Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 14, 2021

Procliticization as a residual of second positioning: evidence from West Iranian languages

Masoud Mohammadirad ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Pollet Samvelian ORCID logo
From the journal Folia Linguistica

Abstract

Person clitics show proclitic attachment in some West Iranian languages. Nevertheless, most of the literature has continued to focus on enclitics. This paper provides evidence that a good number of modern languages have developed proclitics, presumably from the middle Iranian period onward. Using synchronic data from modern languages gathered in the field, and contrasting it with the Middle Iranian period and current clausal second-position clitic systems, we develop some hypotheses regarding the rise of proclitics in modern languages. We argue that proclitic attachment has resulted from the reanalysis and/or the loss of clause-initial clitic hosting particles of the Middle Iranian period, and the actualization of the stray clitic as a proclitic on some host to the right. This trajectory from second position enclitics to proclitics, which is also attested in Old Romance and Uto-Aztecan, is argued to have been triggered by head attraction and rightward drift of clitics from clause-second position toward the verb in modern languages, giving rise to VP-based and Verb-based cliticization systems.


Corresponding author: Masoud Mohammadirad, University of Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3, Paris, France, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

We thank Geoffrey Haig for his comments on the draft version of the article. We also express our gratitude to the two anonymous reviewers for their comments, which led to significant improvement of the paper. We are grateful to Emmanuel Giraudet from the research group ‘Centre de recherche sur le Monde Iranien’ for the creation of maps. Any remaining shortcomings remains our own. Masoud Mohammadirad’s work was enabled by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 665850.

Appendix

In Table 7 some information is provided about each language investigated in this paper. Due to limitations of space only the number of spoken narratives have been provided in the dataset column (cf. Mohammadirad 2020: Ch. 1 for metadata). Note that as there is no reliable census on language communities it is hard to provide realistic data for the number of speakers, given also the fact that a considerable portion of many language communities grow with little knowledge of native languages. Therefore, for some languages the number of speakers can alternatively be interpreted as the population size.

Table 7:

General information on investigated languages.

Language Size of dataset Approximate n. of speakers Location Further information
Baneh Central Kurdish 4 spoken narratives 100,000 35.99534, 45.88214 cf. Sorani (<Central Kurdish) in Glottolog
Southern Central Kurdish 3 spoken narratives 800,000 35.31271, 46.99745 cf. Sine’i (<Central Kurdish) in Glottolog
Bijar Southern Kurdish 4 spoken narratives 30,000 35.87820, 47.59137 cf. Garruci (<Southern Kurdish) in Glottolog
Gorani Takht 4 spoken narratives 5,000 35.25539, 46.25510 cf. Hawraman-i Taxt (<Gurani) in Glottolog
Gorani Qal’eh 3 spoken narratives 2000 35.13358, 47.80199 Not listed in Glottolog
Laki Kakevandi 4 spoken narratives 100,000 34.26456, 47.61051 cf. Laki in Glottolog
Laki Harsini 7 spoken narratives 20,000 34.27218, 47.58576 cf. Belelli (2016); Lakic Southern Kurdish in Glottolog
Chali (Shali) 3 spoken narratives 15,000 35.89884, 49.76503 cf. Southern Tatic (<Tatic) in Glottolog
Takestani 1 spoken narrative 50,000 36.07556, 49.69086 cf. Takestani (<Ramand-Karaj < Tatic) in Glottolog
Semnani 2 spoken narratives 100,000 35.59008, 53.37433 cf. Semnani-Biyabuneki in Glottolog
Central Taleshi 1 spoken narrative 200,000 37.79848, 48.90740 cf. Central Talyshi in Glottolog
Delijani 2 spoken narratives 20,000 33.99254, 50.68019 cf. Delijani (<Soic) in Glottolog
Khansari 2 spoken narratives 15,000 33.29052, 50.31922 cf. Khunsaric in Glottolog
Meymei 3 spoken narratives 6,000 33.44972, 51.16804 cf. Mayma’i (<Soic) in Glottolog
Abuzeydabadi 2 spoken narratives 6,000 33.89916, 51.76530 cf. Abuzeydabadi (<Soic) in Glottolog
Badrudi 4 spoken narratives 14,000 33.69181, 52.00395 cf. Badrudi (<Natanzic) in Glottolog
Nikabad-Jondun 5 spoken narratives 6,000 32.30685, 52.20724 cf. Gazic in Glottolog
Naeini 2 spoken narratives 20,000 32.86043, 53.08112 cf. Nayini (<Nayinic) in Glottolog
Yazdi Zoroastrian 8 spoken narratives 10,000 31.88138, 54.37355 cf. Gabri (<Zoroastrian Yazdi) in Glottolog
Sivandi 4 spoken narratives 3,000 30.08182, 52.92264 cf. Sivandi (<Central Iran Kermanic) in Glottolog
Koroshi 7 spoken narratives 10,000 29.52698, 52.66519 cf. Nourzaei et al. (2015), Balochic in Glottolog
Luri-type languages 5 spoken narratives 2–3 million 33.50349, 49.05946 cf. Amān Allāhī Bahārvand and Thackston (1986), Luric in Glottolog
Behbahani 6 spoken narratives 60,000 30.59746, 50.23304 not listed in Glottolog
Nowdani 2 spoken narratives 3,000 29.79956, 51.68829 not listed in Glottolog
Davani 5 spoken narratives 600 29.70200, 51.67361 cf. Davani (<Fars dialects) in Glottolog
Delvari 2 spoken narratives 4,000 28.76228, 51.06716 not listed in Glottolog
Dashti 3 spoken narratives 40,000 28.34110, 51.52374 not listed in Glottolog
Lari 4 spoken narratives 50,000 27.67415, 54.32065 cf. Lari (<Larestani) in Glottolog
Bastaki 3 spoken narratives 10,000 27.19754, 54.36614 cf. Bastak (<Larestani) in Glottolog
Bandari 3 spoken narratives 200,000 27.18477, 56.25640 not listed in Glottolog
Minabi 3 spoken narratives 70,000 27.12748, 57.07667 not listed in Glottolog

References

Amān Allāhī Bahārvand, Sikandar & Wheeler McIntosh Thackston. 1986. Tales from Luristan (Matalyâ Lurissu̳): Tales, fables, and folk poetry from the Lur of Bâlâ-Garîva (Harvard Iranian Series 4). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Belelli, Sara. 2016. A study of language and foklore in the city of Harsin (Kermānshāh province, west Iran). Naples: University of Naples dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Brunner, Christopher J. 1977. A syntax of western Middle Iranian. Delmar & New York: Caravan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2005. Morphology in the wrong place: A survey of preposed enclitics. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations: Selected papers from the 11th morphology meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 17–37. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.264.02cysSearch in Google Scholar

Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 2008. On agent clitics in Balochi. In Carina Jahani, Agnes Korn & Titus Paul (eds.), The Baloch and others. Linguistic, historical and socio-political perspectives on pluralism in Balochistan, 83–101. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond. 2006. The hymns to the living soul. Middle Persian and Parthian texts in the Turfan collection. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond. 2014. Grammatik des Westmitteliranischen (Parthisch und Mittelpersisch) (Sitzungsberichte Der Phil.-Hist. Klasse 850, Veröffentlichungen Zur Iranistik 73, Grammatica Iranica, Band 1). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.10.2307/j.ctt1vw0pjfSearch in Google Scholar

Erschler, David. 2009. Possession marking in ossetic: Arguing for Caucasian influences. Linguistic Typology 13(3). 417–450. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2009.021.Search in Google Scholar

Gholami, Saloumeh. 2016. Zoroastrians of Iran: Linguistic documentation. Encyclopedia Iranica. www.iranicaonline.org/articles/zoroastrians-in-iran-06 (accessed 18 February 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Gholami, Saloumeh. 2018. Pronominal Clitics in Zoroastrian Dari (Behdînî) of Kerman. In Saloumeh Gholami (ed.), Endangered Iranian languages, 111–122. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 37). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198614Search in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey. 2013. The subject/object asymmetry in bound person indexing: Diachronic and discourse considerations. https://www.academia.edu/2759840/The_subject_object_asymmetry_in_bound_person_indexing_diachronic_and_discourse_considerations (accessed 25 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey. 2017. Deconstructing Iranian ergativity. In Jessica Coon, Diane Messam & Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 465–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.20Search in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey. 2018. The grammaticalization of object pronouns: Why differential object indexing is an attractor state. Linguistics 56(4). 781–818. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, Aaron. 1998. Clitics. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 101–122. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781405166348.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Search in Google Scholar

Heston, Wilma Louise. 1976. Selected problems in fifth to tenth century Iranian syntax. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ivanow, Wladimir. 1940. The Gabri dialect spoken by the Zoroastrians of Persia. Roma: G. Bardi.Search in Google Scholar

Jügel, Thomas. 2017. Enclitic pronouns in middle Persian and the placeholder construction. In Mahmoud Jaafari Dehaghi (ed.), Quaterly journal of language and inscription: Dedicated to Professor Mansour Shaki, 41–63. Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopeadia. https://www.academia.edu/35077578/Enclitic_Pronouns_in_Middle_Persian_and_the_Placeholder_Construction (accessed 10 January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Jügel, Thomas & Pollet Samvelian. 2016. Les pronoms enclitiques dans les langues ouest-iraniennes. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 111(1). 391–432.Search in Google Scholar

Karimi, Yadgar. 2010. Unaccusative transitives and the person-case constraint effects in Kurdish. Lingua 120(3). 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.006.Search in Google Scholar

Korn, Agnes. 2009. Western Iranian pronominal clitics. Orientalia Suecana 58. 159–171.Search in Google Scholar

Korn, Agnes. 2016. A partial tree of Central Iranian. Indogermanische Forschungen 121(1). 401–434. https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2016-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Korn, Agnes. 2019. Isoglosses and subdivisions of Iranian. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(2). 239–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17010.kor.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Texas: University of Texas.10.7560/750357-005Search in Google Scholar

Lecoq, Pierre. 2002. Recherches sur les dialectes Kermaniens (Iran central): Grammaire, textes, traductions et glossaires (Acta Iranica 39). Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

MacKenzie, David N. 1971. A concise Pahlavi dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Colin. 1977. The New Persian preverb bi-. Journal of the American Oriental Society 97(1). 8–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/600269.Search in Google Scholar

Mahamedi, Hamid. 1982. The story of Rostam and Esfandiyār in an Iranian dialect. Journal of the American Oriental Society 102(3). 451–459. https://doi.org/10.2307/602297.Search in Google Scholar

Mann, Oskar. 1909. Die Tājīk-Mundarten der Provinz Fārs (Kurdisch-Persische Forschungen). Berlin: Georg Reimer.10.1515/9783111696911Search in Google Scholar

Menn, Lise & Brian MacWhinney. 1984. The repeated morph constraint: Toward an explanation. Language 60(3). 519–541. https://doi.org/10.2307/413990.Search in Google Scholar

Mohammadirad, Masoud. 2020. Pronominal clitics in Western Iranian languages: Description, mapping, and typological implications. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Nevis, Joel A. 2000. Clitics. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, vol. 1, 388–404. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110111286.1.6.388Search in Google Scholar

Nourzaei, Maryam, Carina Jahani, Erik John Anonby & Abbas Ali Ahangar. 2015. Koroshi: A corpus-based grammatical description (Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 13). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Search in Google Scholar

Öpengin, Ergin. 2013. Clitic/affix interactions. A corpus-based study of person marking in the Mukri variety of Central Kurdish. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Öpengin, Ergin & Masoud Mohammadirad. Forthcoming. Formal and functional variation in pronominal clitics across Kurdish: Documentation and explanations. In Yaron Matras, Ergin Öpengin & Geoffrey Haig (eds.), Structural and typological variation in the dialects of Kurdish. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Ludwig. 1998. The position of Zazaki among West Iranian languages. In Nicholas Sims-Williams (ed.), Proceedings of the third European conference of Iranian studies. Part 1: Old and Middle Iranian studies, 163–177. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Samvelian, Pollet. 2007a. What Sorani Kurdish absolute prepositions tell us about cliticization. In Frederic Hoyt, Nikki Seifert, Alexandra Teodorescu & Jessica White (eds.), Texas Linguistic Society IX: The morphosyntax of underrepresented languages, 263–283. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Samvelian, Pollet. 2007b. A lexical account of Sorani Kurdish prepositions. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on head-driven phrase structure grammar, 235–249. Stanford: CSLI Publications.10.21248/hpsg.2007.14Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Rüdiger (ed.). 1989. Compendium linguarum Iranicarum. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Steele, Susan. 1977. Clisis and diachrony. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 539–579. Texas: University of Texas Press.10.7560/750357-016Search in Google Scholar

Wanner, Dieter. 1987. The development of Romance clitic pronouns: From Latin to Old Romance (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 3). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110893069Search in Google Scholar

Windfuhr, Gernot. 2009. Dialectology and topics. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 5–42. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203641736-9Search in Google Scholar

Windfuhr, Gernot. 1975. Isoglosses. A sketch on Persians and Parthians, Kurds and Medes. In Monumentum H. S. Nyberg, vol. 2, 457–472. Téhéran & Liège: Bibliothèque Pahlavi.Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 1998. Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In Patrick Farrell & Steven G. Lapointe (eds.), Morphology and its relation to syntax and phonology, 216–247. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-14
Accepted: 2021-04-12
Published Online: 2021-10-14
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.1.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2021-2024/html
Scroll Up Arrow