. A grammar of Trung. Himalayan Linguistics 18(2). i–457. https://doi.org/10.5070/H918244579 (accessed 02 May 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Pons, Marie-Caroline. Forthcoming. On the origin of 2nd person prefix #tV- in Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 44(2).10.1075/ltba.20004.ponSearch in Google Scholar
Prins, Maria. 2016. A grammar of rGyalrong Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004325630Search in Google Scholar
Reichle, Verena. 1981. Bawm language and lore. Peter Lang: Bern.Search in Google Scholar
Saxena, Anju. 1997. Towards a reconstruction of the Proto West Himalayish agreement system. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 73–94. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603340Search in Google Scholar
Stern, Theodore. 1963. A provisional sketch of Sizang (Siyin) Chin. Asia Major (n.s.) 10. 222–278.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, Theodore. 1984. Sizang (Siyin) Chin texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8(1). 43–58.Search in Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1985. Pronouns, verb agreement systems, and the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Graham Thurgood, James Matisoff & David Bradley (eds.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art, 376–400. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486883Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston